ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

Identifying the source of information

Sampling available data

Gathering audit evidence

Verifying objective evidence

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria

Making audit conclusions

Evaluating against the audit criteria

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.4, the process of collecting and verifying information during an audit involves the following steps1:

Identifying the source of information: The audit team should identify the sources of information that are relevant to the audit objectives, scope and criteria. These sources may include documents, records, personnel, processes, activities, facilities, equipment, etc. The audit team should also determine the methods and tools for accessing and collecting the information, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc.

Sampling available data: The audit team should select a representative sample of the available data to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the management system. The sample size and selection method should be based on the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the level of confidence and risk. The audit team should also consider the validity, reliability, relevance and sufficiency of the data.

Gathering audit evidence: The audit team should use the methods and tools identified in the previous step to collect audit evidence, which is the records, statements of fact or other information that are relevant to the audit criteria and verifiable. The audit team should record the audit evidence in a clear, concise and objective manner, using notes, checklists, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.

Verifying objective evidence: The audit team should verify the accuracy, completeness and authenticity of the audit evidence collected. This may involve cross-checking different sources of information, confirming the identity and authority of the persons providing the information, examining the original documents or records, etc. The audit team should also identify any discrepancies, inconsistencies or gaps in the audit evidence.

Evaluating evidence against the audit criteria: The audit team should compare the audit evidence with the audit criteria to determine the extent of conformity and nonconformity. The audit team should also identify any opportunities for improvement, best practices, positive aspects or potential risks. The audit team should use professional judgement and apply the principles of auditing when evaluating the audit evidence.

Making audit conclusions: The audit team should consolidate the audit findings and evaluate the overall performance and effectiveness of the management system. The audit team should also consider the audit objectives, scope and criteria, as well as the context and expectations of the auditee and other interested parties. The audit team should provide a clear, concise and objective statement of the audit conclusions, which may include the degree of conformity, the achievement of the intended outcomes, the need for corrective actions, the suitability for certification, etc.

Evaluating against the audit criteria: The audit team should review the audit conclusions and ensure that they are consistent with the audit criteria and supported by sufficient and appropriate audit evidence. The audit team should also ensure that the audit conclusions are communicated to the auditee and other relevant parties in a timely and effective manner, using the agreed audit report format and distribution method.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

ISO 9001:2015 emphasizes the importance of communication as part of an effective Quality Management System (QMS).

Clause References:

Clause 7.4 (Communication): This requires organizations to establish what, when, with whom, and how communication should take place to ensure effectiveness.

Quality Management Principle – Engagement of People: Effective communication allows stakeholders (employees, suppliers, customers) to fully participate and contribute to quality objectives.

Why is the Correct Answer A?

Appropriate communication means ensuring that messages are clear, relevant, and accessible to the intended audience.

Different stakeholders (employees, customers, regulatory bodies, suppliers) may require different formats, languages, or media to ensure they fully understand and engage.

This aligns with ISO 9001:2015, which emphasizes that communication must be tailored to the needs of the recipient for maximum effectiveness.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

B (Timely responses) → Important but does not specifically refer to appropriateness in communication.

C (Communicating processes and assumptions to all interested parties) → Communication should be relevant; sharing all details might not be necessary or appropriate.

D (Only top management handling external communication) → Communication must be distributed across relevant functions, not restricted to leadership.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.2, an audit plan should include the following information:

The audit objectives, scope, and criteria

The audit team members and their roles and responsibilities

The audit schedule, including the sequence and timings of audit activities, such as opening meeting, document review, interviews, observations, closing meeting, etc.

The expected time and duration of each audit activity and location

The name and contact details of the auditee’s representative and other relevant parties

The allocation of appropriate resources to support the audit activities

The audit methods and techniques to be used, such as interviews, observations, sampling, etc.

The audit documents and records to be prepared and retained

The audit language and communication methods

The audit risks and opportunities and how to address them

The audit follow-up arrangements, if applicable

Therefore, the correct answer is D and F, as they are essential elements of an audit plan. The other options are either irrelevant or optional for an audit plan. References:

ISO 19011:2018(en), Guidelines for auditing management systems, clause 6.3.2

ISO 19011: Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems | ASQ, section “Making audit arrangements”

ISO 19011 Management Systems Audit Checklist | Process Street, task 6.3.2

Establishing the audit programme objectives

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities

Establishing the audit programme

Initiating the audit

Preparing all audit activity

Conducting the audit activities

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5, the audit programme is a set of one or more audits planned for a specific time frame and directed towards a specific purpose. The audit programme includes all activities necessary to plan, organize, and conduct the audits. The audit programme management involves the following steps1:

Establishing the audit programme objectives: The audit programme objectives define the intended outcomes of the audit programme, such as verifying conformity, evaluating performance, identifying improvement opportunities, etc. The audit programme objectives should be aligned with the strategic direction and policies of the organization and the needs and expectations of the interested parties.

Determining and evaluating the audit programme risks and opportunities: The audit programme risks and opportunities are the factors that can affect the achievement of the audit programme objectives, such as changes in the internal or external context, availability of resources, competence of auditors, etc. The audit programme risks and opportunities should be identified, analyzed, and evaluated to determine the appropriate actions to address them.

Establishing the audit programme: The audit programme is established by defining the audit programme scope, criteria, methods, and resources. The audit programme scope defines the extent and boundaries of the audit programme, such as the processes, functions, sites, activities, etc. that will be audited. The audit programme criteria are the set of policies, procedures, or requirements used as a reference for the audits. The audit programme methods are the techniques used to conduct the audits, such as interviews, observations, document review, sampling, etc. The audit programme resources are the human, technical, and financial resources needed to implement the audit programme.

Initiating the audit: The audit initiation is the process of formally establishing the arrangements for an individual audit within the audit programme. The audit initiation involves contacting the auditee and the audit client, confirming the audit objectives, scope, and criteria, and obtaining the necessary information and access for the audit.

Preparing all audit activity: The audit preparation is the process of developing the audit plan and the audit work documents for an individual audit. The audit plan is a document that provides the basis for agreement regarding the conduct of the audit, such as the audit schedule, the audit team, the audit methods, the audit language, the audit report, etc. The audit work documents are the records that provide evidence of the audit activities, such as the audit checklist, the audit notes, the audit findings, etc.

Conducting the audit activities: The audit activities are the processes of collecting and verifying audit evidence and evaluating it against the audit criteria to make the audit conclusions. The audit activities include the opening meeting, the communication during the audit, the roles and responsibilities of the audit team and the auditee, the audit evidence collection and verification, the audit findings generation and recording, the closing meeting, and the audit report preparation and distribution.

Non-conformity Report

ISO 9001 Clause Number:

7.2

Nature of problem:

Documented information is not retained on the necessary competence of consultants with respect to relevant regulatory and ISO 9001 requirements.

ISO 9001 requirement that has not been fulfilled:

ISO 9001 – “The organization shall retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.”

ISO 9001:2015 places a clear requirement on organisations to ensure that persons doing work under its control that affects performance and conformity are competent, and that this competence is demonstrated and evidenced.

Relevant ISO 9001 requirements

Clause 7.2 – Competence requires the organisation to:

determine the necessary competence of persons doing work under its control,

ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience, and

retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.

In the scenario:

Competence decisions are entirely delegated to a subcontracted lead consultant.

No documented information is retained to demonstrate individual consultant competence.

A recent event could not be resolved specifically due to the absence of documented competence records, which directly confirms non-fulfilment of Clause 7.2.

Reliance on customer satisfaction results or the personal judgement of a consultant does not replace the ISO 9001 requirement for objective evidence.

Why other clauses are not applicable:

Clause 7.1 relates to provision of resources, not evidence of competence.

Clause 7.3 relates to awareness of quality objectives, not competence records.

Statements such as “consultants are not aware of customer satisfaction objectives” or “persons necessary are not determined” are not supported by the scenario evidence.

ISO-aligned conclusion:

The organisation has failed to retain documented information as evidence of competence for consultants providing ISO 9001 and regulatory consultancy services. This is a clear and justified nonconformity against ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.2.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.3.3, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised as necessary to address changes that occur during the audit planning. The audit plan should be agreed upon, preferably in writing, by the audit team leader, the audit client and the auditee1. Therefore, if there is a significant change in the auditee’s situation, such as the cancellation of all orders for the next week, the audit plan should be reviewed and revised accordingly, with the agreement of all parties involved.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.1.4, the certification body should have a process to ensure that the audit team has the competence to achieve the audit objectives, and that the audit methods are appropriate for the scope and complexity of the audit. The certification body should also have a process to ensure that the audit is conducted under reasonable conditions and within a reasonable time frame2. Therefore, if there is a risk that the audit objectives cannot be achieved, or that the audit methods are not suitable, due to the change in the auditee’s situation, the certification body should be consulted and informed on how to proceed with the audit.

Therefore, the best action to take is B, ask the certification body you work for how to proceed with the audit. This action will ensure that the audit plan is revised and agreed upon by all parties, and that the audit team has the competence and the methods to conduct the audit effectively and efficiently. The other options are not correct, as they may compromise the quality and validity of the audit:

•A. Start the audit on Monday at ABC’s as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and plan visits to ABC customers wherever they may be working during the following week: This action may not be feasible or acceptable, as it may extend the audit duration and cost beyond the agreed terms, and it may not provide sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to verify the conformity and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•C. Start the audit on Monday as planned, interviewing the functions that regularly work at the central office, and visit another customer’s premises they cleaned the week before: This action may not be relevant or reliable, as it may not reflect the current performance and condition of the auditee’s processes. The audit evidence collected from the previous customer may not be valid or representative of the audit criteria, and it may not address the risks and opportunities associated with the auditee’s context and objectives. Moreover, this action may not be agreed upon by the audit client and the auditee, and it may not be approved by the certification body.

•D. Complete the audit but ask the quality manager to clean some windows at the ABC’s office, simulating the process they carry out at customers’ premises: This action may not be objective or impartial, as it may introduce bias and influence in the audit process. The audit evidence collected from the simulated process may not be accurate or authentic, and it may not demonstrate the actual capability and effectiveness of the auditee’s processes. Moreover, this action may not be ethical or professional, as it may compromise the integrity and credibility of the audit and the certification.