PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

Some of the other options are not appropriate because:

A. Negotiate a reduced review attendance with the stakeholder and update the stakeholder engagement plan to reflect this reduced. This option may compromise the quality and effectiveness of the reviews, as the stakeholder may miss important information, feedback, or decisions. It may also create a perception of low priority or commitment from the stakeholder, which can affect the trust and relationship with the project team3. The stakeholder engagement plan should reflect the optimal level of engagement for each stakeholder, not the minimum4.

C. Record the issue in the issue log and escalate the conflict to the project sponsor for assistance. This option may be too drastic and premature, as the issue may not be a serious conflict that requires escalation. Escalation should be used as a last resort, when the project manager cannot resolve the issue by themselves or with the stakeholder5. Escalation may also damage the rapport and communication with the stakeholder, as it may imply that the project manager is unable to handle the situation or respect the stakeholder’s perspective.

D. Explain to the stakeholder that the stakeholder engagement plan requires their attendance at all reviews. This option may sound too rigid and authoritative, as it does not acknowledge the stakeholder’s concern or provide any justification for the frequency of the reviews. It may also create a sense of resentment or resistance from the stakeholder, who may feel that they are being forced to comply with a plan that they do not agree with or understand. The stakeholder engagement plan should be a flexible and collaborative tool, not a rigid and imposed one4.

I hope this information helps you with your query. However, I suggest that you consult the official PMP and PBA reference materials and guides for more accurate and reliable information. Thank you for using Bing. 😊

Transparent and collaborative communication is essential during organizational change. The most inclusive and effective approach is to bring together the PMO and project team in a joint meeting to clarify questions, ensure alignment, and minimize uncertainty.

The PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition emphasizes cross-functional collaboration and stakeholder engagement as essential project leadership responsibilities during restructuring and transitions.

Option A may be seen as confrontational or top-down.

Option B is reactive and directive without facilitation.

Option D makes assumptions that may not be accurate.

According to the PMBOK guide, a hybrid approach is a combination of predictive and adaptive (agile) methodologies that suits the project context and stakeholder needs1. A retrospective is a meeting held at the end of each iteration in agile projects, where the team reflects on what went well and what can be improved2. The PMI-PBA guide also states that retrospectives are a valuable tool for business analysts to identify and address issues, risks, and opportunities for improvement3. Therefore, the best way for the project manager to deal with the decline in productivity is to discuss the issue in the next retrospective with the team and collaboratively find solutions to enhance their performance. References:

1: PMBOK guide, page 19

2: PMBOK guide, page 207

3: PMI-PBA guide, page 129

QUE : A self-organizing team is a team that has the autonomy and authority to manage its own work and make its own decisions. A self-organizing team is also expected to adapt to changing situations and learn new skills as needed. Therefore, the best management decision for this situation is to provide opportunity for team members to learn and adjust to the new technology, rather than moving them, adding new members, or re-assigning the project. This will help the team overcome the learning curve and improve their velocity in the future. It will also foster trust, collaboration, and innovation within the team. Providing opportunity for team members to learn and adjust to the technology is consistent with the agile principles and values, which emphasize continuous improvement, customer satisfaction, and team empowerment. It is also covered in the PMBOK Guide under the Develop Team process, and in the PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline under Domain III: Analysis. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 247

PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, 2018, page 11

Agile Manifesto

STION NO: 184 DRAG DROP

Drag the interpersonal skill on the left to the correct scenario on the right.

Answer:

A project manager who is managing two integrated projects in a program should use effective communication and conflict management skills to resolve issues that arise from misalignment or integration points. The project manager should first meet with both integration leads to understand the root cause of the problem and facilitate a collaborative solution that satisfies both parties and aligns with the program objectives. Assigning the resolution of the issue to either one of the integration leads, or escalating the issue to the program architect, are not the best options as they may create more conflict or undermine the authority of the project manager. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 65

Standard for Program Management, 4th edition, page 67

PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, page 10

[PMI-PBA Handbook], page 11

The servant leader project manager should explore a training program that is within the project budget for the team members. This is the best option because it shows the project manager’s commitment to developing the team’s skills and capabilities, as well as addressing the project’s needs. A training program can help the team members acquire the technical skills required for the upcoming tasks, as well as increase their motivation and confidence. This option also aligns with the servant leadership principle of "commitment to the growth of people"1.

The other options are not as effective as option D. Option A is not supportive and may demoralize the team members. Option B is not collaborative and may disrupt the team dynamics. Option C is not proactive and may damage the project manager’s credibility. References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 63

According to the PMBOK Guide1, a hybrid approach is a combination of predictive and adaptive (agile) methodologies that suits the needs and context of a project. A hybrid approach can provide flexibility, customer satisfaction, and risk management benefits. However, it also requires a high level of collaboration, communication, and alignment among the project stakeholders, especially the sponsor and the team. Therefore, the project manager should train the marketing team on the hybrid approach and keep their director informed of the progress, benefits, and challenges of using it. This way, the project manager can ensure that the team is competent and confident in applying the hybrid approach, and that the director is aware and supportive of the new direction. The project manager can also use this opportunity to address any concerns or resistance from the director and demonstrate the value of the hybrid approach for the project and the organization.

The other options are not as effective as option C. Option A is not realistic, as the marketing director may not have the time or interest to receive formal training on the hybrid approach. Option B is not respectful, as the marketing team members are not in a position to coach their director. Option D is not appropriate, as the project manager is not the director’s mentor and cannot assume that role without the director’s consent and agreement. References: 1 PMBOK Guide, Seventh Edition, Chapter 2: Value Delivery System, Section 2.3: Tailoring the Delivery Approach, Page 38.