PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

In a project where different teams are using different approaches (predictive and agile), it’s important to respect the methodologies that each team is comfortable with. Forcing a single approach could disrupt the workflow and productivity of the teams. Instead, allowing the teams to continue with their chosen approaches while gradually adapting to a hybrid model can provide a balance. This approach respects the existing workflows while moving towards a more unified project management approach. The hybrid model combines the strengths of both predictive and agile approaches, providing flexibility and adaptability while maintaining a level of predictability. References: PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition and Agile Practice Guide (Page 27, 3.1.3 Tailoring Considerations for Knowledge Areas)

The Laissez-faire management style is characterized by a hands-off approach where leaders provide teams with resources and advice, if needed, but otherwise don’t interfere. This style is most effective with experienced, highly competent, and self-directed teams who are capable of performing their tasks without much supervision. In the context of the question, the project manager trusts the team and their work, indicating that they are likely using a Laissez-faire approach. References: 

https://www.g2.com/articles/project-management-approach

During the initiation phase of a project, the project manager and the team define the project idea, including project goals, scope, and resources1. If a potential risk, such as low construction productivity, is identified during a lessons learned sharing session, it should be added to the risk register1. The risk register is a document where all details of the identified risks are recorded. The project manager should then develop a mitigation strategy for site execution. This strategy could include various actions to address the risk, such as improving processes, providing additional training, or hiring additional resources. The goal is to reduce the impact of the risk on the project’s objectives. References: Asana Resources | Project management, 4 Phases of the Project Management Lifecycle Explained | Coursera

 The project manager should perform iterative planning with the team to use the prototype, as this would allow them to adapt to the changing situation and deliver value incrementally. Iterative planning is a technique that involves breaking down the project scope into smaller iterations, each with its own plan, deliverables, and feedback loops. This technique enables the project team to respond to uncertainties, risks, and changes more effectively, and to incorporate lessons learned and stakeholder feedback into the next iteration. In this case, the project manager can use iterative planning to align the team with the new solution, define the requirements and acceptance criteria for the prototype, and monitor and control the integration and testing of the prototype. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 67, section 3.2.2

PMI Agile Practice Guide, page 33, section 3.2.1

PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 14, section 3.3.1.1

According to the Agile Practice Guide, the definition of done (DoD) is a clear and concise list of requirements that a deliverable must adhere to for the team to consider it complete. The DoD helps to ensure that the quality standards and customer expectations are met, and that there is a consistent understanding of what done means among the team and the customer. Therefore, the project manager should have included all relevant criteria in the agreed upon DoD, and crafted a shared product vision that aligns with the customer’s needs and goals. This would have helped to prevent the customer from rejecting the deliverables at the end of the iteration. Involved the customer more in the planning process for the project, and ensured agreement on the proceedings may be a good practice, but it is not the best answer. The customer may still reject the deliverables if the planning process does not result in a clear and agreed upon DoD and product vision. Provided the customer with the backlog and the specified user stories at the beginning of the iteration may be helpful, but it is not sufficient to prevent the customer from rejecting the deliverables. The backlog and the user stories may change during the iteration, and they may not reflect the quality criteria and the customer expectations. Developed the DoD in close cooperation with all stakeholders to ensure their expectations were included may be a good practice, but it is not the best answer. The DoD should be developed with the customer, not with all stakeholders. Some stakeholders may have different or conflicting expectations than the customer, and they may not be the ones who accept or reject the deliverables. References: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2 (Definition of Done) and Section 3.2.3 (Product Vision)

 According to the Project Management Professional (PMP)® Examination Content Outline1, one of the tasks under the domain of executing is to “assess and prioritize impact of changes to project scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, and risks”. This implies that before implementing any change request, the project manager should first evaluate how the change will affect the project objectives and deliverables, and whether the change is aligned with the business case and the stakeholder expectations. The business case is the document that justifies the initiation of a project by providing the expected benefits, costs, risks, and strategic alignment of the project2. Therefore, the project manager should identify how the proposed changes will benefit the project in relation to the business case, and communicate the results of the assessment to the senior management and other relevant stakeholders. This can help to ensure that the changes are necessary, feasible, and beneficial, and that they do not compromise the project scope, quality, or value. References:

1: Project Management Professional (PMP)® Examination Content Outline, page 10

2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, page 29

According to the PMBOK Guide, stakeholder engagement is the process of communicating and working with stakeholders to meet their needs and expectations, address issues, and foster appropriate stakeholder involvement. The project manager should engage with the town’s authorities to understand the root cause of their resistance, address their concerns, and negotiate a mutually acceptable solution that aligns with the project objectives and scope. This is also consistent with the PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, which states that project managers should respect the legitimate interests of others and seek to resolve conflicts constructively. Changing the project scope, moving to the next town, or sending the minutes of stakeholder engagements are not effective ways of dealing with stakeholder resistance, as they may create more problems, risks, or dissatisfaction for the project and its stakeholders. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 156-157, 161-162, 166-167

PMI Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct, pages 4-5

PMI-PBA Guide, 2nd edition, pages 75-76, 80-81, 85-86

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for performing integrated change control, which involves reviewing and approving change requests that may affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or other aspects. Therefore, the project manager should review the benefits of the proposed changes in relation to the business case, which is the document that justifies the project initiation and continuation based on the expected value and alignment with the organizational strategy. The project manager should evaluate if the proposed changes are necessary, feasible, and beneficial for the project and the organization, and if they outweigh the potential costs and risks. Assessing the time overrun, and starting implementation to avoid additional delays may not be the best option, as it may result in scope creep, quality issues, or stakeholder dissatisfaction. The project manager should not implement the changes without reviewing and approving them first, and without communicating them to the relevant parties. Requesting a provisional budget increase to avoid any budget overruns may not be possible or timely. The project manager should not request more funds without analyzing the impact of the changes on the project budget, and without obtaining the approval or guidance from the management or the sponsor. Motivating the team to avoid the frustration of working on a prolonged project may be a good practice, but it is not the first thing the project manager should do. The project manager should first address the change requests and their implications for the project, and then manage the team’s expectations and morale accordingly. References: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.6 (Perform Integrated Change Control) and Chapter 5, Section 5.1.3.1 (Business Case)