L4M5 Exam Dumps - Commercial Negotiation

Elasticity refers to the responsiveness of quantity demanded or quantity supplied to a change in price or another factor.

In microeconomic graphs, elasticity and inelasticity can be shown by the slope of the demand curve. If a demand curve is almost horizontal, then the product pricing can be described as very elastic. If a demand curve is almost vertical, then the product pricing can be described as very inelastic.

The formulae of elasticity:

Text Description automatically generated with low confidence

Table Description automatically generated with medium confidence

LO 2, AC 2.2

The Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. MBTI indicates personality preferences in four dimensions.

The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) is a conflict style inventory, which is a tool developed to measure an individual's response to conflict situations.

Mill's RESPECT mnemonic is set out by Harry A. Mills which describes seven steps to agreements

An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a total score derived from a set of standardized tests designed to assess human intelligence.

Understanding the key approaches to commercial negotiation—such as adversarial, integrative, collaborative, or accommodative—is fundamental to achieving successful outcomes. CIPS emphasises that negotiators must be able to select and apply the correct approach based on factors such as power balance, relationship importance, risk, and objectives. While understanding conflict, stakeholder power, and sourcing stages all support negotiation effectiveness, they are secondary to choosing the right negotiation approach itself. Without this core understanding, negotiators risk misalignment between strategy and context, leading to suboptimal or failed outcomes.

Late paymentsdamage trust and strain supplier cash flow, becoming a direct source of conflict. Similarly, when gains, risks, or costs arenot equitably shared, perceptions of unfairness can destabilize the relationship.

“Persistent late payments not only threaten supplier cash flows but can significantly erode trust. Additionally, disproportionate sharing of risks or benefits can create resentment and hinder collaboration.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.3 - Causes and Management of Conflict in Procurement)

With a collaborative supplier, the appropriate approach is Win–Win (integrative). Both sides aim to create savings while maintaining partnership value. Win–Lose would damage collaboration, while Lose–Lose sacrifices value on both sides. Win–Perceived Win is based on optics rather than actual balance. By adopting a win–win approach, Maria ensures sustainable cost reductions while protecting critical NHS supplier relationships.