N10-009 Exam Dumps - CompTIA Network+ Certification Exam

Role of the Hosts File:

The hosts file is a local file on a computer that maps hostnames to IP addresses. It can be used to override DNS resolution by providing a static mapping of a hostname to an IP address.

Common Issues with the Hosts File:

If an incorrect IP address is mapped to a hostname in the hosts file, it can cause the computer to resolve the hostname to the wrong IP address. This can lead to navigation issues for specific websites while other users, relying on DNS, do not face the same problem.

Why Other Options are Less Likely:

Self-signed certificate: Relates to SSL/TLS and would cause a security warning, not a navigation failure.

Nameserver record: Affects all users, not just one.

IP helper: Used to forward DHCP requests and is unrelated to DNS resolution issues.

Troubleshooting Steps:

Check the hosts file on the affected user's computer (C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts on Windows or /etc/hosts on Unix/Linux).

Look for entries that map the problematic hostname to an incorrect IP address and correct or remove them.

To support about 800 workstations with minimal IP waste, you choose the smallest subnet that provides at least 800 usable host addresses. In IPv4, usable hosts per subnet are calculated as 2^(host bits) − 2 (subtracting network and broadcast addresses). A /22 leaves 10 host bits (32 − 22 = 10), providing 2^10 − 2 = 1024 − 2 = 1022 usable addresses—enough for 800 devices with relatively low waste.

Check the other options: /23 leaves 9 host bits, giving 2^9 − 2 = 512 − 2 = 510 usable addresses, which is not enough. A /21 provides 2^11 − 2 = 2048 − 2 = 2046 usable addresses—enough, but wastes more than /22. A /20 provides 2^12 − 2 = 4096 − 2 = 4094 usable addresses—much more waste.

Therefore, 10.0.100.0/22 is the best choice that meets the workstation requirement while minimizing unused addresses.

The correct answer is SLA (Service Level Agreement) because it is a formal, documented contract between a service provider and a customer that defines expected service standards. According to CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) objectives under network operations and service management concepts, an SLA outlines measurable performance metrics such as uptime percentage, response time, throughput, support availability, escalation procedures, and responsibilities of both parties.

An SLA ensures accountability and establishes clear expectations for service delivery. For example, a vendor may guarantee 99.99% uptime, define maximum resolution times for incidents, and specify penalties or credits if performance targets are not met. SLAs are critical in cloud services, ISP agreements, managed services, and enterprise vendor contracts.

An MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) is a non-binding agreement outlining general terms between parties but does not define enforceable service metrics. EOL (End of Life) refers to when a product is no longer sold or supported. EOS (End of Support) indicates when a vendor stops providing updates or assistance for a product.

Therefore, an SLA is the correct document that defines vendor-delivered service requirements.

Top of Form

Understanding TTL (Time to Live):

TTL is a value in a DNS record that tells how long that record should be cached by DNS servers and clients. A higher TTL value means that the record will be cached longer, reducing the load on the DNS server but delaying the propagation of changes.

Impact of TTL on DNS Changes:

When an MX record change is made, it may take time for the change to propagate across all DNS servers due to the TTL setting. If the TTL is high, old DNS information might still be cached, leading to email being directed to the old server.

Best Practice Before Making DNS Changes:

To ensure that changes to DNS records propagate quickly, it is recommended to reduce the TTL value to a lower value (such as 300 seconds or 5 minutes) well in advance of making the changes. This ensures that any cached records will expire quickly, and the new records will be used sooner.

Verification of DNS Changes:

After reducing the TTL and making the change to the MX record, it is important to verify the propagation using tools like dig or nslookup.

Comparison with Other Options:

Change the email client configuration to match the MX record: Email clients generally do not need to match the MX record directly; they usually connect to a specific mail server specified in their settings.

Perform a DNS zone transfer prior to the MX record change: DNS zone transfers are used to replicate DNS records between DNS servers, but they are not related to the propagation of individual record changes.

Update the NS record to reflect the IP address change: NS records specify the DNS servers for a domain and are not related to MX record changes.

If the three new employees can communicate with each other’s devices, that strongly suggests their local Layer 2/Layer 3 connectivity is working (same VLAN/subnet, switching is fine, and they have IP addressing that allows local communication). The fact that they cannot access company resources (often on other subnets, servers, or the internet via internal routing) points to a problem with how these new endpoints are being addressed or routed beyond their local segment.

The most likely shared root cause affecting only “new employees” is DHCP scope/pool configuration. If the DHCP pool is exhausted, mis-scoped, or handing out incorrect options (such as an incorrect default gateway, wrong subnet mask, or an address range tied to an isolated VLAN), users could still talk locally but fail to reach resources outside their subnet. Modifying the DHCP server pool (expanding the scope, correcting the scope network, or ensuring the correct options are assigned) would resolve this with minimal changes.

A gateway routing table issue would typically affect many users, not just three new ones. DNS misconfiguration on the router would more commonly cause name-resolution problems, not block all resource access (and wouldn’t be isolated to only new employees). A workstation firewall would not usually prevent access to “company resources” in a way that consistently affects three new devices while still allowing peer connectivity.

Understanding 2.4GHz Interference:

The 2.4GHz frequency range is commonly used by many devices, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and various industrial equipment. This can lead to interference and degraded performance.

Mitigation Strategies:

5GHz Frequency:

The 5GHz frequency band offers more channels and less interference compared to the 2.4GHz band. Devices operating on 5GHz are less likely to encounter interference from other devices, including industrial equipment.

Non-overlapping Channels:

In the 2.4GHz band, using non-overlapping channels (such as channels 1, 6, and 11) can help reduce interference. Non-overlapping channels do not interfere with each other, providing clearer communication paths for Wi-Fi signals.

Why Other Options are Less Effective:

Mesh Network: While useful for extending network coverage, a mesh network does not inherently address interference issues.

Omnidirectional Antenna: This type of antenna broadcasts signals in all directions but does not mitigate interference.

Captive Portal: A web page that users must view and interact with before accessing a network, unrelated to frequency interference.

Ad Hoc Network: A decentralized wireless network that does not address interference issues directly.

Implementation:

Switch Wi-Fi devices to the 5GHz band if supported by the network infrastructure and client devices.

Configure Wi-Fi access points to use non-overlapping channels within the 2.4GHz band to minimize interference.

A Content Delivery Network (CDN) stores cached versions of content in edge locations to deliver data faster and more reliably to users based on geographical proximity.

From Andrew Ramdayal’s guide:

“CDNs distribute content to multiple, geographically dispersed servers. This enhances performance and reliability for end-users by reducing latency and load times.”