Workday-Pro-HCM-Core Exam Dumps - Workday Pro HCM Core Certification Exam

The Employee Compensation Audit report in Workday is designed to identify discrepancies between eligibility and actual plan assignment. It compares whether employees should be assigned to compensation plans based on eligibility rules versus whether they are currently assigned.

In this scenario, the Sales Analyst job profile was newly added to the Sales job family. As a result, Sales Analysts now meet the eligibility criteria for the Sales allowance plan. However, unless a compensation event (such as Hire, Job Change, or Compensation Change) has occurred, the allowance plan may not yet be assigned.

When an employee is eligible for a plan but not currently assigned, Workday flags this discrepancy under Unassigned Eligible Compensation Components. This column highlights compensation plans that should be assigned based on current eligibility but are missing.

Assigned Ineligible Compensation Components would only apply if the employee had the plan but no longer qualified. The plan will appear on the report because eligibility exists.

Therefore, the correct column is Unassigned Eligible Compensation Components, making option A correct.

In Workday, position management and job management represent two different staffing models. In a position management organization, a worker is assigned to a specific position (a distinct headcount-controlled object with attributes like availability date, restrictions, and position details). When you initiate a job change that transfers the worker into a job management organization, the worker is no longer staffed against a position-managed role. Instead, the worker becomes staffed in a job management context, where staffing is generally based on the job/role and organization headcount rules rather than a discrete position object.

Because the worker is leaving a position-managed assignment, Workday treats the original position as vacated. The position itself typically remains in the position management organization (it does not “move” into job management), and it does not automatically cease to exist simply because the incumbent moved. As a result, the most accurate description is that the prior position becomes open and may be available for backfill, depending on how your tenant is configured (for example, whether the position is frozen, closed, or otherwise restricted by staffing rules or business process conditions). This aligns with Workday’s standard behavior: a worker transfer out of a filled position leaves an open position that can be recruited for and filled through normal staffing activities.

To meet seasonal demand, you need to hire cashiers, retail specialists, and customer service representatives.

What hiring restriction do you set to meet this need?

A. Job Family Group

B. Job Profile

C. Job Description

D. Job Category

Answer: A

In Workday HCM, hiring restrictions are used in job management organizations to control what types of jobs can be hired into a supervisory organization. Selecting the correct level of restriction is critical to balancing flexibility with governance. In this scenario, the organization needs to hire multiple distinct roles—cashiers, retail specialists, and customer service representatives—to address seasonal demand. These roles are different job profiles, but they typically belong to the same broader functional area within the organization.

The most appropriate hiring restriction to meet this requirement is the Job Family Group. A job family group allows organizations to group related job families under a common functional umbrella, such as Retail Operations or Customer Support. By setting the hiring restriction at the job family group level, the organization can hire multiple job profiles that fall within that group without needing to define each job profile individually. This provides flexibility, speeds up hiring during peak seasonal periods, and reduces administrative effort.

Restricting hiring by Job Profile would be too limiting because it allows only a single, specific role to be hired, which does not meet the need for multiple types of workers. Job Description is not used as a hiring restriction object in Workday staffing models, and Job Category is primarily used for reporting and classification purposes rather than controlling staffing eligibility.

Therefore, using a Job Family Group hiring restriction aligns with Workday Pro HCM best practices by enabling efficient, scalable hiring across multiple related roles while maintaining appropriate organizational control.

In Workday, the ability to assign compensation plans—regardless of employee eligibility—is controlled by security domains, not by business process steps or guidelines. The Worker Data: Compensation Plan Type security domain governs access to specific types of compensation plans, such as allowance plans, salary plans, or one-time payments.

When a user (such as a compensation partner) has broader access through this domain, they can assign compensation plans even when eligibility rules are not met. This is commonly granted to advanced compensation roles to allow exceptions, corrections, or special cases during approvals.

Manager roles are typically restricted by eligibility, which is why the manager can only assign the car allowance. The compensation partner’s elevated security allows them to override eligibility.

The “Select Any Compensation Package” option controls package selection, not plan-level overrides. Guidelines and manager domains do not grant override capability.

Therefore, the correct security domain is Worker Data: Compensation Plan Type, making option D correct.

In Workday HCM, it is common to configure organization-specific business process definitions, especially for high-impact processes such as Termination, where approval steps and routing may vary by supervisory organization. When multiple definitions exist for the same business process, administrators need a reliable way to determine which definition applies to which supervisory organization.

The correct report for this purpose is Business Process Configuration Options. This Workday-delivered report provides a consolidated view of all business process definitions for a given business process and clearly shows the organization-specific assignments. It displays which definition is active, the organizations it applies to, and the precedence rules used by Workday when evaluating which definition to apply during a transaction.

Workday evaluates business process definitions in a hierarchical order, typically starting with the most specific organization and moving up the supervisory hierarchy. The Business Process Configuration Options report allows administrators to validate this configuration and ensure the correct definition is being triggered for each supervisory organization.

The other options do not meet this requirement. View Business Process Template shows the delivered template structure but does not reflect tenant-specific configuration or organizational applicability. Business Object Details provides metadata about business objects but does not indicate applied business process definitions. Business Process Definitions for Business Object lists definitions associated with a business object but does not clearly map them to specific supervisory organizations.

From a Workday Pro HCM best-practice standpoint, Business Process Configuration Options is the authoritative report for auditing and troubleshooting organization-specific business process behavior. It ensures transparency, supports compliance, and helps administrators maintain accurate and predictable process execution.

Therefore, the correct and Workday-verified answer is Business Process Configuration Options.

In Workday HCM, allowance plan profiles are used to localize compensation amounts for specific employee populations based on eligibility criteria such as location. When an employee meets the eligibility for a plan profile, Workday defaults the amount defined in that profile.

However, when an employee does not meet the eligibility criteria for any existing plan profiles, Workday defaults to the base default value defined on the allowance plan itself. In this scenario, the default value is $100 USD, and the available profiles only apply to employees in Toronto, Paris, and Sydney.

Since the employee is being hired in Dublin, Ireland, they do not qualify for any of the defined profiles. As a result, Workday applies the plan’s default value rather than a profile-specific amount.

Workday does not automatically convert currencies or default to zero unless explicitly configured to do so. Therefore, the default amount remains $100 USD.

Options A and C incorrectly assume that Workday defaults to zero, which is not standard behavior. Option D applies only to Paris employees.

Thus, the correct answer is $100 USD, making option B correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (Paraphrased from Workday Pro HCM Core – Organizations Configuration and Setup Guide, 2023R2):

The values available in the Subtype field when creating a new Cost Center are determined by the subtypes configured for that specific organization type. Each organization type (e.g., Company, Cost Center, Region, or Supervisory) can have one or more associated subtypes that define additional categorization or behavior.

During configuration, administrators define which subtypes are valid for each organization type. Hence, when an end user creates a Cost Center, only the subtypes associated with the “Cost Center” organization type will appear in the selection list.

Options A, C, and D are incorrect because subtypes are not influenced by location, user role, or system recommendations — they are strictly defined in the configuration setup.

Reference (Paraphrased Source):

Workday Pro HCM Core – Organizations Configuration Guide (2023R2), Section: “Defining Organization Types and Subtypes.”

In Workday HCM, role-based (constrained) security groups control access to business processes and data based on an individual’s organizational assignments. The Access Rights to Organizations setting determines which organizations—and therefore which workers—fall within the scope of responsibility for users assigned to that security role.

When the Access Rights to Organizations setting is configured as Current Organization and All Subordinates, the HR Partner assigned to a supervisory organization gains security access to that organization and every subordinate organization beneath it in the hierarchy. This access applies regardless of whether subordinate organizations have their own HR Partners assigned.

In the context of employee terminations, this means HR Partners are responsible for approving termination events for employees who belong to the organization they directly support as well as employees in any subordinate supervisory organizations. Workday evaluates the worker’s organizational membership at the time of the transaction and routes the business process approval accordingly.

Options B and C are incorrect because Workday does not limit approvals based on whether subordinate organizations have HR Partners or restrict access to a single subordinate. Option D is also incorrect because it ignores subordinate organizations entirely, which contradicts the selected access rights configuration.

From a Workday Pro HCM security design perspective, this setting ensures appropriate oversight and continuity by allowing HR Partners to support broader organizational segments without creating security gaps. It is commonly used in shared-services or regional HR models where HR Partners support entire organizational branches.

Therefore, the correct and Workday-verified answer is that HR Partners must approve termination events for employees in their assigned organization and all subordinate organizations.

The Employee Compensation Audit report is specifically designed to identify mismatches between compensation plan eligibility and actual plan assignment. It highlights situations where employees are assigned compensation plans they should not have, as well as cases where employees are eligible but not assigned.

In this scenario, the goal is to identify employees who are assigned to bonus plans despite not meeting eligibility rules. The Employee Compensation Audit report includes a dedicated section for Assigned Ineligible Compensation Components, making it the most accurate and efficient reporting tool for this requirement.

Other reports do not serve this purpose:

The Compensation Plan Rollout Process is transactional and informational only.

Employees Assigned Multiple Bonus Plans focuses on duplication, not eligibility.

Compensation Spreadsheets are manual and lack eligibility validation logic.

Therefore, the correct report is Employee Compensation Audit, making option D correct.