CISM Exam Dumps - Certified Information Security Manager

The first step to gain approval for outsourcing to address a security gap is to perform a cost-benefit analysis, because it helps to evaluate the feasibility and viability of the outsourcing option and compare it with other alternatives. A cost-benefit analysis is a method of estimating and comparing the costs and benefits of a project or a decision, in terms of financial, operational, and strategic aspects. A cost-benefit analysis can help to:

Identify and quantify the expected costs and benefits of outsourcing, such as the initial and ongoing expenses, the potential savings and revenues, the quality and efficiency of the service, the risks and opportunities, and the alignment with the business objectives and requirements

Assess and prioritize the criticality and urgency of the security gap, and the impact and likelihood of the related threats and vulnerabilities

Determine the optimal level and scope of outsourcing, such as the type, duration, and frequency of the service, the roles and responsibilities of the parties involved, and the performance and security standards and metrics

Justify and communicate the rationale and value proposition of outsourcing, and provide evidence and support for the decision making process

Establish and document the criteria and process for selecting and evaluating the outsourcing provider, and the contractual and legal terms and conditions

A cost-benefit analysis should be performed before submitting a funding request to senior management, because it can help to demonstrate the need and the return on investment of the outsourcing project, and to secure the budget and the resources. A cost-benefit analysis should also be performed before beginning due diligence on the outsourcing company, because it can help to narrow down the list of potential candidates and to focus on the most relevant and suitable ones. Collecting additional metrics may be a part of the cost-benefit analysis, but it is not the first step, because it requires a clear definition and understanding of the objectives and scope of the outsourcing project.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2021, pages 173-174, 177-178.

= An information security manager should contact the information owner after the incident has been confirmed, as this is the point when the impact and severity of the incident can be assessed and communicated. The information owner is responsible for the business value and use of the information and should be involved in the decision making process regarding the incident response. Contacting the information owner after the incident has been mitigated or contained may be too late, as the information owner may have different priorities or expectations than the security team. Contacting the information owner after the potential incident has been logged may be premature, as the incident may turn out to be a false positive or a minor issue that does not require the information owner’s attention. References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition by Isaca (Author), page 292.

Obtaining senior management buy-in is the best way to enable the assignment of risk and control ownership because it helps to establish the authority and accountability of the risk and control owners, as well as to provide them with the necessary resources and support to perform their roles. Risk and control ownership refers to the assignment of specific responsibilities and accountabilities for managing risks and controls to individuals or groups within the organization. Obtaining senior management buy-in helps to ensure that risk and control ownership is aligned with the organizational objectives, structure, and culture, as well as to communicate the expectations and benefits of risk and control ownership to all stakeholders. Therefore, obtaining senior management buy-in is the correct answer.

Computer forensics (D) best enables an organization to determine what activities occurred and what changes were made to a system during a cybersecurity incident. In CISM incident management, computer forensics focuses on the systematic collection, preservation, analysis, and reconstruction of digital evidence to establish a detailed timeline of events, attacker actions, data access, and system modifications. This capability is essential for understanding the scope and impact of an incident, supporting legal or regulatory requirements, and preventing recurrence.

Continuous log monitoring (B) supports detection and early awareness of suspicious activity, but logs alone may be incomplete, altered, or insufficient to fully reconstruct attacker behavior. Root cause analysis (A) is performed after facts are established and focuses on why an incident occurred, not what exactly happened. Penetration testing (C) is a proactive security testing activity and is unrelated to incident investigation.

CISM emphasizes that once an incident has occurred, forensic analysis is critical to ensure accurate incident handling, evidence integrity, accountability, and informed remediation decisions.

Level of residual risk is the amount of risk that remains after applying risk treatment options, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. The information security manager should compare the level of residual risk with the organization’s risk appetite, which is the amount of risk that the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives. The comparison will help to determine whether the risk treatment options are sufficient, excessive, or inadequate, and whether further actions are needed to align the risk level with the risk appetite.

References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 49: “Residual risk is the risk that remains after risk treatment.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 43: “Risk appetite is the amount of risk, on a broad level, that an entity is willing to accept in pursuit of value.”

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, p. 50: “The information security manager should compare the residual risk with the risk appetite and determine whether the risk treatment options are sufficient, excessive, or inadequate.”

Conducting a business impact analysis (BIA) is the first step when creating an organization’s disaster recovery plan (DRP) because it helps to identify and prioritize the critical business functions or processes that need to be restored after a disruption, and determine their recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs)2. Identifying the response and recovery teams is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves assigning roles and responsibilities for executing the DRP. Reviewing the communications plan is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves defining the communication channels and protocols for notifying and updating the stakeholders during and after a disruption. Developing response and recovery strategies is not the first step, but rather a subsequent step that involves selecting and implementing the appropriate solutions and procedures for restoring the critical business functions or processes. References: 2 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2018/volume-3/business-impact-analysis-bia-and-disaster-recovery-planning-drp

= Annual loss expectancy (ALE) is the most important criterion when deciding whether to accept residual risk, because it represents the expected monetary loss for an asset due to a risk over a one-year period. ALE is calculated by multiplying the annual rate of occurrence (ARO) of a risk event by the single loss expectancy (SLE) of the asset. ARO is the estimated frequency of a risk event occurring within a one-year period, and SLE is the estimated cost of a single occurrence of a risk event. ALE helps to compare the cost and benefit of different risk responses, such as avoidance, mitigation, transfer, or acceptance. Risk acceptance is appropriate when the ALE is lower than the cost of other risk responses, or when the risk is unavoidable or acceptable within the organization’s risk appetite and tolerance. ALE also helps to prioritize the risks that need more attention and resources.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Assessment, page 831; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 22, page 242