PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

According to the PMBOK Guide, an issue log is a project document that records and tracks any issues that arise during the project and how they are resolved. It is part of the project communications management knowledge area and the monitor communications process. A project manager should update the issue log whenever a new issue is identified, analyzed, or resolved. Updating the issue log and defining the mitigation strategy is the immediate action that the project manager should take to improve the situation of a new team member impacting the project performance. This will help to document the issue, communicate it to the relevant stakeholders, and plan how to address it effectively. Communicating the issue to the human resources department (A) may be a subsequent action, but not the immediate one. Providing additional training to the new hire (B) may be a possible mitigation strategy, but not an action to take before updating the issue log. Increasing team cohesiveness by sharing information and experiences openly © may be a good practice for team development, but not a direct response to the issue at hand. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 377-378, 529-530.

According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project scope and ensuring that the project delivers the agreed-upon features and functionality (Section 5.1). If a stakeholder tells the project manager that the main requested feature in the contract is not applicable, this means that there is a significant change in the project scope, which may affect the project cost, schedule, quality, and customer satisfaction. The project manager should not ignore this information, nor should they ask the sponsor to close the project or pay the penalty, as this may damage the relationship with the customer and the reputation of the organization. Instead, the project manager should check with the team to learn what can be done, and consult an expert if needed, to find out the impact of the scope change and the possible alternatives. The project manager should also communicate with the stakeholder and the sponsor to understand the reason for the scope change, and to negotiate a mutually acceptable solution. This is also consistent with the Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, which states that one of the tasks of a business analyst is to “assess the impact of a proposed change or solution on the business need, requirements, and stakeholder expectations” (Task 3.4). References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 5.1

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Task 3.4

The best answer is D because it involves engaging the stakeholders in the decision-making process and respecting their preferences and expectations. The project manager should not impose a new approach on the stakeholders without their consent or input, as this could lead to resistance, confusion, or dissatisfaction. The project manager should also not delegate the decision to the team only, as this could exclude the stakeholders’ perspectives and needs. The project manager should explain the benefits and challenges of both the predictive and agile approaches, and facilitate a collaborative discussion with the stakeholders to reach a mutual agreement on the best approach for the new project. This would demonstrate the project manager’s leadership, communication, and stakeholder management skills, as well as the ability to adapt to changing organizational and environmental factors. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 27, section 2.2.1, “Tailoring”

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 29, section 2.2.2, “Stakeholder Engagement”

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 31, section 2.2.3, “Leadership”

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 33, section 2.2.4, “Teamwork”

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 35, section 2.2.5, “Communication”

Agile Practice Guide, page 8, section 1.2, “What is Agile?”

Agile Practice Guide, page 9, section 1.3, “Why Use Agile Approaches?”

Agile Practice Guide, page 10, section 1.4, “When to Use Agile Approaches?”

Agile Practice Guide, page 11, section 1.5, “Tailoring to the Project Environment”

Agile Practice Guide, page 12, section 1.6, “Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment”

Agile Practice Guide, page 13, section 1.7, “Implementing Agile: Delivering in an Agile Environment”

Agile Practice Guide, page 14, section 1.8, “Organizational Considerations for Project Agility”

 The project manager is responsible for ensuring that the project complies with all the applicable laws, regulations, standards, and policies of the project location. This includes health and safety requirements, environmental protection, labor laws, permits, licenses, and any other legal obligations. Failing to comply with these requirements could result in legal penalties, fines, sanctions, reputational damage, or project termination. Therefore, the project manager should address this issue as soon as possible and update the project plan accordingly. Injury or loss incidents could delay project deliverables, but this is not the primary reason why the situation is problematic. It is imperative that established performance metrics are met, but this is not directly related to the health and safety requirements. The project manager must follow their employer’s organizational process assets (OPAs), but this does not necessarily mean that they are aligned with the project location’s regulatory requirements. References: = PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 33-34, 89-90, 123-124, 375-376; PMP Exam Content Outline, 2020, pages 8-9.

After a workshop, it is essential to maintain the momentum and ensure that the action items identified are addressed promptly. The project manager should work with the team to prioritize these actions based on their importance and urgency, assign clear ownership to team members, and set deadlines for completion. This approach ensures that the team remains focused and that progress is monitored, which is critical for the successful delivery of project outcomes.

 Cross-training is a technique that allows team members to share and learn skills from each other. It can enhance team performance, increase flexibility, and reduce risks related to staff turnover or unavailability. It can also improve team cohesion and collaboration. In this scenario, the project manager should allow the engineer and designer to cross-train with each other, as this would benefit both the project and the individuals. The engineer would learn a new skill that is required for the tasks, and the designer would reinforce their existing skill by teaching it. This would also save time and money compared to external training options. Escalating the situation to the engineer’s manager, requesting external training for the engineer, or requesting external training for both the engineer and the designer are not the best choices, as they would not leverage the existing resources and expertise within the team. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 339; Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, page 16.

According to the PMBOK Guide, a strengths-based team is a team that knows and understands the strengths of each individual and they work alongside each other with a deep knowledge of how each person plays their role in the team1. A strengths-based team can enhance team performance, collaboration, innovation, and engagement2. Positive psychology is a branch of psychology that focuses on the positive aspects of human experience, such as happiness, well-being, resilience, and flourishing3. Positive psychology can help team members discover and leverage their strengths, appreciate and support each other, and cultivate a positive mindset and attitude4. Therefore, the project manager should explain the benefits of the strengths-based approach and the effects of positive psychology to the team members who are not actively participating. This can help them understand the purpose and value of the workshops, motivate them to engage and contribute, and foster a positive team culture5.

The other options are not the best ways to deal with the situation. Having a one-on-one discussion with each team member (A) may be helpful, but it is time-consuming and may not address the root cause of the lack of participation. Documenting the behavior of the team members and highlighting it during their performance reviews (B) may be punitive and demoralizing, and it does not provide any constructive feedback or guidance. Identifying the team members who are not participating and reprimanding them © may be harsh and counterproductive, and it may create resentment and conflict within the team.