Workday-Pro-HCM-Core Exam Dumps - Workday Pro HCM Core Certification Exam

In Workday, custom validations are evaluated based on business process context, including the event type that triggered the process. The Request One-Time Payment and Request One-Time Payment for Self are separate event types, even though they share similar functionality.

To prevent existing validations from running for employee self-service requests, administrators must explicitly exclude the self-service event type within the validation logic. This is done using the Maintain Custom Validations task, where conditions can be added to evaluate the One-Time Payment Event for Self field.

Security changes are not appropriate because the requirement is to allow the process but exclude validations. Optional field configuration does not control validation execution. Creating additional validations does not stop existing ones from firing.

By excluding the One-Time Payment Event for Self event type within the validation, Workday ensures validations continue to apply to administrator-initiated requests but not to employee self-service requests.

Therefore, option C is the correct and Workday-supported solution.

The correct answers are B, D, and E.

User-based security groups are groups in which membership is manually assigned to individual users. They are highly flexible and used primarily for administrative or elevated-access purposes.

(B) These groups can be either constrained or unconstrained. Constrained groups limit data access (for example, access only to workers in a particular supervisory org), while unconstrained groups provide broad system-wide visibility.

(D) These groups are commonly used for system administrators, payroll admins, or HR system owners, who require full access across tenants.

(E) Once a user is assigned to a user-based group, they automatically inherit access to all domains and business processes that the security group has permissions for.

Option A is incorrect because user-based groups are not always unconstrained; and C is incorrect because assigning users does not initiate a business process—it’s a configuration action managed through the Maintain Security Group Members task.

In Workday, the Review Step within a business process is specifically designed to enable a user to review, edit, and approve information that was submitted by the initiator. This step allows designated participants to view the transaction details, make permissible edits, and approve or send it back for correction. It serves as an intermediate checkpoint before final approval or completion, ensuring data accuracy and compliance with policy.

By contrast, the Approval Step (Option C) only permits approval or denial — it does not allow data modification. The Consolidated Approval Step (Option B) groups multiple approval steps for simplification but also lacks edit functionality. The Integration Step (Option D) is used for system integrations and automated data transfers, not for user data review.

Thus, the Review Step uniquely provides both review and edit capabilities, which makes it ideal for validating and refining information early in the process lifecycle.

Reference (Paraphrased Source):

Workday Pro HCM Core – Business Process Configuration Guide (2023R2) – Section: “Step Types and Participant Actions” and “Review Step Configuration.”

In Workday, the Effective Date controls when the compensation change is legally and payroll-effective, while the Employee Visibility Date determines when employees can see the change in Workday.

In this scenario:

The increase must be effective March 1 for equity and payroll accuracy.

Employees should not see the change until after March 20, when managers communicate it.

By setting:

Effective Date = March 1

Employee Visibility Date = March 21

Workday ensures the increase is included in payroll and historical records while remaining hidden from employees until the specified visibility date.

Using the transaction date or delaying the effective date would create payroll inaccuracies. Setting both dates to March 21 would make the increase effective too late.

Therefore, option D is the correct and compliant solution.

Workday provides the Rollout Compensation Plans to Employees task to efficiently assign newly created compensation plans to employees who meet defined eligibility criteria. This task evaluates the eligibility rule attached to the plan and assigns the plan to all qualifying employees in bulk.

Manual approaches such as Request Compensation Change or Change Job events are inefficient and not scalable. The View Compensation Plan Rollout Process task is informational and does not perform assignments.

Using the rollout task ensures consistency, reduces administrative effort, and aligns with Workday best practices for plan deployment.

Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

In Workday HCM, access to direct reports’ data is primarily driven by managerial relationships within the supervisory organization hierarchy. The Maintain Assignable Roles task is used to define how role-based security groups can be assigned and how access is derived from organizational relationships.

The setting that grants managers access to their direct reports’ data is Is Leader. When a role-based security group is configured with the Is Leader designation, Workday evaluates the worker’s role as a manager (leader) of a supervisory organization. This enables leader-based security access, allowing managers to view and act on data for workers who report directly to them (and, depending on configuration, potentially their subordinates).

This setting is foundational for manager self-service and manager insights, such as viewing team profiles, compensation, performance data, and other worker-related information tied to reporting relationships. Without the Is Leader setting, Workday would not recognize the user as having leader-based authority over the workers in the supervisory organization.

The other options do not provide this access. Enabled for Location Hierarchy grants access based on location structure, not reporting relationships. Is Supporting is used for roles like HR Partners or Finance Partners who support an organization but are not managers. Enabled for Supervisory Organization controls where a role can be assigned, not whether it confers manager-level access.

From a Workday Pro HCM best-practice perspective, Is Leader is the critical configuration that ensures managers can view and manage their direct reports’ data appropriately. Therefore, the correct and Workday-verified answer is Is Leader.

In Workday HCM, compensation elements serve as the critical link between compensation plans in HCM and earnings codes in Payroll. Their primary purpose is to ensure that compensation entered in Workday is correctly interpreted, calculated, and paid through payroll processing. Without compensation elements, payroll systems would not be able to distinguish how different types of compensation—such as base salary, allowances, or bonuses—should be treated for taxation, deductions, and reporting.

Compensation elements are applied to three key components within the compensation framework: plans, grades, and grade profiles. When assigned to compensation plans, elements define how the plan’s compensation is paid. When applied to grades and grade profiles, they support consistency and scalability by ensuring that compensation tied to a specific grade structure flows correctly to payroll, regardless of the job or position.

Compensation elements are not applied to eligibility rules, benefit deductions, or compensation packages. Eligibility rules determine who can receive compensation, not how it is paid. Benefit deductions are managed within benefits configuration, and packages are used primarily for grouping plans, not payroll integration.

By standardizing the payroll linkage across plans, grades, and grade profiles, compensation elements provide flexibility, global consistency, and accurate payroll results. This makes option C the correct answer according to Workday Pro HCM compensation and payroll integration best practices.

When a Change Job event includes a compensation impact, Workday triggers the Propose Compensation Change subprocess. This subprocess allows users to review and update compensation plans, amounts, and guidelines as part of the job change.

Request Compensation Change is a standalone process used when compensation changes occur without a job change. Propose Compensation Offer and Propose Compensation Hire are tied to recruiting and hiring events, not internal transfers.

The Propose Compensation Change process ensures that compensation updates are evaluated with proper eligibility rules, guidelines, approvals, and audit tracking within the context of the job change.

Therefore, option D is the correct answer.