IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps - Business Knowledge for Internal Auditing

Logging at the database and application levels is a critical security control that enables monitoring, detecting, and investigating potential security incidents. The absence of logging significantly increases cybersecurity risks and can leave an organization vulnerable to undetected attacks.

Incident Response & Forensics: Without logs, the organization will be unable to determine the cause, origin, and impact of cyber incidents or system intrusions.

Compliance Requirements: Many regulatory frameworks (e.g., ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, GDPR, PCI-DSS, SOX) require logging for security monitoring and auditability.

Threat Detection: Logs help in identifying malicious activities, unauthorized access, and data breaches.

Accountability: Ensures that actions taken within the system can be traced back to specific users or administrators.

Option A (The organization will be unable to develop preventative actions based on analytics): While logging helps in analytics, its primary function is incident detection and forensic investigation.

Option B (The organization will not be able to trace and monitor the activities of database administrators): This is partially correct, but logging is not just for administrators—it is essential for monitoring all system activities, including unauthorized access attempts.

Option D (The organization will be unable to upgrade the system to newer versions): Logging does not impact system upgrades; upgrades are related to software lifecycle management, not logging practices.

IIA’s Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) – Information Security Controls recommends logging as a fundamental security control.

IIA Standard 2110 – IT Governance: Emphasizes the need for adequate IT risk management, including logging.

COSO Framework (Monitoring Component): Highlights the importance of system monitoring, which includes logging.

Why Option C is Correct:Why Other Options Are Incorrect:IIA References:Thus, the most appropriate answer is C. The organization will be unable to determine why intrusions and cyber incidents took place.

In accounting, the terms debit (Dr.) and credit (Cr.) refer to the two sides of an account in the double-entry accounting system.

Definition of Debit and Credit in Accounting:

Every financial transaction affects at least two accounts in a double-entry system: one account is debited, and another is credited.

Debits (Dr.) appear on the left side, while credits (Cr.) appear on the right side of an account.

Accounting Equation:

Step-by-Step Justification:Assets=Liabilities+Equity\text{Assets} = \text{Liabilities} + \text{Equity}Assets=Liabilities+Equity

Debits increase assets and expenses.

Credits increase liabilities, equity, and revenues.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Debit indicates the right side of an account and credit the left side ❌

Incorrect, as debits are always recorded on the left side, and credits are always on the right side.

B. Debit means an increase in an account and credit means a decrease. ❌

Partially incorrect; it depends on the type of account:

For assets and expenses, debits increase and credits decrease.

For liabilities, equity, and revenues, credits increase and debits decrease.

D. Credit means an increase in an account and debit means a decrease. ❌

Also incorrect because increases and decreases depend on the type of account (e.g., debits increase assets but decrease liabilities).

IIA Standard 1210.A1: Internal auditors must be familiar with fundamental accounting principles.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Financial Statements: Ensures proper understanding of debits and credits in financial reporting.

GAAP & IFRS Accounting Standards: Define how debits and credits are recorded in financial statements.

IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is C. Credit indicates the right side of an account and debit the left side. ✅

Remote wipe is not always 100% effective: While remote wiping can delete most user data, some residual data may remain on the device, especially in cases where:

The device has built-in storage redundancies.

Deleted data can be recovered using forensic tools.

The remote wipe command fails to execute properly due to network issues or device settings.

Security Risk: This limitation poses a risk for organizations handling sensitive or confidential data, as unauthorized individuals may recover wiped data.

IIA Standard 2110 - Governance: Internal auditors must assess how organizations manage IT security risks, including risks related to mobile devices and data protection.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Cybersecurity Risks highlights the need to evaluate mobile security controls and limitations of data removal techniques.

A. Encrypted data cannot be locked to prevent further access (Incorrect)

Encrypted data remains secure even if the device is lost.

Many enterprise security solutions allow organizations to revoke encryption keys remotely, making data inaccessible.

IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management advises that effective encryption reduces the impact of data loss.

B. Default settings cannot be restored on the device. (Incorrect)

Most remote wipe solutions allow factory reset, restoring the device to default settings.

Many mobile device management (MDM) tools support full device restoration.

D. Mobile device management software is required for a successful remote wipe. (Incorrect)

While MDM enhances remote wiping capabilities, it is not strictly required.

Some consumer and enterprise mobile operating systems (e.g., iOS, Android) provide built-in remote wipe functionality without MDM.

Explanation of Answer Choice C (Correct Answer):Explanation of Incorrect Answers:Conclusion:Remote wipe has limitations, and the inability to completely remove all data from the device (Option C) is a primary concern.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2110 - Governance

IIA Standard 2120 - Risk Management

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing Cybersecurity Risks

To enable management to receive timely feedback and mitigate unforeseen risks, it is critical to have a performance measurement system in place. Measuring product performance against an established standard is a key control mechanism that allows management to identify deviations, take corrective actions, and mitigate risks proactively.

Performance Monitoring & Timely Feedback: Comparing actual product performance against set standards helps in detecting quality issues, inefficiencies, or process failures early.

Risk Mitigation: Ensures that any deviations from expected performance can be addressed before they become major problems.

Internal Control Best Practices: Measuring against standards aligns with IIA’s risk management principles to ensure continuous monitoring and improvement.

Option B (Develop standard methods for performing established activities): While standardization improves efficiency, it does not provide ongoing feedback or mitigate unforeseen risks in real-time.

Option C (Require the grouping of activities under a single manager): Centralizing activities may improve coordination, but it does not directly provide timely performance feedback.

Option D (Assign each employee a reasonable workload): Managing workloads ensures efficiency but does not provide risk mitigation through performance monitoring.

IIA’s Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Requires internal auditors to assess whether an organization’s risk management processes enable timely risk identification and mitigation.

COSO’s Internal Control Framework (Performance Monitoring Component): Emphasizes measuring actual performance against expected outcomes as a fundamental internal control.

Why Option A is Correct:Why Other Options Are Incorrect:IIA References:Thus, the most appropriate answer is A. Measure product performance against an established standard.

A lump-sum contract (also known as a fixed-price contract) is a contract type where the vendor agrees to complete a project for a predetermined price. In this scenario, the organization agreed to pay the vendor $3,000,000 to design, procure, and construct a power substation.

Lump-Sum Contract (Correct Answer: B)

A lump-sum contract (also called a fixed-price contract) is an agreement where the contractor is responsible for completing the entire project at a set price.

This type of contract transfers cost risk to the contractor since they must manage expenses within the agreed budget.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management states that internal auditors should assess contract risks, including financial and performance risks in vendor contracts.

The contract price is predefined, which aligns with the scenario given in the question.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Cost-Reimbursable Contract (Incorrect)

A cost-reimbursable contract involves reimbursing the vendor for actual costs incurred, plus a fee or profit.

This is not applicable because the contract specifies a fixed price.

C. Time and Material Contract (Incorrect)

This contract type is based on actual time spent and materials used, typically used when scope is uncertain.

The given scenario clearly defines the project and budget, making this option unsuitable.

D. Bilateral Contract (Incorrect)

A bilateral contract refers to a mutual agreement between two parties where both have obligations.

While most contracts are bilateral in nature, this is not a specific contract type like lump-sum or cost-reimbursable contracts.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management (Evaluating contract risks)

IIA Standard 2210 – Engagement Objectives (Assessing vendor contracts)

IIA Standard 2130 – Compliance (Ensuring contract compliance)

Step-by-Step Justification:IIA References for This Answer:Thus, the correct answer is B. A lump-sum contract because the contract is based on a predefined, fixed price of $3,000,000.

A decentralized organizational structure allows decision-making authority to be distributed across various levels and locations, making it more flexible and adaptable to rapid changes and uncertainties.

Why Decentralization Helps in Uncertainty?

Decentralization empowers different units or teams to make faster decisions.

It enables quick adaptation to market shifts, technological advancements, and external disruptions.

According to IIA’s Organizational Governance Guidelines, decentralized structures increase agility and responsiveness, particularly in dynamic industries like technology and finance.

Characteristics of Decentralized Structures:

Autonomy at multiple levels – decisions are not centralized at the top.

Faster decision-making – local teams react quickly to changes.

Greater innovation and flexibility – promotes problem-solving without bureaucratic delays.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Centralized:

A centralized structure concentrates decision-making at the top, slowing down responsiveness to changes.

C. Departmentalized:

While departmentalization organizes work efficiently, it may restrict cross-functional collaboration, making adaptation slower.

D. Tall Structure:

Tall structures have multiple management layers, leading to bureaucracy and slower decision-making.

IIA Practice Guide: Organizational Governance

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance and Risk Management

COBIT 2019 – Enterprise Risk and Governance Framework

Step-by-Step Justification:IIA References:Thus, the correct and verified answer is A. Decentralized.