CISA Exam Dumps - Certified Information Systems Auditor

 The best way to help management understand the associated risk of missing backup cycles due to operator error and lack of exception management is to explain the impact to disaster recovery. Disaster recovery is the process of restoring normal operations and functions after a disruptive event, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a hardware failure. Backup cycles are essential for disaster recovery, because they ensure that the organization has copies of its critical data and systems that can be restored in case of data loss or corruption. If backup cycles are missed due to operator error, and these exceptions are not managed, the organization may not have the latest or complete backups available for disaster recovery, which can result in prolonged downtime, reduced productivity, lost revenue, reputational damage, and legal or regulatory penalties. The other options are not as effective as explaining the impact to disaster recovery, because they either do not address the risk of data loss or corruption, or they focus on operational or technical aspects rather than business outcomes. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1

The best way to ensure data integrity across system interfaces is to perform reconciliation. Reconciliation is the process of comparing and verifying the data from different sources or systems to ensure that they are consistent, accurate, and complete. Reconciliation can help to identify and resolve any discrepancies, errors, or anomalies in the data that could affect the quality, reliability, or validity of the information. Reconciliation can also help to detect and prevent any unauthorized or fraudulent data manipulation or modification. References:

CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)

CISA Questions, Answers and Explanations Database

The best evidence that an organization’s IT strategy is aligned to its business objectives is that the IT strategy is approved by executive management. This implies that the IT strategy has been reviewed and validated by the senior leaders of the organization, who are responsible for setting and overseeing the business objectives. The IT strategy may be modified inresponse to organizational change, based on IT operational best practices, or have significant impact on the business strategy, but these are not sufficient indicators of alignment without executive approval. References: CISA Review Manual (Digital Version)1, Chapter 1, Section 1.2.1

The best answer is B. End users are able to create their own cloud server instances.

The biggest concern is uncontrolled provisioning, because allowing end users to create their own server instances can bypass governance, security baselines, cost controls, asset management, and monitoring. ISACA’s cloud and auditable security guidance emphasizes the importance of strong governance, control over misconfigurations, and consistent security baselines in cloud environments. Unrestricted self-provisioning significantly increases the risk of shadow IT and insecure deployments.

Option A is usually a normal protective arrangement. Option C can be appropriate depending on design and identity strategy. Option D is a governance weakness, but it is less immediate than uncontrolled creation of cloud infrastructure by end users. In audit terms, uncontrolled server creation directly threatens configuration, access control, and accountability.

References (Official ISACA):

ISACA, Best Practices for Auditable Security Controls

ISACA, The Role of Digital Transformation Audits

The correct answer is D. Establish a global IT risk scoring criteria.

When business units use different risk methods, their risk scores are not comparable. One unit’s “high” risk may not mean the same thing as another unit’s “high” risk. The organization first needs a common risk scoring method so IT risks can be measured, compared, aggregated, and reported consistently across the enterprise.

Option A is not the best first approach because a weighted score is only useful after the organization has consistent scoring criteria. Option B is not appropriate because choosing the highest-rated risk may overstate overall risk appetite and may be based on inconsistent rating methods. Option C is also inappropriate because averaging inconsistent risk scores can produce misleading results.

ISACA’s glossary defines risk appetite as the amount of risk an entity is prepared to accept when pursuing its objectives. ISACA also discusses risk appetite in terms of identifying risk the organization is or is not willing to accept in relation to its values, digital strategy, stakeholder impact, and required actions.

This maps to Governance and Management of IT because risk appetite, IT risk management, risk reporting, and governance decision-making are Domain 2 topics in the CISA Exam Content Outline.

An insider attack poses the greatest risk to an organization’s most sensitive data. An insider attack is a type of cyberattack that is carried out by someone who has legitimate access to the organization’s network, systems, or data, such as an employee, contractor, or business partner. An insider attack can be intentional or unintentional, malicious or negligent, and can have various motives, such as financial gain, revenge, espionage, sabotage, or curiosity.

An insider attack poses the greatest risk to an organization’s most sensitive data because:

An insider has a high level of trust and privilege within the organization, which allows them to bypass security controls and access confidential or restricted data without raising suspicion or detection.

An insider has a deep knowledge of the organization’s operations, processes, policies, and vulnerabilities, which enables them to exploit them effectively and cause maximum damage or disruption.

An insider can use various techniques and tools to conceal their identity and actions, such as encryption, steganography, deletion, or alteration of logs or evidence.

An insider can cause significant harm or loss to the organization in terms of data integrity, availability, confidentiality, reputation, compliance, and profitability.

According to the 2023 Cost of Insider Threats Global Report by Ponemon Institute and ObserveIT 1, the average annual cost of insider threats for organizations worldwide was $11.45 million in 2022, a 31% increase from 2018. The report also found that the average number of incidents per organization was 77 in 2022, a 47% increase from 2018. The report classified insider threats into three categories: careless or negligent employees or contractors, criminal or malicious insiders, and credential thieves. The report revealed that careless or negligent insiders were the most common and costly type of insider threat, accounting for 62% of all incidents and $4.58 million in costs.

The other options are not the greatest risk to an organization’s most sensitive data, although they can still pose significant threats.

A password attack is a type of cyberattack that attempts to guess or crack a user’s password to gain unauthorized access to their account or system. A password attack can use various methods, such as brute force, dictionary, rainbow table, phishing, keylogging, or social engineering. A password attack can compromise the security and privacy of the user’s data and information. However, a password attack can be prevented or mitigated by using strong and unique passwords, changing passwords frequently, enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), and avoiding clicking on suspicious links or attachments.

An eavesdropping attack is a type of cyberattack that intercepts or monitors the communication between two parties without their knowledge or consent. An eavesdropping attack can use various techniques, such as wiretapping, packet sniffing, man-in-the-middle (MITM), or side-channel. An eavesdropping attack can expose the content and metadata of the communication, such as messages, files, voice calls, emails, etc. However, an eavesdropping attack can be prevented or mitigated by using encryption, authentication, digital signatures, VPNs (virtual private networks), or secure protocols.

A spear phishing attack is a type of phishing attack that targets a specific individual or group with personalized and convincing emails that appear to come from a trusted source. A spear phishing attack aims to trick the recipient into clicking on a malicious link or attachment that can infect their device with malware or steal their credentials or data. A spear phishing attack can compromise the security and privacy of the recipient’s data and information. However, a spear phishing attack can be prevented or mitigated by verifying the sender’s identity and email address, checking the email content for spelling and grammar errors, hovering over links before clicking on them (or not clicking at all), scanning attachments for viruses before opening them (or not opening at all), and reporting suspicious emails to IT security staff.

Spreadsheets, often used in EUC, are prone to manual input errors and formula mistakes. These errors can significantly compromise the accuracy and integrity of financial reporting.

References

ISACA CISA Review Manual (Current Edition) - Chapter on End-User Computing (EUC) risks

Industry Research on Spreadsheet Errors: Multiple studies highlight the prevalence of errors in spreadsheets, especially those used for financial purposes.