LLQP Exam Dumps - Life License Qualification Program (LLQP)

In Ontario, the pension legislation stipulates that a spouse is entitled to receive a minimum of 50% of the member’s pension benefits as a survivor benefit if the member dies. This applies to defined benefit pension plans (DBPP), which provide a predetermined benefit upon retirement. Therefore, as the spouse of Maria, Juan would be entitled to receive at least half of Maria’s pension upon her death, as specified by Ontario pension regulations. This survivor benefit is a guaranteed right and requires consent from both spouses for any reduction or waiver. Options C and D are incorrect as Ontario law mandates a minimum 50% survivor benefit without provision for reduction to 25%, and Juan's entitlement is tied to their marital status and statutory rights, which may not apply if they are separated or divorced at the time of Maria's death. Option A is incorrect because Ontario legislation does not provide for an increased benefit by waiving the survivor benefit​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: The CSF Code of Ethics (Section 11) prohibits advisors from denigrating competitors, requiring professionalism in client interactions. Alexandre can’t disparage the FinCode advisor despite the public disciplinary record. Option C—emphasizing his unique approach—focuses on his strengths, encouraging business ethically without criticism. Option A (check CSF records) indirectly highlights the competitor’s fault, risking denigration. Option B (departure dispute) introduces irrelevant negativity. Option D (past experience) could lead to prohibited criticism. The Ethics manual promotes positive differentiation over competitor critique, making C the compliant choice.

When a beneficiary is designated as "revocable" and predeceases the policyholder, their share of the benefit typically reverts to the surviving beneficiaries rather than the deceased beneficiary’s estate. In this case, since Michelle has predeceased Danny, her portion of the benefit is divided equally between Donna-Joe and Stephanie, the remaining beneficiaries. Therefore, each of them would receive 50% of the total death benefit, which is $500,000. If the beneficiaries had been designated as "irrevocable" or if there were specific contingent beneficiaries, different rules might apply​​.

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under the Civil Code of Quebec (Article 2415), a policyholder (or subscriber) is the entity that owns and pays for an insurance or annuity contract, which can be an individual or a legal person like a corporation. Xtra, as a company, can use its retained earnings (unregistered capital) to fund an annuity contract and be designated as the policyholder, making option D correct. Option A is false, as legal persons can own contracts (e.g., group insurance). Option B’s requirement of a registered plan is incorrect—annuities can be funded with non-registered funds. Option C introduces a “subrogated annuitant,” a misnomer here, as the annuitant is the person receiving payments, not a decision-maker, and no such requirement exists. The LLQP and Ethics manual confirm that corporations can be policyholders for business purposes, like key person coverage or investments.

In the case of life insurance where a subrogated policyholder is designated, that individual (in this case, Natalya) would assume ownership rights of the policy upon the original policyholder’s death. Since Kirill named Natalya as the subrogated policyholder, she would become the new policyholder upon his death, regardless of the fact that Kirill did not have a will. This designation bypasses the estate, meaning the executor or other family members (like Katya) do not assume ownership. This outcome aligns with LLQP guidelines on succession planning and the assignment of life insurance ownership​​.

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Gold’s role as a financial security advisor, per the Distribution Act (Section 16), requires him to act competently and in the client’s best interest. Tax advice, wills, and mandates in case of incapacity (Civil Code, Articles 2166–2174) often exceed an advisor’s expertise, necessitating referral to specialists like tax experts and notaries. By not proposing such collaboration, Gold risks providing incomplete or inaccurate advice, breaching his duty of care to the client (option B). Option A (the public) is too broad, as no public harm is evident. Option C (other professionals) is unaffected, as no direct duty to them is breached. Option D (the profession) could apply indirectly via reputational harm, but the primary breach is to the client. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual mandates advisors to recognize their limits and refer clients appropriately.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Segregated funds are investment products offered by life insurers, combining insurance and investment features. Under Quebec’s Civil Code (Article 2457), proceeds from life insurance contracts, including annuities, are exempt from seizure if the beneficiary is the policyholder’s spouse, ascendant, descendant, or an irrevocable beneficiary. Segregated funds qualify for this protection because they are structured as annuity contracts, distinguishing them from mutual funds. Option A correctly identifies this legal protection tied to beneficiary designation. Option B misattributes the protection to the AMF Guideline, which regulates segregated funds but does not grant seizure exemption—that stems from the Civil Code. Option C overgeneralizes, as not all insurance products are exempt (e.g., recent contributions may be contested under Article 2459). Option D focuses on the guarantee, which is a feature of segregated funds, but the creditor protection hinges on the insurance contract status and beneficiary rules, not the guarantee alone. The Ethics manual requires advisors to explain legal protections accurately.

As Paulette is injured during work and is covered by her employer’s group disability plan, her disability benefits would be paid out under this group insurance policy. Group disability insurance provides both short- and long-term coverage, as outlined in her employer’s benefits plan. This plan typically covers income replacement for non-workplace injuries or illnesses. However, since this was an on-the-job accident, it may be covered by the CNESST, but group insurance often still serves as the primary provider in situations where a workplace injury results in short-term disability exceeding standard workplace injury benefits. The SAAQ would only cover injuries directly related to road accidents within its jurisdiction. Employment insurance (EI) provides general income replacement but is secondary to employer-provided group disability benefits​​.

=================