ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Completeness ensures that all necessary audit evidence, observations, and findings are properly documented, which is critical for traceability and accountability in an audit.

While transparency and fair presentation are principles of auditing, completeness is specifically related to maintaining audit work documents, as required in ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.5.4 (Preparing Audit Work Documents).

According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

•Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.

•Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.

•Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved.

•Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.

•Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.

In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider’s performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

According to the guidance on conducting the audit closing meeting1, the audit team leader should provide a summary of the audit findings and conclusions, invite discussions, and agree on timelines for any corrective actions. The audit team leader should also be respectful, constructive, and objective when presenting the nonconformities, and avoid any personal or emotional comments. The audit team leader should also consider the impact of the disruptive event (such as the Covid-19 pandemic) on the auditee’s context, interested parties, and risks2, and acknowledge any good practices or improvements observed during the audit. Therefore, option D is the best option, as it follows the best practices for the closing meeting and allows the auditee to understand the nonconformities and their implications, and to participate in the analysis and resolution of the issues. Option A is not correct, as it is not respectful, constructive, or objective, and it does not invite any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also assumes that the audit team leader has the authority to recommend the removal of the supplier from the approved list, which may not be the case. Option B is not correct, as it does not provide enough information or explanation to the auditee, and it does not allow any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, acknowledging any good practices, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. Option C is not correct, as it does not involve the other managers who are responsible for the functions or processes that were audited, and who may have valuable input or information to share. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, inviting discussions, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. References: 1: Conducting the Audit Closing Meeting: Sharing the Results2: Auditing ISO 9001:2015 in the Context of a Disruptive Event.

A → 8.4.3.a

B → 7.2.b

C → 10.2.2

D → 10.2.1

E → 6.2

F → 5.2.2.c

8.4.3.a – No specification is issued to the suppliers of waste plastic:This clause refers to the information provided to external providers, including requirements for products and services. If no specification is issued, it means the organization is not complying with this clause, which states:

“The organization shall ensure that the requirements for the products and services to be provided are adequately defined prior to communication to the external provider.”

7.2.b – The picking operators have been trained:This falls under Competence requirements. Clause 7.2(b) requires that persons are competent on the basis of education, training, or experience:

“Ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience.”

10.2.2 – No documentation is retained for rejected materials:This relates to corrective action documentation. Clause 10.2.2 requires organizations to retain documented information as evidence of nonconformities and actions taken:

“The organization shall retain documented information as evidence of: the nature of the nonconformities and any subsequent actions taken…”

10.2.1 – The rejected materials are segregated:This links to the treatment of nonconforming outputs. Clause 10.2.1 discusses actions such as containment or segregation for nonconforming outputs:

“Deal with nonconforming outputs in one or more of the following ways: correction; segregation, containment…”

6.2 – Management has set an objective for the level of recycling:This refers to quality objectives. Clause 6.2 requires that measurable quality objectives be established, and this includes setting performance targets:

“The organization shall establish quality objectives at relevant functions… The quality objectives shall be measurable…”

5.2.2.c – The quality policy appears in promotional material:Clause 5.2.2(c) requires the quality policy to be available to relevant interested parties. Using it in promotional material ensures that it is communicated externally:

“The quality policy shall be… available to relevant interested parties, as appropriate.”

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

According to ISO 17021-1:2015 (Conformity Assessment – Requirements for Certification Bodies), Clause 9.3.1.2, the Stage 1 Audit typically consumes around 30% of the total audit time.

This time is allocated to:

Reviewing documented information.

Assessing the readiness for Stage 2.

Identifying potential nonconformities.

A 20% allocation (Answer A) is too low, and 40% (Answer C) is excessive, as the majority of the audit should be spent on Stage 2 (on-site verification).