PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

A project manager who has team members around the world in different time zones should plan and schedule the tasks and work packages in a way that minimizes the dependency and communication gaps between the offices. This can be done by using techniques such as rolling wave planning, agile methods, or critical chain method, which allow for more flexibility and adaptability in the project schedule. The project manager should also consider the cultural differences, working hours, holidays, and availability of the team members when planning and scheduling the project work. This way, the project manager can avoid delays, conflicts, and misunderstandings caused by the geographical and time zone challenges. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 3: Project Performance Domain, Section 3.2: Schedule Performance, pp. 55-56

Project Management Professional (PMP) Handbook, Section 2.2: PMP Exam Content Outline, Domain II: Process, Task 2: Plan and manage project schedule, pp. 15-16

Managing Projects Across Time Zones, by ProjectManager.com, published on July 9, 2019

This is because the project manager should take action to resolve the issues that are hindering the project progress, rather than avoiding them, escalating them, or delaying them. Implementing plans to remove the obstacles may involve using a variety of problem-solving strategies, such as root cause analysis, brainstorming, negotiation, conflict resolution, and risk management3 .

The other options are not the best choices because:

A. Have the project team work on other activities: This is a passive and ineffective approach that does not address the root cause of the problem. It may also create more issues in the future, such as rework, schedule delays, scope creep, and quality defects.

C. Escalate to the project steering committee: This is a last resort option that should only be used when the project manager has exhausted all other means to remove the obstacles. Escalating to the project steering committee may indicate a lack of authority, responsibility, or competence of the project manager. It may also create unnecessary bureaucracy, conflict, and delay in the decision-making process.

D. Prioritize the obstacles for resolution: This is a necessary but not sufficient step to remove the obstacles. Prioritizing the obstacles helps the project manager to focus on the most critical and urgent issues, but it does not guarantee that they will be resolved. The project manager still needs to implement plans to remove the obstacles after prioritizing them.

I hope this helps you with your question. If you need more information, you can visit the following links:

[PMI’s Project Management Professional (PMP) certification]

[PMI’s A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 7th edition]

6 Obstacles to Any Project and How to Clear Them

Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers: How to Address and Remove Them

5 Ways to Overcome Project Obstacles

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should initiate the project by developing the project charter with the key stakeholders. The project charter should define the project objectives, scope, deliverables, success criteria, and high-level risks. The project charter should also establish the project vision, value proposition, and definition of done (DoD) for the agile project. The project charter should provide clarity and alignment among the project stakeholders and enable the agile team to deliver value to the customer in short iterations. Therefore, the project manager should schedule meetings with key stakeholders to build the agile project charter and set clear expectations for the project. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 37, 75-76, 286-287.

 the one that reflects the best practice of managing stakeholder expectations and communication, based on the project management plan and the stakeholder engagement plan. Reference: PMP Exam Set F – Q83 - This is a similar question with the same answer choices and a detailed explanation of why each option is correct or incorrect. It also provides a reference to the PMBOK Guide, Sixth Edition, page 518.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 13.1.1, “Stakeholder identification is the process of identifying the people, groups, or organizations that could impact or be impacted by a decision, activity, or outcome of the project, and analyzing and documenting relevant information regarding their interests, involvement, interdependencies, influence, and potential impact on project success.” Therefore, the project manager should conduct stakeholder identification and a project objectives review session, as this will help to ensure that the new key stakeholder is properly engaged and informed about the project scope and deliverables. Creating a change request and updating the scope management plan (option A) may not be necessary or appropriate, as the issue may not be related to the scope, but to the stakeholder’s expectations or understanding. Updating the stakeholder list and fixing the deliverables (option C) may not address the root cause of the issue, and may introduce unnecessary changes or rework. Updating the project management plan and lessons learned (option D) may be done later, after the issue is resolved and the stakeholder is satisfied. References:

PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 13.1.1

PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, page 180, question 14

A change request is a formal document that proposes a modification to some aspect of the project, such as the user requirements, the deliverables, the schedule, the budget, or the quality standards123. Change requests can originate from various sources, such as the stakeholders, the project team, the customer, or the environment12. Change requests need to be evaluated and approved before they can be implemented, as they may have significant impacts on the project performance, scope, cost, time, quality, and risk123.

The project scope statement is a document that defines and documents the project objectives, deliverables, requirements, assumptions, constraints, and acceptance criteria12. The project scope statement is the basis for making project decisions and controlling changes12. Therefore, the project manager should evaluate the change request against the project scope statement to determine if the change is necessary, feasible, and beneficial for the project123. The project manager should also consider the impact of the change on the other project components, such as the schedule, the budget, the quality, and the risk123.

The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to take next. Discussing approval of the change request in the next project meeting (A) may delay the decision-making process and cause confusion among the project team and stakeholders. Performing a risk assessment on the required change request (B) is an important step, but it should be done after evaluating the change request against the project scope statement, as the risk assessment may depend on the scope implications of the change. Asking the sponsor for more funds to cover the change request (D) is not appropriate, as the project manager should first determine if the change is justified and aligned with the project scope statement, and then explore alternative ways to accommodate the change within the existing budget or negotiate a trade-off with the sponsor. References: 123