L4M2 Exam Dumps - Defining Business Needs

Explanation

According to Porter's value chain, secondary activities consist of firm infrastructure, human re-source management, technology development and procurement.

Training is an example of human resource development, while information system is a part of firm infrastructure.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Explanation

Value analysis is a systematic review of the production, purchasing and product design processes to reduce overall product costs. This can be accomplished through a variety of activities, including the following:

- Designing products to use lower-tolerance parts that are less expensive

- Switching to lower-cost components

- Standardizing parts across product platforms in order to achieve volume discounts

- Altering production processes to minimize the amount of production cycle time, thereby reducing labor costs

- Introducing automation to strip labor costs out of the production process

- Altering product packaging to lower its cost while still protecting the product

The process is not a wholesale attack on costs. Costs are only reduced when the result will not im-pact the perceived level of quality experienced by customers, or the level of customer satisfaction.

Explanation

The bargaining power of supplier is a major determinant of the structure of an industry and also how much profit is available to organisation operating in that industry. Supplier is weak if:

- Substitutes are available and easy to access

- Suppliers are small and fragmented

- The industry is important to the seller

- The sellers' product or service is not an important of the industry's value chain

- The sellers' product or service is undifferentiated

- There are no significant switching costs

- There is no threat of forward integration.

Suppliers may have more power:

- If they are in concentrated numbers compared to buyers.

- If there are high switching costs associated with a move to another supplier.

- If they are able to integrate forward or begin producing the product themselves.

- If they have specific expertise or technology needed to manufacture goods.

- If their product is highly differentiated.

- If there are many buyers and none make up significant portions of sales.

- If there are no substitutes available.

- If there are strong end users who can exert power over the organization in favor of a supplier (This can be the case in labor situations).

In all of these cases, the bargaining power of suppliers is high to demand premium prices and set their own timelines.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Market Management)

CIPS L4M2 draws heavily on Porter’s Five Forces when explaining buyer and supplier power. A buyer’s bargaining strength increases when:

The buyer has alternatives or can make the product in-house (reduces supplier dependence).

The buyer represents a large portion of the supplier’s sales, giving the buyer leverage.

Therefore:

Statement 1 (make in-house) → strengthens buyer’s position.

Statement 4 (buyer’s spend = high proportion of supplier’s revenue) → supplier cannot risk losing the buyer, so buyer gains power.

Statements 2 and 3 → limited suppliers and high switching costs both reduce buyer power.

Hence, 1 and 4 only are correct.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Porter’s Five Forces model

Factors affecting buyer power and supplier dependence

Explanation

The procurement team in the scenario is analysing the difference between the plan and actual spend. This activity is known as variance analysis. The sum of all variances gives a picture of the overall over-performance or under-performance for a particular reporting period. For each item, companies assess their favorability by comparing actual costs to standard costs in the industry.

For example, if the actual cost is lower than the standard cost for raw materials, assuming the same volume of materials, it would lead to a favorable price variance (i.e., cost savings). However, if the standard quantity was 10,000 pieces of material and 15,000 pieces were required in production, this would be an unfavorable quantity variance because more materials were used than anticipated.