ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

According to the guidance on conducting the audit closing meeting1, the audit team leader should provide a summary of the audit findings and conclusions, invite discussions, and agree on timelines for any corrective actions. The audit team leader should also be respectful, constructive, and objective when presenting the nonconformities, and avoid any personal or emotional comments. The audit team leader should also consider the impact of the disruptive event (such as the Covid-19 pandemic) on the auditee’s context, interested parties, and risks2, and acknowledge any good practices or improvements observed during the audit. Therefore, option D is the best option, as it follows the best practices for the closing meeting and allows the auditee to understand the nonconformities and their implications, and to participate in the analysis and resolution of the issues. Option A is not correct, as it is not respectful, constructive, or objective, and it does not invite any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also assumes that the audit team leader has the authority to recommend the removal of the supplier from the approved list, which may not be the case. Option B is not correct, as it does not provide enough information or explanation to the auditee, and it does not allow any discussion or feedback from the auditee. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, acknowledging any good practices, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. Option C is not correct, as it does not involve the other managers who are responsible for the functions or processes that were audited, and who may have valuable input or information to share. It also does not follow the best practices for the closing meeting, such as providing a summary of the audit, inviting discussions, and agreeing on timelines for corrective actions. References: 1: Conducting the Audit Closing Meeting: Sharing the Results2: Auditing ISO 9001:2015 in the Context of a Disruptive Event.

In the context of ISO 9001:2015 audits, it is the audit team leader who holds the responsibility for assigning work to the audit team. According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for auditing management systems, which complements ISO 9001:2015), the audit team leader is responsible for the organization and direction of the audit, including assigning specific roles and responsibilities to audit team members. This includes preparation of the audit plan, leading the audit, and ensuring that each team member understands their tasks.

Match the process descriptions below to the process names:

The process by which the accuracy of test equipment is checked against a known standard. = Calibration

The process by which a product or service is visually examined to determine conformity to requirements. = Evaluation

The process by which data is examined in detail to reach a specific answer or answers. = Analysis

The process by which a parameter of a product or service is examined to determine a specific value. = Measurement

According to the ISO 9000:2015 - Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary, the definitions of the process names are as follows:

Calibration: operation that, under specified conditions, in a first step, establishes a relation between the quantity values with measurement uncertainties provided by measurement standards and corresponding indications with associated measurement uncertainties and, in a second step, uses this information to establish a relation for obtaining a measurement result from an indication.

Evaluation: determination of the suitability, adequacy or effectiveness of an object to achieve established objectives.

Analysis: detailed examination of the elements or structure of something.

Measurement: process to experimentally obtain one or more quantity values that can reasonably be attributed to a quantity.

Therefore, the process descriptions can be matched to the process names based on these definitions.

This option reflects a balanced and professional approach. The audit team leader should first gather information directly from the involved auditor to understand the situation before making any decisions. It demonstrates due diligence and fairness.

This ensures that the situation is properly escalated and handled in accordance with the auditing body’s procedures. Consulting the audit programme manager helps ensure consistency in handling such incidents.

The nonconformity raised is based on objective evidence, independent of the incident with the photographs. ISO 9001 audits are evidence-based, and the validity of the findings should not be compromised by unrelated issues.

1. A. Advise the Quality Manager that he, as audit team leader, needs to speak to the auditor about the situation and he will report back to the Quality Manager once this is done:2. D. Delay the Closing meeting until the audit team leader has consulted his audit programme manager at Head Office:3. E. Insist that the nonconformities must stand since they have been agreed by the team from other evidence gathered:

B. Advise the Quality Manager that the auditor will be reported to Head Office:

Reporting the auditor directly without first investigating the situation is premature and unprofessional. It might escalate the issue unnecessarily.

C. Apologize for the situation and ensure the Quality Manager that all photographs will be deleted during the Closing meeting:

Deleting evidence without proper consultation could be seen as tampering or unprofessional conduct. It’s essential to understand the context of the photographs first.

F. State that the auditor will take no further part in the audit and all his photographs will be deleted:

This is an extreme response without first investigating the situation. Taking unilateral action without gathering facts can damage the audit's integrity.

Why Not the Other Options:

•To evaluate the preparedness of the organisation for a Stage 2 audit: This objective involves assessing the readiness of the organisation to undergo the Stage 2 audit, where the conformity and effectiveness of the quality management system will be verified123. The audit team will check the level of implementation and understanding of the quality management system, identify any major gaps or nonconformities, and confirm the audit scope, criteria, and plan123.

•To review the quality manual: This objective involves reviewing the documented information of the quality management system, such as the quality policy, the quality objectives, the scope, the processes, and the procedures, to ensure that they meet the requirements of ISO 9001:2015123. The audit team will also evaluate the organisation’s understanding and application of the standard, and identify any areas of improvement or concern123.

The other options are not included in the objectives of the Stage 1 initial certification audit, according to the web search results from my internal tool. They may be related to other stages or types of audits, but they are not the focus of the Stage 1 audit.

Therefore, the correct answer is B and D.

According to ISO 9001:2015, clause 9.1.1, the organization is required to determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results, and when the monitoring and measuring shall be performed. The organization is also required to retain appropriate documented information as evidence of the results.

Therefore, in the scenario given, the organization should have planned for monitoring and measuring the billet temperature, as it is a critical factor for the quality of the product and the process. The organization should also have established a procedure that provides instruction in taking billet temperature, using the pyrometer or other suitable methods, to ensure consistency and accuracy. The organization should also have performed periodic analysis of the results of temperature checks, to identify trends, problems, and opportunities for improvement.

Hence, the options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001 are A, E, and F, as they are aligned with the requirements of the clause. The other options are either irrelevant or not directly related to clause 9.1.1, as they do not pertain to the monitoring and measurement of the billet temperature.

Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:

Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause 6.2.1).

Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.

Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 & 6.2.2).

Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.

Analysis of Options:

A. Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation's personnel:Incorrect. While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause 9.1 (Performance Evaluation).

B. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant's interpretation of ISO 9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant's role.

C. Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.

D. Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation's quality policy:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization’s quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.

E. The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect. Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.

F. Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.

Why Options D and F Are Correct:

D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause 6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.

F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.

Relevant References:

Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.

Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.

Clause 5.1.1: Top management's responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.