CGEIT Exam Dumps - Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

Meeting with stakeholders to explain the strategy and incorporate feedback is the best way for a CIO to secure support for a strategy to achieve long-term IT objectives, because it ensures that the strategy is aligned with the needs, expectations, and interests of the stakeholders, and that the stakeholders are engaged, informed, and committed to the strategy. By meeting with stakeholders, the CIO can communicate the vision, goals, and benefits of the strategy, andaddress any questions, concerns, or objections that the stakeholders may have. By incorporating feedback, the CIO can demonstrate respect and appreciation for the stakeholder input, and make any necessary adjustments or improvements to the strategy based on the stakeholder perspectives. Meeting with stakeholders and incorporating feedback can also foster trust, collaboration, and innovation between the CIO and the stakeholders, and enhance the value proposition and performance of the strategy.

The other options are not as effective as meeting with stakeholders and incorporating feedback, because they are either too autocratic, too vague, or too passive to secure support for a strategy to achieve long-term IT objectives. Making the necessary strategic decisions and notifying staff accordingly is a top-down approach that may alienate or antagonize the stakeholders, and create resistance or conflict. Developing tactics to implement the strategy and share with stakeholders is a tactical approach that may not address the strategic alignment, integration, or evaluation of the strategy. Developing a communication plan for distribution of information to staff is a one-way approach that may not elicit stakeholder feedback, engagement, or commitment. According to Stakeholder management: Your plan for influencing project outcomes, “Stakeholder management is essentially stakeholder relationship management as it is the relationship and not the actual stakeholder groups that are managed.”

According to the web search results, one of the most important aspects of risk management is the timely and accurate reporting of risk events, which are incidents or occurrences that have a negative impact on the objectives, operations, or reputation of an organization1. A framework to ensure effective reporting of risk events can help to identify, analyze, communicate, and respond to risks in a systematic and consistent manner2. Without such a framework, the organization may fail to capture, escalate, and learn from risk events, and may expose itself to greater losses,liabilities, and regulatory sanctions3. Therefore, the lack of a framework to ensure effective reporting of risk events would be of most concern regarding the effectiveness of risk management processes.

The other options are less concerning than option D, although they may also indicate some weaknesses in the risk management processes. Key risk indicators (KRIs) are metrics that measure the likelihood or impact of potential or actual risks4. While they are useful for monitoring and managing risks, they are not essential for the effectiveness of risk management processes. Risk management requirements are criteria or standards that define the expectations and responsibilities for managing risks. Including them in performance reviews can help to align the incentives and behaviors of employees with the risk appetite and strategy of the organization. However, they are not the only way to ensure accountability and compliance with risk management processes. The plans and procedures are documents that describe the objectives, scope, roles, activities, and outputs of risk management processes. Updating them on an annual basis can help to reflect the changes in the internal and external environment that affect the risks faced by the organization. However, they are not the only source of guidance and information for risk management processes.

References :=

Risk Event - Definition from KWHS

Risk Management - Overview, Importance and Processes

Transforming risk efficiency and effectiveness | McKinsey

Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) - Definition from KWHS

[Risk Management Requirements - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

[Risk Management Requirements - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

[Risk Management Plan - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

[Risk Management Plan - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics]

Prior to setting IT objectives, an enterprise must have established its strategies. Strategies are the high-level plans that define the direction and goals of the enterprise and how it will achieve them. Strategies provide the context and guidance for setting IT objectives, which are the specific and measurable outcomes that IT will deliver to support the strategies. IT objectives should be aligned with and derived from the enterprise strategies, as well as the enterprise vision, mission, and values

 A new privacy regulation is a legal requirement that aims to protect the rights and interests of customers in relation to their personal data, especially in the event of a breach involvingpersonally identifiable information (PII). A breach is an unauthorized or unlawful access, disclosure, alteration, or destruction of personal data that may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data1. A new privacy regulation may introduce new risk for an enterprise that collects, processes, stores, or transfers personal data of customers, such as legal, financial, reputational, or operational risk. Therefore, the IT risk management team’s first course of action should be to determine if the new regulation introduces new risk for the enterprise, by assessing the scope, applicability, and impact of the regulation on the enterprise’s data activities and practices. This can help the IT risk management team to identify and prioritize the gaps or issues that need to be addressed to comply with the regulation and to mitigate the potential risk23. References: What is a Data Breach? Definition & Examples. How to Manage Data Privacy Risks. Data Privacy Risk Management: A Guide for Businesses.

 Goals-based performance appraisals are a method of evaluating employees based on their achievement of specific and measurable objectives that are aligned with the organization’s strategy and vision. Goals-based performance appraisals can help to identify the most capable staff who have contributed to the organization’s success, demonstrated high performance and potential, and shown commitment and engagement. Reviewing current goals-based performance appraisals across the enterprise can help management to retain the most capable staff regardless of their location, compensation, or length of service12. References: Performance Appraisal Methods: Traditional and Modern Methods (with example). How to Conduct a Performance Appraisal.

 Communicating the program to stakeholders to gain consensus is the first step after developing the scope of the IT governance program, as it helps to ensure that the program is aligned with the enterprise goals and objectives, and that it has the support and commitment of the key parties who have an interest or influence in the IT governance. Communication also helps to overcome resistance, address concerns, and foster collaboration among the stakeholders12. References := CGEIT Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Subtopic A: Governance Framework, Task 3: Ensure that stakeholder needs, conditions and options are evaluated to determine balanced, agreed-on enterprise objectives to be achieved; setting direction through prioritization and decision making; and monitoring performance and compliance against agreed-on direction and objectives.

 An architecture exception process is a mechanism to handle requests for deviations from the established IT architecture policies or standards. It allows the enterprise to evaluate the business case, risks, benefits, and alternatives of implementing a system that uses a technology that is not in line with its IT strategy. It also enables the enterprise to define the conditions, limitations, and timelines for granting or denying the exception. According to one of the web search results1, “requests for exceptions to any architectural policy or standard use this process” and “the decision may include a deadline for removing the need for the exception, constraints on future projects, or similar terms.” Addressing the situation as part of an architecture exception process is the best way to manage it within an IT governance framework, as it provides a structured andtransparent way to balance the business needs and the IT alignment. Updating the IT strategy to align with the new technology, initiating an operational change request, or rejecting based on non-alignment are not the best ways to manage the situation within an IT governance framework. They are more likely to be either too rigid or too reactive, and may not consider the trade-offs or implications of the decision..

 References:

CGEIT Review Manual 2021, Chapter 1: Governance of Enterprise IT, Section 1.4: Value Delivery, page 231

CGEIT Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2021, Question 9, page 82

A Matrixed Approach to Designing IT Governance - MIT Sloan Management Review3

Enterprise Architecture Governance | The Definitive Guide - LeanIX4

Architecture Review Board Exception Process - Minnesota’s State Portal5

 Defining a strategy for IT measurement is the best way to determine whether the KPIs adequately support organizational objectives, as it would help to establish a clear vision, scope, purpose, and alignment of the IT measurement activities. A strategy for IT measurement would also help to identify the relevant stakeholders, roles, responsibilities, and expectations for the IT measurement process, and to define the criteria, methods, and tools for selecting, collecting, analyzing, and reporting the KPIs. The other options are not as effective, as they do not address the root cause of the board’s question, which is the lack of a coherent and consistent approach to IT measurement. References: : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.1: Performance Measurement and Reporting Overview, Page 112 : CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3: Benefits Realization, Section 3.3: Performance Measurement and Reporting, Subsection 3.3.2: Performance Measurement and Reporting Process, Page 113 : The Value of IT Governance