ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam Dumps - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam

Scenario 8: SunDee is an American biopharmaceutical company, headquartered in California, the US. It specializes in developing novel human therapeutics, with a focus on cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. The company has had an information security management system (ISMS) based on SO/IEC 27001 in place for the past two years. However, it has not monitored or measured the performance and effectiveness of its ISMS and conducted management reviews regularly

Just before the recertification audit, the company decided to conduct an internal audit. It also asked most of their staff to compile the written individual reports of the past two years for their departments. This left the Production Department with less than the optimum workforce, which decreased the company's stock.

Tessa was SunDee's internal auditor. With multiple reports written by 50 different employees, the internal audit process took much longer than planned, was very inconsistent, and had no qualitative measures whatsoever Tessa concluded that SunDee must evaluate the performance of the ISMS adequately. She defined SunDee's negligence of ISMS performance evaluation as a major nonconformity, so she wrote a nonconformity report including the description of the nonconformity, the audit findings, and recommendations. Additionally, Tessa created a new plan which would enable SunDee to resolve these issues and presented it to the top management

According to scenario 8, Tessa created a plan for ISMS monitoring and measurement and presented it to the top management Is this acceptable?

Scenario 3: Socket Inc. is a dynamic telecommunications company specializing in wireless products and services, committed to delivering high-quality and secure communication solutions. Socket Inc. leverages innovative technology, including the MongoDB database, renowned for its high availability, scalability, and flexibility, to provide reliable, accessible, efficient, and well-organized services to its customers. Recently, the company faced a security breach where external hackers exploited the default settings of its MongoDB database due to an oversight in the configuration settings, which had not been properly addressed. Fortunately, diligent data backups and centralized logging through a server ensured no loss of information. In response to this incident, Socket Inc. undertook a thorough evaluation of its security measures. The company recognized the urgent need to improve its information security and decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001.

To improve its data security and protect its resources, Socket Inc. implemented entry controls and secure access points. These measures were designed to prevent unauthorized access to critical areas housing sensitive data and essential assets. In compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards, Socket Inc. implemented pre-employment background checks tailored to business needs, information classification, and associated risks. A formalized disciplinary procedure was also established to address policy violations. Additionally, security measures were implemented for personnel working remotely to safeguard information accessed, processed, or stored outside the organization's premises.

Socket Inc. safeguarded its information processing facilities against power failures and other disruptions. Unauthorized access to critical records from external sources led to the implementation of data flow control services to prevent unauthorized access between departments and external networks. In addition, Socket Inc. used data masking based on the organization’s topic-level general policy on access control and other related topic-level general policies and business requirements, considering applicable legislation. It also updated and documented all operating procedures for information processing facilities and ensured that they were accessible to top management exclusively.

The company also implemented a control to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access. The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, regulations, and the information classification scheme. Network segregation using VPNs was proposed to improve security and reduce administrative efforts.

Regarding the design and description of its security controls, Socket Inc. has categorized them into groups, consolidating all controls within a single document. Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information about information security threats and integrate information security into project management.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 3, did Socket Inc. comply with ISO/IEC 27001 organizational controls regarding its operating procedures?

Which factor should be considered when estimating the consequences of a security event?

Scenario 5: Bytes iS a dynamic and innovative Company specializing in the design, manufacturing. and distribution Of hardware and software, with a focus On providing comprehensive network and supporting

services. It is headquartered in the vibrant tech hub of Lagos, Nigeria. It has a diverse and dedicated team, boasting a workforce of over 800 employees who are passionate about delivering cutting-edge solutions

to their Clients. Given the nati-jte Of its business. Bytes frequently handles sensitive data both internally and When collaborating With Clients and partners.

Recognizing the Challenges inherent in securely sharing data with clients. partners, and within its own internal operations. Bytes has implemented robust information security measures, They utilize a defined risk

assessment process, which enables them to assess and address potential threats and information security risks. This process ensures compliance with ISOflEC 27001 requirements, a critical aspect of Bytes'

operations.

Initially. Bytes identified both external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that impact its ability to achieve the intended information security management System Outcomes, External issues

beyond the company'S control include factors Such as social and Cultural dynamics, political. legal. normative, and regulatory environments, financial and macroeconomic conditions. technological developments,

natural factors, and competitive pressures. Internal issues, which are within the organization's control, encompass aspects like the company's culture. its policies, objectives, and strategies; govetnance structures.

roles, and responsibilities: adopted standards and guidelines; contractual relationships that influence processes within the ISMS scope: processes and procedures resources and knowledge capabilities; physical

infrastructure information systems. information flows. and decisiorwnaking processes; as well as the results of previous audits and risk assessments. Bytes also focused on identifying the interested parties

relevant to the ISMS understanding their requirements, and determining which Of those requirements will be addressed by the ISMS

In pursuing a secure digital environment, Bytes leverages the latest technology, utilizing automated vulnerability scanning tools to identify known vulnerable services in their ICT systems. This proactive approach

ensures that potential weaknesses are swiftly addressed. bolstering their overall information security posture. In their comprehensive approach to information security, Bytes has identified and assessed various

risks. During this process, despite implementing the security controls, Bytes' expert team identified unacceptable residual risks, and the team Currently faces uncertainty regarding which specific options to for

addressing these identified and unacceptable residual risks.

According to scenario 5, what should Bytes consider when assessing the security of its ICT systems?

Scenario 8: SecureLynx is one Of the largest cybersecurity advisory and consulting companies that helps private sector organizations prevent security threats. improve security systems. and achieve business

SecureLynr is committed to complying with national and international standards to enhance the company'S resilience and credibility_ SecureLynx has Started implementing an ISMS based on ISO/IEC 27001

as part of its relentless pursuit of security.

As part of the internal audit activities. the top management reviewed and approved the audit objectives to assess the effectiveness of SecureLynx•s ISMS During the audit, the internal auditor evaluated whether

top management Supports activities associated with the ISMS and if the toles and responsibilities Of relevant parties are Clearly defined. This rigorous examination is a testament to SecureLynx'S

commitment to continuous improvernent and alignment of security measures with organizational goals.

SecureLynx employs an innovative dashboard that visually represents implemented processes and controls to ensure transparency and accountability within the Organization. This tool Offers stakeholders a real-

time overview of security measures. empowering them to make informed decisions and swiftly respond to emerging threats. As part of this initiative, Paula was appointed to a new position entrusted with the

responsibility Of collecting, recordlng, and Stoting data to measure the effectiveness Of the ISMS-

Furthermore, SecureLynx conducts management reviews every six months to ensure its Systems are robust and continually improving. These reviews serve as a crucial mechanism for assessing the efficacy Of

security measures and identifying areas for enhancement. SecureLynx's dedication to implementing and maintaining a robust ISMS exemplifies its commitment to innovation and Client satisfaction.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.

According to Scenario 8, did SecureLynx follow the recommended steps when reviewing and approving the internal audit objectives?

NeuroTrustMed is a leading medical technology company based in Seoul, South Korea. The company specializes in developing AI-assisted neuroimaging solutions used in early diagnosis and treatment planning for neurological disorders. As a data-intensive company handling sensitive patient health records and medical research data, NeuroTrustMed places a strong emphasis on cybersecurity and regulatory compliance. The company has maintained an ISO/IEC 27001-certified ISMS for the past three years. It continuously reviews and improves its ISMS to address emerging threats, support innovation in medical diagnostics, and maintain stakeholder trust. As part of its commitment to continual improvement, NeuroTrustMed actively tracks potential nonconformities, performs root-cause analyses, implements corrective and preventive actions, and ensures all changes are documented and aligned with the company’s strategic objectives. When a new data protection regulation came into effect affecting cross-regional data handling, the information security team conducted a gap assessment between current policies and the new regulation. Then, it updated relevant documentation and processes to meet compliance. Following these revisions, NeuroTrustMed updated the ISMS documentation and added a new entry in the improvement register. The register, maintained in the form of a structured spreadsheet, included a unique change number, a description of the update, and a high-priority classification due to legal compliance, the dates of initiation and completion, and the sign-off by the information security manager. Around the same period, during a scheduled management review, the information security team also identified a pattern of onboarding errors. While these had not resulted in any data breaches, they posed a risk of unauthorized access. In response, the onboarding procedure was revised and an automated verification step was added to ensure accuracy before access is granted. To understand the underlying cause, the team collected data on the provisioning process. They analyzed process logs, interviewed onboarding staff, and traced access errors back to a misconfigured step in the HR-to-IT handover workflow. The team validated this finding through test cases before implementing any changes. Once confirmed, the information security team documented the nonconformity in the ISMS log. The documentation included a description of the issue, impacted systems, affected users, and a brief risk assessment of potential consequences related to access management. Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.

Based on scenario 10, Mauve required the establishment of a new auditor due to a perceived conflict of interest Is this acceptable?

Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.

In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.

During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.

SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.

In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 8, which of the following performance indicators was NOT established by SunDee?

Question:

Which of the following would be an acceptable justification for excluding the Annex A 6.1 Screening control?