PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

 When a key team member is unexpectedly absent, it’s important for the project manager to collaborate with the rest of the team to assess the impact and reprioritize tasks. This is in line with agile principles, which emphasize team collaboration and self-organization1. The team should collectively decide how to redistribute the workload, possibly by sharing responsibilities or adjusting the iteration’s scope. This approach maintains the team’s agility and ensures that everyone is on board with the revised plan, fostering a sense of ownership and commitment to the project’s success.

 When missing requirements specifications are identified during the design phase, the project manager should meet with the development team to review and assess the requirements. This collaborative approach ensures that all team members are aware of the discrepancies and can contribute to finding a solution. It is also aligned with the PMBOK® Guide’s emphasis on engaging stakeholders and maintaining open communication throughout the project lifecycle. By assessing the requirements with the team, the project manager can ensure that the project remains aligned with its objectives while addressing the gaps in the specifications.

In agile project management, retrospectives are a fundamental part of the continuous improvement process. They provide an opportunity for the team to reflect on the past iteration, discuss what went well and what didn’t, and create a plan for improvements moving forward. Addressing the root cause of the quality issues is essential to prevent them from recurring. By involving the team in the problem-solving process, not only can more effective solutions be found, but it also ensures team buy-in and accountability for the quality of the deliverables. This approach aligns with the principles of the PMBOK® Guide and the agile methodology, which emphasize the importance of team collaboration, regular reflection, and adaptation to change.

The answer is verified using the PMBOK® Guide principles that advocate for continuous improvement and the agile practice of conducting retrospectives for process enhancement12. Additionally, the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials supports the approach of involving the team in identifying and solving problems to improve project outcomes3.

According to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) Guide, when a new stakeholder joins the project, especially one who can significantly influence the project’s direction, the project manager should first ensure that this stakeholder has a clear understanding of the project. This includes the project’s objectives, scope, deliverables, milestones, and risks. By presenting the project to the new stakeholder, the project manager can align the stakeholder’s expectations and decisions with the project’s goals and constraints. This is crucial to maintain the project’s progress and manage the change effectively. References: Project Management Professional (PMP) Reference Materials, PMBOK Guide, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Management.

When a project team is demotivated due to a framework that is not compatible with agile delivery, the project lead should ask the PMO to review the framework. This is because the PMO is responsible for defining and maintaining project management standards and practices within an organization. A review can help identify the specific areas where the current framework is lacking and how it can be adapted to support agile methodologies. This aligns with the PMBOK guide’s principles of tailoring project management practices to meet the unique needs of each project1.

 The project manager should validate if the training request is within the scope and budget of the project before approving or rejecting it. The training request may be a valid requirement that was not identified during the planning process, or it may be a nice-to-have that is not necessary for the project success. The project manager should evaluate the benefits and costs of the training request and compare them with the project baseline. If the training request is within the scope and budget, the project manager can approve it. If the training request is outside the scope and budget, the project manager should send it to the change control board (CCB) for approval. The CCB is responsible for reviewing and approving change requests that affect the project baseline. Rejecting the request without validation may result in missing a critical requirement or losing a valuable team member. Approving the request without validation may result in scope creep or budget overrun. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.5.6, “Change Requests”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.6.3.1, “Requirements Documentation Updates”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 7, Section 7.4.3.1, “Cost Forecasts”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.3.3.1, “Resource Requirements Updates”

 A change log is a document that contains the list of changes that are made during the project. It tracks the progress of each change based on its review, approval, implementation, and closure. A change log is a useful tool for communicating the status of change requests to the stakeholders, as it shows the impact and outcome of each change. A risk log, a backlog, and an issue log are different documents that serve different purposes. A risk log records the identified risks, their probability, impact, and response strategies. A backlog is a list of features or tasks that need to be completed in an agile project. An issue log records the issues that arise during the project, their causes, effects, and resolution. References:

Change Log - Project Management Knowledge

Change Log Template - Project Management Docs

Risks, issues, and changes–help, I’m drowning in logs!

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use a participatory approach to develop the project schedule, involving the team members who will perform the work1. This will increase the accuracy and reliability of the schedule estimates, as well as the commitment and ownership of the team2. Therefore, the best option is to organize a planning session with the development team and use their estimations to complete the schedule. Option B is incorrect because changing the delivery date for the project schedule based on the availability of a new contractor may not be feasible or acceptable to the stakeholders. Option C is incorrect because asking the sponsor to provide the desired completion date for project activities may not reflect the realistic effort and duration required to complete the work. Option D is incorrect because using expert judgment to estimate all of the tasks may not account for the variability and uncertainty of the work, and may not involve the input and feedback of the team members. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.1.2.5, p. 191 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 6.5.2.4, p. 218