CISA Exam Dumps - Certified Information Systems Auditor

The effectiveness of a security awareness training program is best indicated by a reduction in unintentional violations. When employees are well-trained and aware of security practices, they are less likely to inadvertently violate security policies or make mistakes that could lead to breaches. While other factors (such as third-party social engineering tests, employee satisfaction, and completion rates) provide valuable insights, the ultimate goal of security awareness training is to minimize unintentional errors and improve overall security posture12. References: 1(https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2023/volume-2/considerations-for-developing-cybersecurity-awareness-training) 2(https://www.isaca.org/resources/news-and-trends/isaca-now-blog/2023/security-awareness-training-a-critical-success-factor-for-organizations)

The best description of an audit risk is that the financial report may contain undetected material errors. Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate opinion on the financial report when it contains material misstatements or errors. Audit risk consists of three components: inherentrisk, control risk, and detection risk. Inherent risk is the susceptibility of an assertion or a control to a material misstatement or error due to factors such as complexity, volatility, fraud, or human error. Control risk is the risk that a material misstatement or error will not be prevented or detected by the internal controls. Detection risk is the risk that the auditor’s procedures will not detect a material misstatement or error that exists in an assertion or a control. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)

CISA Questions, Answers and Explanations Database

The best indication to an IS auditor that management’s post-implementation review was effective is that lessons learned were documented and applied, as this shows that the management has identified and addressed the issues and gaps that arose during the implementation, and has improved the processes and practices for future projects. Business and IT stakeholders participating in the post-implementation review is a good practice, but it does not guarantee that the review was effective or that the outcomes were implemented. Post-implementation review being a formal phase in the system development life cycle (SDLC) is a requirement, but it does not ensure that the review was effective or that the outcomes were implemented. Internal audit follow-up being completed without any findings is a desirable result, but it does not indicate that the management’s post-implementation review was effectiveorthat the outcomes were implemented. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Information Systems Acquisition, Development andImplementation, Section 3.2: Project Management Practices1

AnIT strategymust bealigned with business objectives, not solely based onmarket trends.

Strategic IT Goals Derived Solely from Market Trends (Correct Answer – D)

IT strategy should supportorganizational goals, not justfollow industry trends.

Example:A company investing inAIjust because it’strendy, without considering business needs.

Previous Year’s IT Goals Not Achieved (Incorrect – A)

A concern, butdoes not indicate a fundamental strategy flaw.

Target Architecture Defined at a Technical Level (Incorrect – B)

Technical details are important for implementation.

Financial Estimates Included (Incorrect – C)

Cost transparency is agood practice.

The main risk associated with adding a new system functionality during the development phase without following a project change management process is that the new functionality may not meet requirements (option B). This is because:

A project change management process is a set of procedures that defines how changes to the project scope, schedule, budget, quality, or resources are requested, evaluated, approved, implemented, and controlled12.

A project change management process helps to ensure that the changes are aligned with the project objectives, stakeholders’ expectations, and business needs12.

Adding a new system functionality during the development phase without following a project change management process can introduce risks such as:

The added functionality has not been documented (option A), which can lead to confusion, inconsistency, errors, and rework3.

The project may fail to meet the established deadline (option C), which can result in delays, penalties, and customer dissatisfaction3.

The project may go over budget (option D), which can cause cost overruns, financial losses, and reduced profitability3.

However, the main risk is that the new functionality may not meet requirements (option B), which can have serious consequences such as:

The new functionality may not be compatible with the existing system or other components3.

The new functionality may not be tested or verified for quality, performance, security, or usability3.

The new functionality may not deliver the expected value or benefits to the users or customers3.

The new functionality may not comply with the regulatory or contractual obligations3.

The new functionality may cause dissatisfaction, complaints, or litigation from the stakeholders3.

Therefore, the main risk associated with adding a new system functionality during the development phase without following a project change management process is that the new functionality may not meet requirements (option B), as this can jeopardize the success and acceptance of the project.

 A differential backup scheme is the best option when storage media is limited, as it only backs up the data that has changed since the last full backup. This reduces the amount of storage space required and also simplifies the restoration process, as only the last full backup and the last differential backup are needed. A real-time backup scheme would require continuous replication of data, which would consume a lot of storage space and network bandwidth. A virtual backup scheme would create a snapshot of the data at a point in time, but it would not reduce the storage space required, as it would still need to store the changes made to the data. A full backup scheme would back up all the data every time, which would require the most storage space and also take longer to complete. References: ISACA, CISA Review Manual, 27th Edition, 2018, page 405

Segregation of duties (SOD) is a core internal control and an essential component of an effective risk management strategy. SOD emphasizes sharing the responsibilities of key business processesby distributing the discrete functions of these processes to multiple people and departments, helping to reduce the risk of possible errors and fraud1.

SOD is especially important in IT security, where granting excessive system access to one person or group can lead to harmful consequences, such as data breaches, identity theft, or bypassing security controls2. SOD breaks IT-related tasks into four separate function categories: authorization, custody, recordkeeping, and reconciliation1. Ideally, no one person or department holds responsibility in multiple categories.

In a role-based environment, where access privileges are granted based on predefined roles, it is important to ensure that the roles are designed and assigned in a way that supports SOD. For example, the person who develops an application should not also be the one who tests it, deploys it, or maintains it.

Therefore, an application developer should not be assigned the roles of IT operator, system administration, or database administration, as these roles may conflict with their development role and create opportunities for misuse or abuse of the system. The only role that may be assigned to an application developer without violating SOD is emergency support, which is a temporary role that allows the developer to access the system in case of a critical issue that requires immediate resolution3. However, even this role should be granted with caution and monitored closely to ensure compliance with SOD policies.