L4M5 Exam Dumps - Commercial Negotiation

It has been said that most negotiations are won (or lost) at the preparation stage. Success in a negotiation cannot be claimed unless you can refer back to your objectives and show how you have achieve them. In broad terms, negotiation plans/strategies involve 4 key activities:

1. Developing and prioritising your objectives and limits

2. Seeking to understand TOP's objectives

3. Developing concession plans

4. Planning the resources and logistics required and agreeing team roles.

Questions to gain an understanding of why a negotiation failed

Did we collect and make effective use of all information available when preparing for the negotiation?

Did we set objectives for the negotiation that were stretching and achievable and established MIL objectives?

Did we determine a strategy for the negotiation?

Did the other party understand our needs correctly?

Were we aware of the underlying interests of the other party?

Were our proposals convincing enough for acceptance by the other party?

Did we explore different variables in the negotiation?

Did we fully understand all proposals?

Did we give any unplanned concessions and did we check the importance of these?

Did we focus on common interests?

Did we ask a range of questions?

Did we get answers to all our questions?

Could we answer all the questions addressed to us in a proper and positive way?

Did we summarise effectively?

Did we use different methods of persuasion in the negotiations?

Which tactics did we use and what effect did they have?

Did our negotiating team work well as a team?

Did we help to create a co-operative atmosphere

The agreement and closing phase is the phase when it is either clear through explicit language, or strongly suggested through non-verbal signals, that TOP is ready to move to agreement. Judging when to close can be difficult and as with phases of the negotiation, experience, observation, practice and reflection will be the best ways to learn here.

In the closing phase, procurement should:

- Watch for closing/buying signals

- Check to ensure all issues have been resolved

- Consider using visual aids to summarise

- Use 'summary close'

- Make a decision to conclude/close

- Seek agreement in principle if TOP does not have the final authority

- Make your own private notes on the final agreement

- Shake hands on the agreement

- Leave the meeting as soon as possible thereafter.

LO 3, AC 3.1

The zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) or bargaining range is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

The zone of proximal development refers to the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner.

There is no Walk away area. Walk away point is a position from which you cannot concede any more ground and must walk away/decline a deal.

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement is a fallback or backstop position if the negotiation fails to result in an agreement/no deal is agreed.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Integrative approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to create more of something of value to share, also known as collaborative approach or win-win. Integrative, interest-based negotiation can facilitate constructive, positive relationship and establishes contracts between parties on a foundation of goodwill. In integrative bargaining, both parties seek to 'expand the pie' by creating more value for both the buyer and the seller. Integrative negotiation ‘shares the pie’ and is interest rather than positional based.

In distributive bargaining, the focus is on claiming value and getting as much of the pie as parties can.

LO 1, AC 1.2

The assumption is false, because when a procurement professional negotiates on behalf of his employer, he brings the power of his organisation (its brand, reputation and purchasing spend) as well his own personal power (that which is embedded within him) to the negotiation.

From a negotiation perspective, both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the behaviours of other or the cause of event. This power is clearly core to negotiation, and of enormous important in seeking to achieve the objectives.