PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the product owner is the person responsible for defining and prioritizing the product backlog, and ensuring that the product delivers value to the customer and stakeholders1. The product owner also collaborates with the project team and the project manager to review the work in progress and provide feedback2. Therefore, if a key agile project team member takes a leave of absence in the middle of an iteration and will not return to work for a while, the project manager should review the work in progress with the product owner to determine the next step regarding the feature on which the team member was working. The product owner may decide to defer, modify, or cancel the feature depending on the value and urgency of the feature. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to do next. Assigning the feature to another team member may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the team’s self-organization and velocity3. Reviewing team capacity and reassigning the functionality to additional iterations may not be aligned with the product owner’s vision and expectations4. Determining if the team member can work from home may not be possible or appropriate, as it may depend on the team member’s personal situation and the nature of the work. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 49

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 50

3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 52

4: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 53

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 54

: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 57

Agile and incremental delivery focuses on delivering value early and frequently. Since the prototype is being built incrementally, the project is likely following an adaptive or hybrid lifecycle. In such cases, delivering business value as soon as possible is the key objective. This enables faster feedback, early realization of benefits, and improved customer satisfaction.

According to the PMBOK® Guide – Seventh Edition (Value Delivery System), one of the key goals of a project is to maximize value delivery. The Agile Practice Guide emphasizes iterative delivery and prioritizing features with the highest business value early in development.

Option A (PDCA) is a general continuous improvement method, not specific to value delivery prioritization.

Option C (Kanban) is a scheduling method that may help visualize flow but is not the primary priority here.

Option D (informing the sponsor of the schedule) is good practice but not the highest priority in this context.

In a project, when a task on the critical path is at risk of delaying the schedule, it’s crucial for the project manager to identify any impediments that might be causing the delay. In Agile methodologies, such as Scrum, this is often done during daily standup meetings. If a team member has been providing the same update for several days, it may indicate that they are facing a blocker. The project manager should ask the team member if there is an impediment and help to remove the blockers. This approach promotes problem-solving and helps keep the project on track. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Section 8.3 - Control Schedule

 The project manager should evaluate the situation and identify ways to compress the schedule without impacting baselines, as this is a strategy for handling delays in project programming activities. According to the PMI website, project delays can occur due to various reasons, such as complexity, resource constraints, poor communication, or risk management issues. When a project is behind schedule or at risk of a critical delay, the project manager should analyze the root causes and the impact of the delay, and determine the best course of action to bring the project back on track. One of the possible actions is to compress the schedule, which is a technique to shorten the project duration without changing the project scope. There are two methods of schedule compression: crashing and fast-tracking. Crashing involves adding or adjusting resources, such as people, equipment, or materials, to critical path activities, to reduce their duration. Fast-tracking involves performing critical path activities in parallel or partially in parallel, to reduce their overall duration. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, and the project manager should weigh them carefully before applying them. The project manager should also monitor and control the schedule performance, and communicate any changes or updates to the stakeholders1.

The other options, asking the team to work overtime, checking the scope, or submitting a change request, are not the best ways to handle delays in project programming activities. Asking the team to work overtime may not be feasible or effective, as it may increase costs, risks, or rework, and may also demotivate or burn out the team members. Checking the scope may help the project manager to verify if there is scope creep, which is the uncontrolled expansion of the project scope, but it may not address the actual causes or consequences of the delay. Submitting a change request may help the project manager to follow the change management process and seek approval from the project sponsor or the change control board, but it may not be necessary or desirable, as it may imply that the project manager is unable to manage the schedule within the agreed baselines.

 1 A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 6.6 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, Chapter 4.3.4 3 How to Manage Project Delays: 6 Effective Tips - ProProfs Project Blog 4 How Can Project Managers Handle Project Delays? - Online Tutorials Library 5 Dealing with delays - Project Management Institute

In agile project management, when a new technology is introduced and results in a decrease in team velocity, it is essential to use retrospectives to analyze the situation. Retrospectives allow the team to reflect on what has happened, identify any skill gaps, and understand the impact of the new technology on the project’s schedule. This understanding can then be used to make necessary adjustments to the team composition or process to improve velocity1.

Increasing Your Scrum Team’s Velocity — ClearlyAgile1.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a project budget is the authorized amount of funds allocated to the project. The project budget is derived from the cost baseline, which is the aggregation of the estimated costs of individual activities or work packages. The project budget should reflect the project scope, schedule, resources, risks, and quality requirements. A project manager should review the base budget model with the team leaders in each country to establish an independent budget for each phase when delivering a highly customizable software solution in multiple countries with significantly different cultures. This will help to account for the variations in the project requirements, constraints, assumptions, and risks in each country and phase, and to ensure the accuracy and adequacy of the project budget. Reviewing the base budget model with the team leaders in each country to establish an independent budget for each phase is the best action that the project manager should do next in this situation. Overestimating costs and underestimating revenues to include the impacts of different cultural elements (B) may not be realistic or reliable, as it may create a false sense of security, waste resources, or reduce profitability. Applying the company’s operational budgeting model © may not be suitable or applicable, as it may not capture the specific characteristics and challenges of the project. Asking the project management office (PMO) to review the draft budget (D) may be a possible action, but not the next one, as it may be premature or ineffective without reviewing the base budget model with the team leaders in each country first. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 235-236, 260-261.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should follow the change management process to handle any change request, regardless of the source or nature of the change. The change management process involves identifying, analyzing, documenting, presenting, deciding, communicating, and implementing the change request. The first step in this process is to validate the proposed change’s impact on the project, which means assessing how the change would affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and other aspects. This would help the project manager to determine the feasibility, desirability, and priority of the change request, and to prepare a recommendation for the change control board (CCB). The project manager should not check the budget, accept, or refuse the change request without validating its impact first, as these actions would bypass the change management process and could lead to negative consequences for the project. References:

PMBOK Guide’s Change Management Process For PMP Exam

Change Management Process for Project

Managing Change in Organizations: A Practice Guide

Organizational process assets (OPAs) are the collective knowledge and documented processes that an organization accumulates and utilizes to enhance its efficiency, performance, and decision-making capabilities. OPAs include policies and procedures, templates, historical data, lessons learned, and best practices. OPAs are important inputs for many project management processes and can help project managers and teams plan, execute, monitor, and control their projects. Therefore, it is essential for new team members to learn about the OPAs that are relevant to their project and role. The project manager should clarify the relevance of reviewing the documentation on the intranet and explain how OPAs can help the team member perform their tasks and contribute to the project success. Creating a training schedule, escalating the inquiry, or asking a senior team member to help are not the best options, as they do not address the root cause of the inquiry, which is the lack of understanding of the value of OPAs. References:

5, pages 38-39

6, pages 3-4

1, pages 2-3

2, pages 2-3