LLQP Exam Dumps - Life License Qualification Program (LLQP)

Under the LLQP Group Benefits and Group Savings curriculum, eligibility for group insurance benefits such as medical and dental coverage is typically subject to a waiting period, especially for new employees. This waiting period is a standard feature of group insurance contracts and is designed to manage risk for the insurer by preventing immediate claims shortly after employment begins.

A waiting period usually lasts between three and six months, depending on the terms of the group policy. During this time, employees may complete enrolment forms, but coverage does not become effective until the waiting period has been satisfied. This principle applies regardless of whether the employee is otherwise eligible or intends to participate in other employer-sponsored plans.

The key distinction in this question is between group insurance benefits (medical and dental) and group savings plans such as a GRRSP. While Jack’s employer offers both, eligibility rules differ. A GRRSP often allows employees to begin contributing immediately upon employment, and employer matching contributions may vest over time. However, vesting schedules relate only to ownership of employer contributions, not to eligibility for participation in group insurance coverage. Therefore, Option B is incorrect.

Option A is also incorrect because there is no legislated waiting period tied to GRRSP contributions that governs eligibility for group insurance benefits. Option C is incorrect because group plan renewal dates apply to the employer’s contract with the insurer, not individual employee eligibility.

The LLQP study materials emphasize that group insurance eligibility is most commonly determined by a standard waiting period, which must be completed before coverage becomes effective. Once this period ends, Jack will become eligible to participate in the medical and dental plans.

Therefore, based on LLQP-approved group benefits rules, the correct and fully verified answer is Option D: At the end of a standard waiting period.

According to the LLQP Segregated Funds and Annuities curriculum, one of the most distinctive and valuable features of segregated funds is the death benefit guarantee. This guarantee plays a critical role in estate planning, particularly for older clients or those with health concerns who want certainty about the minimum amount their beneficiaries will receive.

In George’s situation, he is 72 years old and has known medical conditions, which heightens the likelihood that death may occur before the segregated fund reaches maturity. By investing $1 million in a segregated fund and naming his daughters as beneficiaries, George ensures that a guaranteed minimum amount—typically 75% or 100% of the original deposits, less withdrawals—will be paid to his beneficiaries if he dies while the contract is in force. This guarantee applies regardless of market performance at the time of death.

This feature directly explains George’s peace of mind. Even if markets decline significantly before his death, the death benefit guarantee ensures that his daughters will still receive at least the guaranteed amount under the segregated fund contract. As a result, George can confidently allocate the remainder of his estate to a charitable cause, knowing that his daughters’ inheritance is protected from adverse market conditions.

The other options do not adequately explain George’s planning outcome. While exemption from probate fees can speed up estate settlement, it does not guarantee the value of the investment. Assuris protection applies only if the insurer becomes insolvent and does not protect against market losses. The ability to reset guarantees can increase future guaranteed amounts, but it is not the fundamental feature that ensures protection at death.

The LLQP curriculum emphasizes that death benefit guarantees are a cornerstone advantage of segregated funds, particularly for estate planning and beneficiary protection. Therefore, the correct and fully verified answer is Option B: The death benefit guarantee.

Upon maturity, the new guarantee becomes the current market value, and the new maturity date is based on contract terms, often depending on the age of the client or a specific reset term.

Exact Extract:

"When a segregated fund contract matures, the new guarantee is based on the current market value, and a new maturity date is set according to the client’s age or the insurer’s terms."

(Reference: Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.2 Growth Secured by Reset【45:0†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.pdf**)

One of the significant advantages of segregated funds is creditor protection, which is particularly beneficial for business owners and professionals who may face potential claims from creditors. Under LLQP principles, segregated funds are insurance contracts, and when beneficiaries such as spouses or children are named, the investment may be protected from creditors in the event of bankruptcy or legal action. This makes segregated funds distinct from other investment types, which do not inherently offer creditor protection unless specific trusts or structures are in place​​.

Option A is incorrect as Assuris provides limited coverage rather than full protection, Option B is partially true but not unique to segregated funds, and Option D is incorrect as segregated funds typically do not require medical underwriting.

Dario violated his duties and obligations towards the public by engaging in aggressive and unsolicited solicitation tactics. According to LLQP ethical guidelines, insurance agents must conduct themselves in a manner that upholds the integrity and reputation of the profession. This includes respecting the public’s privacy and avoiding high-pressure sales tactics​.

The behavior described, where Dario persistently contacts Andrew and sends unsolicited gifts, can be seen as harassment, which is inconsistent with the standards expected of insurance representatives when interacting with the public. LLQP guidelines emphasize the importance of professionalism, transparency, and respect towards potential clients​.

Assuris protects policyholders against the risk of an insurance company failure. Segregated fund contracts are covered by Assuris guarantees, which ensure continuity of benefits up to certain limits.

Exact Extract:

"Assuris is the not-for-profit organization that protects Canadian policyholders if their life insurance company fails. Benefits related to segregated funds are covered up to certain limits."

(Reference: Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.11 Investor Protection​)

This question is a direct application of the time value of money concept—specifically present value (PV)—as taught in the LLQP Segregated Funds and Annuities material. Present value “works backwards from a future date” and answers the question: how much is needed now to achieve a future savings goal. The LLQP text provides the formula:

PV = FV ÷ (1 + interest rate)ⁿ

Here, Davy’s future goal is FV = $200,000, the annual return is 3% (0.03), and the time horizon is n = 10 years. Substituting into the LLQP formula:

PV = 200,000 ÷ (1.03)¹⁰

(1.03)¹⁰ ≈ 1.343916, so:

PV ≈ 200,000 ÷ 1.343916 ≈ $148,818.9, which rounds to $148,819.

Therefore, if Davy has at least $148,819 in his RRSP today and earns an average of 3% per year for the next 10 years with no additional contributions, he should reach approximately $200,000 by age 65.

This aligns exactly with the LLQP explanation that PV calculations are used “to help a person determine how much needs to be saved today to yield a specified pension at a future date.”

According to the LLQP Segregated Funds and Annuities and Investment & Savings curriculum, one of the most effective income-tax-saving strategies for couples with unequal incomes is the use of a spousal RRSP. A spousal RRSP allows the higher-income spouse to contribute to an RRSP that is registered in the lower-income spouse’s name, while still claiming the tax deduction personally.

In this case, Mathieu earns $80,000 and is therefore in a higher marginal tax bracket than Mireille, who earns only $20,000 working part-time. From a tax-planning perspective, RRSP contributions are most valuable when deducted against higher income, because they reduce taxable income at a higher marginal rate. The LLQP study materials emphasize that RRSP contribution limits are determined by the contributor’s unused RRSP room, not the planholder’s room when using a spousal RRSP.

Although Mireille has $30,000 of unused RRSP room, that amount is irrelevant if Mathieu is the contributor. Mathieu has $80,000 of unused RRSP contribution room, which means he can contribute up to $80,000 into a spousal RRSP in Mireille’s name. Mathieu would receive the full tax deduction, reducing his taxable income significantly, while the funds would belong to Mireille for future retirement income purposes.

This strategy also supports income splitting in retirement, which is a key LLQP planning concept. When Mireille withdraws funds from the spousal RRSP in retirement (subject to attribution rules), the income will be taxed in her hands at a lower marginal tax rate, further reducing the family’s overall tax burden.

Options C and D are incorrect because Mireille, as the lower-income spouse, would gain little immediate tax benefit from making RRSP contributions. Option A is incorrect because it incorrectly limits Mathieu’s contribution to Mireille’s unused RRSP room rather than Mathieu’s own contribution limit.

Therefore, under LLQP-approved tax planning principles, the correct strategy is Option B, where Mathieu contributes up to $80,000 to an RRSP in Mireille’s name.