PMP Exam Dumps - Project Management Professional (2025 Version)

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project resources, including materials, and ensuring that they are available and delivered on time. The project manager should also monitor and control the project risks, and implement appropriate responses when they occur. If one important material is still not on site and the delivery date is approaching, the project manager should engage the project team to look for alternatives to find a solution. This means that the project manager should involve the team members who have the relevant expertise, knowledge, and skills to identify and evaluate possible options to overcome the problem, such as using a substitute material, changing the design or scope, or negotiating with the supplier or the client. Engaging the project team to look for alternatives to find a solution will help the project manager to leverage the collective intelligence and creativity of the team, and to find the best solution that meets the project objectives and satisfies the stakeholders. Recording it in the risk register is not a sufficient action, as it does not address the problem or prevent the delay. The project manager should have identified and recorded this risk earlier, and developed a contingency plan to deal with it. Asking the client to help solve the problem is not a good option, as it may damage the relationship and trust between the project manager and the client, and imply that the project manager is not capable of managing the project. The project manager should communicate the problem to the client, but not rely on the client to solve it. Starting procuring this material from another supplier is a risky and costly option, as it may not guarantee the quality, availability, or delivery of the material, and it may incur additional expenses and contractual issues. The project manager should consider this option only after exhausting other alternatives, and with the approval of the relevant stakeholders. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 355-356, 441-442, 456-457.

 According to the PMI, a hybrid approach is a combination of two or more project methodologies, such as waterfall and agile, to suit the needs of the project. A hybrid approach can offer flexibility, adaptability, and customer focus, while also maintaining some level of predictability, structure, and control. However, a hybrid approach can also pose some challenges, such as stakeholder resistance, misalignment, or confusion. Therefore, the project manager needs to address and remove any obstacles and blockers that may prevent the team from achieving their goals. Obstacles and blockers are issues or impediments that hinder or stop the team’s progress, such as lack of resources, unclear requirements, technical debt, conflicts, communication gaps, etc. The project manager should follow these steps to address and remove obstacles and blockers for the team:

Identify the obstacles and blockers by using various techniques, such as daily stand-up meetings, retrospectives, feedback sessions, surveys, etc.

Analyze the impact, root cause, and priority of the obstacles and blockers by using tools, such as issue logs, risk registers, impact analysis, root cause analysis, prioritization matrix, etc.

Develop and implement solutions to remove the obstacles and blockers by using methods, such as problem-solving, negotiation, escalation, delegation, collaboration, etc.

Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the solutions by using measures, such as team velocity, customer satisfaction, quality metrics, etc.

Communicate and report the status and results of the solutions to the relevant stakeholders, such as the team, the sponsor, the customer, etc.

By addressing and removing obstacles and blockers for the team, the project manager can improve the project performance, as well as the team’s productivity, quality, morale, and collaboration.

The other options are not the best choices, because:

Asking stakeholders to communicate with the project manager and not directly with the team would create a communication bottleneck, reduce transparency, and increase the risk of misunderstanding or miscommunication.

Empowering the team members to remove obstacles and blockers would be a good practice, but it would not be sufficient without the project manager’s support, guidance, and intervention, especially if the obstacles and blockers are beyond the team’s authority or capability.

Adding blockers to the issue log and risk management plan would be a necessary step, but it would not be enough without taking action to resolve them. Simply documenting the blockers would not help the team to overcome them or improve their performance. References:

Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Methodology & Software - Teamhood

Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success

Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers: How to Address and Remove Them

1.7. Address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team - KnowledgeMap

1.7 Address and Remove Impediments, Obstacles, and Blockers … - BrainBOK

The stakeholder engagement plan and communication strategy are two key documents that guide the project manager in managing stakeholder expectations and interactions. The project manager should review these documents to identify the level of interest and influence of the stakeholder from the legal department, and determine the best way to communicate and involve them in the project. Escalating the issue to the project sponsor may not be necessary or appropriate at this stage, as the stakeholder may not be critical for the project success. Engaging the stakeholder and ensuring all requirements are captured may not be feasible or effective, as the stakeholder may not have any input or interest in the product design. Reviewing the product requirements and updating the stakeholder register may not address the root cause of the stakeholder’s lack of participation, as these documents do not specify how to engage and communicate with the stakeholder. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 13: Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.2: Plan Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.3: Manage Stakeholder Engagement, Section 13.4: Monitor Stakeholder Engagement

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 2: Planning, Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Engagement

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 5: Plan Stakeholder Engagement

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should use a collaborative or problem-solving approach to handle conflicts, as it results in a win-win situation and enhances the project performance1. The project manager should also communicate with the team members and involve them in the decision-making process, as it fosters trust and commitment2. Therefore, the best option is to meet the team member and try to plan a course of action together. Option A is incorrect because guiding the team member on how to resolve the conflict may not address the root cause of the conflict or the impact on the project schedule. Option B is incorrect because analyzing the project schedule and looking for alternatives may not consider the team member’s perspective or input. Option C is incorrect because performing crashing and/or fast tracking of the schedule may not resolve the conflict or may introduce new risks or issues to the project. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.5.2.1, p. 363 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 9.4.2.3, p. 356

According to the PMBOK Guide, an agile approach is based on delivering value in small increments and iterations, rather than in one large deliverable at the end of the project1. This allows the project team to incorporate feedback, changes, and learning into the product or service, and to reduce rework and dissatisfaction2. Therefore, the project manager should adopt an incremental cycle of delivering value to the customer, and align the project objectives and scope with the customer needs and expectations. The other options are incorrect because:

A. Decreasing the scope of the portfolio and sending new solutions to the customer is not an agile strategy, but a reactive one. It may imply that the project team is not able to deliver the agreed scope, or that they are not collaborating with the customer to understand their requirements and preferences.

B. Delivering a schedule with the portfolio timeline and delivery to the customer is not an agile strategy, but a predictive one. It may imply that the project team is following a rigid and fixed plan, rather than responding to changes and uncertainties in the project environment.

D. Preparing deliveries with more details to satisfy the customer is not an agile strategy, but a waterfall one. It may imply that the project team is focusing on documentation and specifications, rather than on working products and solutions. References:

1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.3, page 7

2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.8, page 52

: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2, Section 2.1.1, page 13

: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2, Section 2.2, page 14

According to the PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, an issue is a point or matter in question or in dispute, or a point or matter that is not settled and is under discussion or over which there are opposing views or disagreements1. Issues can arise from various sources, such as changes, risks, defects, conflicts, or assumptions1. Issues can affect the project performance, scope, quality, schedule, cost, or stakeholder satisfaction1.

An issues log is a project document used to capture and track issues until they are resolved1. The issues log typically contains information such as the issue description, priority, owner, status, resolution, and impact1. The issues log is updated throughout the project life cycle as new issues are identified, analyzed, and resolved1.

In this scenario, the newly assigned project manager is informed by a few key stakeholders that the project has some serious issues. The first thing that the project manager should do to understand the issues is to review the issues log to ensure the issues are captured. This will help the project manager to get an overview of the current state of the project, and to identify the nature, scope, and impact of the issues. It will also help the project manager to verify if the issues have been properly documented, prioritized, and assigned to the responsible parties. Reviewing the issues log will also enable the project manager to plan the next steps to address the issues, such as communicating with the stakeholders, performing root cause analysis, implementing corrective actions, or escalating the issues if needed1.

The other options are not as effective as option B. Option A, escalating the issues to the project sponsor, may be necessary if the issues are beyond the project manager’s authority or control, but it is not the first thing to do. The project manager should first review the issues log to understand the issues and their implications, and then decide if escalation is required or not. Option C, checking the risk management plan to ensure there is a strategy to address the issues, may be helpful, but it is not sufficient. The risk management plan provides guidance on how to manage risks, not issues2. Risks are uncertain events or conditions that may have a positive or negative effect on the project objectives, while issues are certain events or conditions that have already occurred and have a negative effect on the project performance1. Therefore, the risk management plan may not cover all the issues that the project faces, and the project manager should review the issues log instead. Option D, asking the key stakeholders to discuss the issues with the project team, may be beneficial, but it is not the first thing to do. The project manager should first review the issues log to get a clear picture of the issues, and then facilitate the discussion between the stakeholders and the team to resolve the issues.

 Earned value (EV) is a technique that measures the performance of a project by comparing the actual work completed with the planned work. It can help the PMO to report the project’s health in terms of schedule and cost variance, as well as the schedule and cost performance index. EV can be applied to both predictive and adaptive (agile) projects, as long as the project scope, schedule, and budget are defined and measurable. The PMO can use agile progress, such as the number of features delivered, user stories completed, or story points earned, as an input to calculate the EV KPls. This way, the PMO can provide upper management with the traditional reports that they are used to, while also reflecting the agile nature of the projects. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition, Chapter 7, Section 7.4.2.1

Practice Standard for Earned Value Management – Second Edition, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.3

Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.2