ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps - QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

Clause 8.2.4 of ISO 9001:2015 – Changes to Requirements for Products and Services:ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.2.4 states that when changes to requirements for products or services are made, they must be communicated and agreed upon with relevant interested parties (in this case, the Health Trust). The lack of communication and agreement for substituting the cleaning chemical represents a clear violation of this clause.

Analysis of the Corrective Action Proposed:The organization proposed "obtaining a concession from the Health Trust for the use of the new chemical." This action is reactive and assumes approval from the Health Trust without addressing the systemic issue: the lack of a defined change control process for managing contract changes.

Option Analysis:

A. The substitute chemical has not been used before in the Health Trust:Incorrect. While this may be a concern, it is not directly relevant to the root cause of the nonconformity, which is the absence of a process to handle contract changes.

B. The action assumes that the Health Trust will agree to the change:Incorrect. Although this is true, it is not the primary issue. The nonconformity lies in the lack of a structured approach to obtain agreement, not whether the Health Trust agrees.

C. Staff have not been trained in the use of the new chemical:Incorrect. This is a separate issue related to staff competence (Clause 7.2), but it is not the main reason why the corrective action is unacceptable under Clause 8.2.4.

D. The process for making changes to the contract has not been addressed:Correct. The fundamental issue is the organization's failure to follow or establish a change control process for amending contracts, including gaining formal agreement from the Health Trust. The proposed corrective action does not ensure that such issues will be systematically prevented in the future.

E. The substitute chemical may not be as effective as the original:Incorrect. The effectiveness of the substitute chemical is secondary to the primary issue, which is the lack of a change management process.

ISO 9001 References Supporting the Correct Answer:

Clause 8.2.4: Requires that changes to product/service requirements be reviewed, communicated, and agreed upon with the customer.

Clause 10.2 (Nonconformity and Corrective Action): Requires the organization to address the root cause of the nonconformity and take actions to ensure it does not recur. In this case, the root cause is the absence of a change control process.

Why D is the Best Answer:The core issue is that the organization did not have a formalized process for managing and agreeing upon changes to contract requirements. Addressing this process gap is essential to prevent recurrence of similar nonconformities. Merely seeking a concession from the Health Trust is a one-off solution that does not address the systemic issue.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Audit evidence includes information collected through different methods to assess compliance with ISO 9001:2015 requirements.

Clause References:

ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.6 – Audit Evidence: Audit evidence must be objective, verifiable, and based on facts.

ISO 9001:2015, Clause 9.1.1 – Monitoring, Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation: Requires organizations to collect and analyze data from multiple sources to verify effectiveness.

Types of Audit Evidence Collected in Scenario 3:

Verbal Evidence – Employee interviews regarding training and awareness sessions.

Documentary Evidence – Organizational charts, job descriptions, training records.

Physical Evidence – Workplace observations to assess working conditions.

Why is the Correct Answer B?

The audit team used a combination of verbal (interviews), documentary (records), and physical (site observations) evidence.

This triangulation approach enhances audit reliability and ensures compliance verification.

Why are the Other Options Incorrect?

A (Confirmative evidence) → Not a formal audit term in ISO 9001 or ISO 19011.

C (Analytical evidence) → Incorrect, as analysis was not a primary method used.

D (Qualitative evidence only) → Incorrect because the audit involved both qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (documents, physical) evidence.

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 6.6.2, a nonconformity is the non-fulfilment of a requirement. A nonconformity can be classified as either major or minor, depending on the nature and extent of the deviation from the audit criteria. A major nonconformity is a nonconformity that affects the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results. A minor nonconformity is a nonconformity that does not affect the ability or the integrity of the organization’s management system to achieve the intended results, but is a deviation from the audit criteria1.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015, clause 9.4.9, the organization is required to analyze the cause and describe the specific correction and corrective actions taken, or planned to be taken, to eliminate detected nonconformities, within a defined time. The organization is also required to provide the certification body with records and evidence of the implementation and effectiveness of the correction and corrective actions taken. The certification body will then verify the correction and corrective actions taken by the organization and decide on the certification status2.

Therefore, the two options of when the organization is required to act in response to reported findings are D and F, as they indicate the presence of nonconformities that need to be corrected and prevented from recurring. The other options are not correct, as they do not require the organization to act in response to reported findings:

•A. A recommendation is given in the report: A recommendation is a suggestion for improvement that is not related to a nonconformity. A recommendation is not binding for the organization and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to accept or reject the recommendation, but it is not required to act on it.

•B. A finding of good practice is reported: A finding of good practice is a positive observation that indicates a strength or a best practice of the organization’s management system. A finding of good practice is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to acknowledge or share the finding of good practice, but it is not required to act on it.

•C. An opportunity for improvement is raised: An opportunity for improvement is a potential area where the organization’s management system can be enhanced or optimized. An opportunity for improvement is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to pursue or ignore the opportunity for improvement, but it is not required to act on it.

•E. A finding of conformity is reported: A finding of conformity is a confirmation that the organization’s management system fulfils the audit criteria. A finding of conformity is not related to a nonconformity and does not affect the certification status. The organization may choose to celebrate or communicate the finding of conformity, but it is not required to act on it.

Table

Statement

First-party audits

Second-party audits

Third-party audits

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited.

Yes

No

No

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard.

No

No

Yes

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability.

No

Yes

No

Here is a brief explanation of each statement:

The audit scope is typically determined by the organisation being audited: This statement applies to first-party audits, also known as internal audits, where the organisation audits its own processes and activities to ensure conformity and improvement1. The organisation can decide the scope of the audit based on its own needs and objectives2. This statement does not apply to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier, or third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation. In these cases, the audit scope is determined by the customer or the certification body, respectively34.

The outcome of the audit is typically certification to a recognised standard: This statement applies to third-party audits, where an independent body audits the organisation to verify that it meets the requirements of a specific standard, such as ISO 9001, and issues a certificate of conformity if the audit is successful34. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or second-party audits, where the outcome of the audit is not certification, but rather self-improvement or supplier qualification13.

The audit scope is typically confined to service/product provision capability: This statement applies to second-party audits, where the customer audits the supplier to ensure that they are meeting the requirements specified in the contract, such as service or product quality, delivery, or performance34. The audit scope is usually focused on the specific aspects of the service or product that are of interest to the customer3. This statement does not apply to first-party audits or third-party audits, where the audit scope is broader and covers the entire quality management system or the relevant clauses of the standard14.

As the audit team leader, it is crucial to manage differing opinions constructively and ensure that the correct clause is selected for the nonconformity based on solid evidence. Here’s how the situation should be handled:

E. Invite you and the second auditor to fully explain your point of view and then decide which clause to select: This promotes collaboration and transparency, allowing both auditors to present their rationale for choosing the specific clause.

F. Review the evidence with you and the second auditor, and then decide which clause of ISO 9001 would best apply: Reviewing the evidence in relation to the specific requirements of ISO 9001 is essential for determining which clause is most appropriate.

H. Try to obtain a consensus between you and the second auditor after a discussion of the different opinions: Consensus-building is a crucial skill for an audit team leader. Achieving agreement ensures the nonconformity is addressed accurately and with full team support.

Options such as overruling immediately (D) or deferring the decision without full discussion (B) could undermine team dynamics and the audit process. Consulting the quality manager (A) or selecting an entirely different clause (G) is unnecessary, as the team should resolve the issue internally​​.

According to clause 8.4 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should ensure that externally provided processes, products, and services conform to the specified requirements. To do so, the organization should:

•Establish the criteria for the selection, evaluation, and re-evaluation of external providers, based on their ability to provide processes, products, and services in accordance with the requirements. The criteria should be documented and applied consistently.

•Evaluate the potential external providers before selecting them, using the established criteria. The evaluation methods may include questionnaires, audits, references, samples, etc. The results of the evaluation should be documented and reviewed.

•Select the external providers that have demonstrated their competence and conformity to the requirements. The selection should be based on the evaluation results and the organization’s needs. The selection should be documented and approved.

•Communicate the requirements for the processes, products, and services to be provided by the external provider, including the verification and validation activities, the acceptance criteria, the documentation requirements, the changes control, etc. The communication methods may include purchase orders, contracts, agreements, etc. The communication should be clear, complete, and timely.

•Monitor the performance and conformity of the external provider, using the established criteria and methods. The monitoring methods may include inspections, tests, audits, feedback, complaints, etc. The monitoring results should be documented and analyzed.

In this case, the evidence statements that demonstrate a nonconformity with clause 8.4 are A and C, because they show that the organization did not retain documented information of the selection and evaluation of the external provider, and the monitoring of the external provider’s performance. These are requirements of the standard and essential for ensuring the quality of the externally provided processes, products, and services. The other options are not directly related to clause 8.4, although they may indicate other nonconformities or weaknesses in the organization’s QMS. For example, option B may relate to clause 7.1.3 on contingency planning, option D may relate to clause 8.2.3 on review of requirements, option E may relate to clause 8.6 on release of products and services, and option F may relate to clause 5.1.1 on leadership and commitment. References: ISO 9001:2015, [ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Scope], Mastering the Scope of ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Clause 8.5.3 – Property Belonging to Customers or External Providers:This clause requires the organization to care for customer property while it is under their control. If there is damage, they must inform the customer and retain documented information. Thus, informing customers of the reason for laundry damage relates directly to this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.3

Clause 7.1.3 b – Infrastructure:It refers to the provision and maintenance of infrastructure necessary for the operation of processes. This includes equipment. If resources are not allocated for outdated equipment, it directly breaches this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.3 b

Clause 10.2.1 b – Corrective Action:This clause covers actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities to prevent recurrence, including evaluating and correcting customer complaints.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.1 b

Clause 5.1.2 b – Customer Focus (Top Management):Top management must ensure risks to customer satisfaction, including property damage, are addressed. This aligns with addressing the risk of damaging customer laundry.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 5.1.2 b

Clause 6.2 – Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them:Setting objectives for reducing customer complaints (like those about laundry damage) falls under this clause.🔎 Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.2