L4M5 Exam Dumps - Commercial Negotiation

A perfectly competitive market is one with the following features:

- There are many firms producing identical or very similar (homogeneous) goods or services

- There are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market - anyone can enter or leave easily

- Both producers and customers have perfect knowledge of the market place, prices, costs of production and influences on demand and supply

Under these conditions, the price and quantity will always tend toward equilibrium as any producer that sets a price above equilibrium will not sell anything at all, and any producer that sets a price below a equilibrium will obtain 100% market share in theory. The demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. In a perfectly competitive market, it is difficult to increase profits through pricing, and suppliers instead must focus on their cost structure. As these conditions imply, there are few if any examples of perfectly competitive market.

LO 2, AC 2.2

A useful model of personal power that has survived the test of time and provide a simple way to analyse negotiation in French and Raven's Power Base Model, which describes six bases of power:

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production, for example, the costs of labour and materials directly used to produce the goods/services which the organisation sells.

According to the book 'Influencing: Skills and techniques for business success' by Fiona Dent and Mike Brent, there are two major influencing styles. Push tends to be directive. It tells, and is clear and resolute, but needs to be employed in situations where firmness is required because of difficulties that exist or weakness is evident. Pull is more participatory and collaborative. It seeks to incorporate everyone’s perspective. It can appear wishy-washy if not skilfully employed. Thatapproach should be followed which is most likely to secure commitment and not mere compliance.

The two divisions can be further divided into four style categories: directive; persuasive reasoning; collaborative – team oriented, people oriented to inspire them with a vision. The directive style relies on your expertise and reputation being respected by others, and where there really does seem to be one answer. It is "I" driven whereas persuasive reasoning is more "we" and issue driven. Directive styles can make the user appear as "a bull in a china shop"; persuasive reasoning can be portrayed as tough guy.

Collaborative influencing takes the "we" element further and seeks to mobilise everyone’s ideas in a journey of discovery. It may have the flavour of "I’m your best friend", which may not go down too well. Visioning style is concerned to stir people’s emotions in support of achieving an objective. This last one has been used by demagogues to stir people’s hearts and minds for evil purposes as well as good.

A useful table offers the benefits, problems, words and body language associated with each style along with advice on when to use and when to avoid each. Cases and exercises illustrate these styles.

Empathy comes in for extended treatment with the definition of "standing in the other's shoes". This does not necessarily happen just intuitively, and therefore before a specific influencing effort there should be an intense effort to think about the other person or persons and to sense what it might feel like to be them – their hopes, fears, concerns, what turns them on, what turns them off, where are they coming from.

A negotiating team can be as few as two people, and one person can play one or more of these roles:

As from the scenario, Jasmine will act as an observer and a scribe (or secretary).

Acollaborative win-win approachfocuses on mutual benefit and long-term value creation. This strategy is especially effective in strategic partnerships where trust, information sharing, and problem-solving are emphasized over competition.

“The collaborative win-win approach aims to create outcomes where both parties gain. This strengthens the relationship and leads to sustainable agreements built on trust and transparency.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Win-Win Negotiation Strategy)

Bargaining is the negotiation stage where tradeables are typically introduced and discussed. During this phase, both parties exchange offers and concessions, using tradeables such as lead times and order quantities to find a mutually acceptable agreement. This aligns with CIPS's guidance on the stages of negotiation.