350-701 Exam Dumps - Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR 350-701)

Explanation

The Version 1 format was the initially released version. Do not use the Version 1 format unless you are using a legacy collection system that requires it. Use Version 9 or Version 5 export format.

Version 5 export format is suitable only for the main cache; it cannot be expanded to support new features.

Version 8 export format is available only for aggregation caches; it cannot be expanded to support new

features.

Explanation

The user “admin5” was configured with privilege level 5. In order to allow configuration (enter global

configuration mode), we must type this command:

(config)#privilege exec level 5 configure terminal

Without this command, this user cannot do any configuration.

Note: Cisco IOS supports privilege levels from 0 to 15, but the privilege levels which are used by default are privilege level 1 (user EXEC) and level privilege 15 (privilege EXEC)

RADIUS Change of Authorization (CoA) is a feature of Cisco ASA that allows VPN users to be postured against Cisco ISE without requiring an inline posture node. RADIUS CoA enables the ISE to send a message to the ASA to change the authorization attributes of an existing VPN session, such as the assigned IP address, ACL, or group policy. This way, the ISE can dynamically adjust the access level of the VPN user based on the posture assessment results, without the need for an intermediate device to enforce the policy change12. RADIUS CoA is supported by the ASA since version 9.2.13. References: 1: ASA Version 9.2.1 VPN Posture with ISE Configuration Example - Cisco 2: How To: ISE and ASA Integration using CoA for Posture - Cisco Community 3: How To Configure Posture with AnyConnect Compliance … - Cisco CommunityQUESTION NO: 94

What two mechanisms are used to redirect users to a web portal to authenticate to ISE for guest services?

(Choose two)

A. multiple factor auth

B. local web auth

C. single sign-on

D. central web auth

E. TACACS+

Answer: B, D

 Local web authentication (LWA) and central web authentication (CWA) are two mechanisms that are used to redirect users to a web portal to authenticate to ISE for guest services. Both methods involve the use of a redirect access control list (ACL) that allows the user to access only the web portal URL and blocks all other traffic until the user is authenticated. The difference between LWA and CWA is where the web portal and the authentication logic are hosted.

LWA: The web portal and the authentication logic are hosted on the wireless LAN controller (WLC). The WLC sends a RADIUS access-accept message to the network access device (NAD) along with the redirect ACL and the web portal URL. The NAD then redirects the user to the web portal on the WLC, where the user enters their credentials. The WLC verifies the credentials with the ISE and grants or denies access to the user. The advantage of LWA is that it does not require any configuration on the ISE, but the disadvantage is that it does not support advanced features such as posture assessment, profiling, or authorization policies.

CWA: The web portal and the authentication logic are hosted on the ISE. The WLC sends a RADIUS access-challenge message to the NAD along with the redirect ACL and the web portal URL. The NAD then redirects the user to the web portal on the ISE, where the user enters their credentials. The ISE verifies the credentials and sends a RADIUS access-accept message to the WLC with the authorization profile and the final ACL. The WLC then applies the authorization profile and the final ACL to the user session. The advantage of CWA is that it supports advanced features such as posture assessment, profiling, or authorization policies, but the disadvantage is that it requires more configuration on the ISE.

References :=

Configure Guest Access

Web Authentication Redirection to Original URL

Configure Local Web Authentication with External Authentication

This is a type of Outbreak Control list that allows the administrator to create a list of files based on their SHA-256 hash values that will be detected, blocked, and quarantined by the AMP for Endpoints connectors. The Simple Custom Detection list can be applied to a policy and synchronized with the devices that have the AMP connectors installed. This way, the administrator can prevent the execution of specific files without having to quarantine them on the devices.

The other options are incorrect because:

Advanced Custom Detection is a type of Outbreak Control list that allows the administrator to create custom rules based on file attributes, such as file name, size, path, or parent process. These rules can be used to detect and block files that match certain criteria, but they cannot be used to quarantine them.

Blocked Application is a type of Outbreak Control list that allows the administrator to create a list of applications based on their SHA-256 hash values that will be blocked from running on the devices that have the AMP connectors installed. However, this list does not detect or quarantine the applications, only prevents them from executing.

Isolation is a feature of AMP for Endpoints that allows the administrator to isolate a device from the network if it is compromised by malware. This prevents the device from communicating with other devices or the internet, but does not affect the files on the device.