IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps - Internal Audit Function

Debt investments refer to financial instruments where an investor lends money to an entity (corporation, government, or institution) in exchange for periodic interest payments and the repayment of the principal amount at maturity. These include:

Government bonds (such as U.S. Treasury bonds, municipal bonds, and sovereign bonds)

Corporate bonds

Certificates of deposit (CDs)

Commercial paper

A. Investments in the capital stock of a corporation → Incorrect. Capital stock represents ownership (equity investments), not debt investments.

C. Contents of an investment portfolio → Incorrect. A portfolio may contain both equity and debt investments, making this too broad to classify specifically as debt.

D. Acquisition of common stock of a corporation → Incorrect. Common stock is an equity investment, not a debt investment.

The IIA’s Global Internal Audit Standards on Investment Management and Risk Assessment highlight debt instruments as fixed-income securities.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments) classify bonds and loans as debt investments, distinct from equity instruments.

The Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) – FASB ASC 320 specifies how to account for debt securities.

Explanation of the Other Options:IIA References & Best Practices:Thus, the correct answer is B. Acquisition of government bonds.

The chief audit executive may assist the audit committee or board in the external auditor selection process by helping determine or recommend selection criteria. Relevant criteria may include independence, competence, industry experience, audit methodology, regulatory knowledge, staffing, technology capability, fee structure, and communication approach. The CAE should not independently acquire the external audit service because appointment is normally a board or audit committee responsibility. Assessing appraisal and actuarial services is too narrow and not the main selection role. Identifying regulatory requirements may be useful, but it is not as central as establishing selection criteria. Internal audit’s role should support governance without taking over the board’s responsibility. Therefore, Option C is correct.

To test the accuracy of information already housed in a database on an un-networked computer, the auditor should select a sample of records and trace them to supporting documentation. This directly verifies whether stored database information is accurate, valid, and supported by source evidence. Submitting test transactions is more appropriate for testing system processing controls rather than validating existing database records. A test program simulating data entry also tests processing logic, not necessarily the accuracy of current data. Evaluating change management may be relevant to system integrity, but it does not directly prove that the data is accurate. Internal auditors should select the test approach that directly addresses the audit objective. Since the objective is data accuracy, Option C is correct.

Best practice and accounting standards require that receivables unlikely to be collected be written off to avoid overstating assets. Internal audit should recommend that management review the receivables and write off uncollectible debts accordingly.

Option A (escalation to the board) is premature; it should first be addressed with management. Option B (removing from cash flow statement) is not correct because write-offs affect the balance sheet and income statement, not just cash flows. Option D ignores a material risk of misstated financial statements.

Relevant cost refers to costs that will change depending on a specific business decision. It is crucial for decision-making as it helps management assess the financial impact of alternatives.

Relevant costs focus on future costs that differ between decision alternatives.

They help management analyze how different choices impact profitability.

This supports decision-making in areas such as pricing, outsourcing, and product discontinuation.

A. It explains the assumption that both costs and revenues are linear through the relevant range → Incorrect. While linear cost behavior is often assumed, it is not the primary purpose of relevant cost analysis.

B. It enables management to calculate a minimum number of units to produce and sell without having to incur a loss → Incorrect. This describes break-even analysis, not relevant cost analysis.

C. It enables management to predict how costs such as the depreciation of equipment will be affected by a change in business decisions → Incorrect. Depreciation is a sunk cost and is not considered relevant for decision-making.

The IIA’s Practice Guide: Financial Decision-Making and Internal Audit’s Role outlines how relevant cost analysis aids business strategy.

International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) Standard 2120 states that internal auditors should assess management’s cost-analysis techniques.

Managerial Accounting Concepts (by IMA and COSO) emphasize relevant costs in strategic decision-making.

Why Option D is Correct?Explanation of the Other Options:IIA References & Best Practices:Thus, the correct answer is D. It enables management to make business decisions, as it explains the cost that will be incurred for a given course of action.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

IT Governance ensures that IT strategies align with business objectives. The first step in IT governance is to define IT objectives, which guide all subsequent activities.

Option A (Identifying risk-mitigating options) is part of risk management but comes after setting objectives.

Option C (Identifying IT risk events) happens during risk assessment, not governance initiation.

Option D (Defining risk response policies) is a later stage in governance planning.

Since governance starts with setting clear IT objectives, B is the correct answer.

To assess the success of a piloted data analytics model in identifying anomalies in vendor payments and potential fraud, the most appropriate criterion is the accuracy of the model in identifying true positives—cases flagged as anomalies that were later confirmed as valid fraud risks.

Effectiveness of the Model: The primary goal of the model is to enhance the internal audit activity’s ability to detect fraudulent transactions. The best way to measure success is to analyze how many flagged transactions were confirmed as fraudulent or erroneous.

Reduction of False Positives and False Negatives: A model that generates too many false positives (incorrectly flagged transactions) can lead to inefficiencies, while too many false negatives (missed fraudulent cases) can reduce the effectiveness of fraud detection.

Alignment with Internal Audit Standards: According to IIA Standard 1220 - Due Professional Care, internal auditors must apply appropriate tools and techniques (such as data analytics) to enhance audit effectiveness. The model ' s success should be assessed based on its ability to provide reliable, actionable insights.

IIA Practice Guide on Data Analytics: Recommends assessing the predictive accuracy of models by comparing flagged transactions against actual outcomes.

B. The development and maintenance costs associated with the model (Incorrect)

While cost is a consideration, it does not directly assess the effectiveness of the model in detecting fraud.

High costs may indicate inefficiency, but they do not determine whether the model is accurately identifying fraudulent transactions.

IIA Standard 2100 - Nature of Work emphasizes that internal audit activities must contribute to the improvement of governance, risk management, and control, which requires a focus on results rather than just cost.

C. The feedback of auditors involved with developing the model (Incorrect)

Feedback is useful but subjective. The ultimate test of success is not auditor perception but whether the model correctly identifies fraudulent or anomalous transactions.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Data Analytics suggests that while stakeholder feedback is valuable, empirical validation (accuracy of flagged cases) should be the primary success measure.

D. The number of criminal investigations initiated based on the outcomes of the model (Incorrect)

While fraud detection can lead to investigations, the number of investigations is not necessarily an accurate measure of model success.

Some flagged cases may not lead to criminal investigations due to materiality, lack of sufficient evidence, or management decisions.

According to IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management, internal auditors must evaluate fraud risk management effectiveness, which includes detecting and preventing fraud, not just the legal consequences.

Explanation of Answer Choice A (Correct Answer):Explanation of Incorrect Answers:Conclusion:The best success criterion for the piloted data analytics model is the percentage of cases flagged by the model and confirmed as positives (Option A), as it directly measures the model ' s effectiveness in detecting actual fraud cases.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 1220 - Due Professional Care

IIA Standard 2100 - Nature of Work

IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Data Analytics