PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

The project manager should first consider organizing paired work sessions for the junior and senior economists. This is a proactive and positive way to address the issue of intimidation and improve the performance and confidence of the junior economist. Paired work sessions can also foster collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mentoring among the project team members. This option aligns with the PMI-PBA practice guide, which states that “pairing a less experienced analyst with a more experienced one can be an effective way to transfer skills and knowledge” (p. 44). The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the root cause of the problem and may have negative consequences for the project. Evaluating the performance of the junior economist in the upcoming months (option A) is a reactive and delayed approach that does not provide any immediate support or guidance to the junior economist. Reassigning some of the junior economist’s tasks to other economists (option B) may reduce the workload of the junior economist, but it does not help him or her overcome the intimidation or develop the skills and knowledge needed for the project. Requesting to replace the junior economist with a more experienced economist (option C) may seem like a quick and easy solution, but it may also demoralize the junior economist, disrupt the project team dynamics, and incur additional costs and risks for the project. References:

PMI-PBA Practice Guide, p. 44 1

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 336 2

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use interpersonal and team skills to manage the team and resolve conflicts. One of these skills is conflict management, which involves identifying and addressing the root causes of disagreements among team members. In this case, the project manager should try to understand why the team member is absent from the meetings and what are the possible impacts on the project and the team. The project manager should also communicate the benefits of attending the meetings and encourage the team member to participate more actively. This way, the project manager can foster a collaborative and respectful team environment and avoid potential issues such as poor communication, low morale, or missed deadlines. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 282-283, 287-288.

 The project manager should communicate individually with the affected team members to negotiate the decision and confirm their willingness to relocate, as this is the most respectful and ethical way to handle the situation. Relocating team members abroad for six months is a major change that will affect their personal and professional lives, and the project manager should consider their needs, preferences, and concerns before making any final decisions. The project manager should also explain the rationale and benefits of the relocation, and offer any support or incentives that may facilitate the transition. Communicating to the whole team, the HR department, or the team members’ manager may not be appropriate or sufficient, as the project manager should first consult with the team members directly and obtain their consent. These other communication options may also create unnecessary confusion, resentment, or resistance among the team members or other stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, pages 111, 112, 113, 114.

The question is about a project that faces a potential threat from a competitor’s product launch using the same innovation. The project manager needs to assess the impact of this threat on the project’s objectives and take appropriate actions to mitigate it. The best option for the project manager to do next is:

Document the issue in the issue log and escalate to the project sponsor: This option is proactive and follows the best practice of issue management. The project manager should document the issue, its impact, and possible solutions in the issue log, which is a tool for tracking and resolving issues that affect the project. The project manager should also escalate the issue to the project sponsor, who is the person or group that provides the resources and support for the project. The project sponsor can help the project manager to evaluate the options and make decisions that align with the project’s goals and business strategy12

The other options are not as effective or appropriate as the first option. They are:

Inform the project sponsor and suggest canceling the project: This option is premature and pessimistic. The project manager should not suggest canceling the project without analyzing the situation and exploring alternatives. Canceling the project might result in wasted resources, lost opportunities, and damaged reputation. The project manager should work with the project sponsor to find ways to overcome the threat and deliver value to the customer3

Review the project goals and eat criteria m the project charter: This option is passive and incomplete. The project manager should review the project goals and acceptance criteria in the project charter, which is a document that authorizes the project and defines its scope, objectives, and stakeholders. However, this is not enough to address the issue. The project manager should also document the issue, communicate with the project sponsor, and take actions to resolve the issue4

Ask the leader of research and development to decide on next steps: This option is irresponsible and risky. The project manager should not delegate the decision-making to the leader of research and development, who might not have the authority, responsibility, or knowledge to handle the issue. The project manager should consult with the leader of research and development, who is a subject matter expert, but the project manager should also involve the project sponsor, who is the project owner, and other relevant stakeholders, who might be affected by the issue. The project manager should lead the issue resolution process and ensure that the decisions are aligned with the project’s goals and business strategy.

In situations where a stakeholder objects to a project, it is crucial for the project manager to assess the impact of the stakeholder’s concerns and engage with them properly. This involves understanding the stakeholder’s perspective, the reasons behind their objections, and the potential influence they have on the project. By doing so, the project manager can address the concerns in a manner that respects the stakeholder’s legacy ties while also guiding the project towards its objectives. Effective stakeholder engagement is a key aspect of project management and business analysis, as it helps in managing expectations, resolving conflicts, and ensuring that all parties are aligned with the project’s goals.

 The project manager should motivate the team and deploy the necessary resources to support the outcome of the new agreement. This is because the team may feel demotivated or frustrated by the changes in the project scope and schedule, which can affect their performance and morale. The project manager should acknowledge the team’s concerns, communicate the benefits of the new agreement, and provide recognition and rewards for their efforts. The project manager should also ensure that the team has the adequate resources, such as staff, equipment, materials, and budget, to complete the project successfully. The project manager should not find a way to maintain the project schedule, as this may compromise the quality or scope of the project. The project manager should not impose authority on the project, as this may create resentment or resistance among the team members. The project manager should not request additional resources from the sponsor and motivate the team, as this may not be feasible or necessary, depending on the nature and extent of the changes. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 9.4.2.3, “Team Recognition and Rewards”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 9.4.3.1, “Change Requests”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, Section 4.2.3.1, “Project Management Plan Updates”

A team charter is a document that defines the purpose, objectives, roles, and norms of a project team. It helps to align the team members’ expectations, clarify their responsibilities, and foster collaboration and trust. A team charter is an output of the Develop Team process, which involves improving the competencies and interactions of team members to enhance project performance1. A project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its high-level scope, objectives, and constraints. It is not focused on the team expectations or productivity. A stakeholder register is a document that identifies the project stakeholders and their interests, influence, and involvement in the project. It is not used to manage the team expectations or productivity. A project organization chart is a graphical representation of the project team members and their reporting relationships. It does not define the team expectations or productivity. References: 1 PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, page 349.

According to the PBA Guide, retrospectives are a technique to review the project performance and identify lessons learned, best practices, and improvement opportunities1. Retrospectives are especially useful in agile projects, where they are conducted at the end of each iteration or sprint2. By implementing retrospectives with the vendor, the project manager can ensure that the project team and the vendor share the same understanding of the project goals, requirements, and deliverables. The project manager can also facilitate knowledge transfer and collaboration between the team and the vendor, and address any issues or risks that may affect the project continuity. References: 1: PBA Guide, page 154 2: PMBOK Guide, page 188