Slack-Con-201 Exam Dumps - Salesforce Certified Slack Consultant

The correct recommendation is to collaborate with guests through Slack Connect channels . In an Enterprise Grid migration, guest access must be reviewed carefully because external collaboration should be governed, secure, and intentionally scoped. Slack Connect is the better long-term model for working with external parties because it allows separate organizations to collaborate in shared channels while each organization retains control over its own users, authentication, lifecycle management, and security policies. Option A is dangerous because converting guests to full members gives external users internal membership privileges and can create unnecessary security exposure. Option B addresses authentication behavior but does not solve the access model. Option C preserves a guest construct, but it does not provide the same clean enterprise collaboration model that Slack Connect is designed to support. The question specifically asks how to manage guest users post-migration while retaining collaboration access; Slack Connect preserves the collaboration need without turning external people into internal members.

Reference topic: Delivery and Migration — Enterprise Grid migration, external collaboration model, guest-user planning, Slack Connect transition, and post-migration access design.

==========

The correct answer is A. Approval policies for apps and external collaboration are governance and policy decisions, so the right stakeholders are the people responsible for Slack policies and settings. This may include Org Owners, Org Admins, security, compliance, legal, IT, or collaboration platform owners depending on the client’s operating model. Option B is too narrow because the head of IT may not own Slack-specific policy decisions, especially in a mature Slack environment where security, compliance, or collaboration governance may share responsibility. Option C is misaligned because communication and learning stakeholders are important for rollout messaging and enablement, not app approval or Slack Connect policy decisions. Option D is also insufficient because superusers understand usage patterns but usually do not own enterprise policy decisions. The consultant should identify decision-makers by responsibility, not title alone. Asking who owns policies and settings ensures the correct people attend the discussion and prevents policy decisions from being made by stakeholders without proper authority.

The correct answer is B . The client’s Slack admin is responsible for implementing configurations in the client’s Slack instance. A consultant may advise, document decisions, facilitate workshops, validate best practices, and guide the client through configuration choices, but the actual implementation authority belongs to the client-side administrator or owner with the required permissions. Option A is wrong because the Slack account executive owns commercial and account relationship responsibilities, not hands-on instance configuration. Option C is wrong because the customer success manager supports adoption and long-term success but does not directly configure the customer’s Slack environment as the default owner. Option D is also incorrect because the executive sponsor provides business direction, removes blockers, and approves major decisions, but does not normally implement technical settings. This question tests role clarity. In a Slack engagement, configuration ownership must be explicit so policies and settings decisions are correctly translated into the live environment by the authorized client administrator.

==========

The correct answer is A . The discovery finding tells you that Slack maturity is uneven across the organization. The IT department already uses Slack, so those users may understand channels, threads, reactions, search, notifications, apps, and basic etiquette. The rest of the organization, however, will be new to Slack and will require more foundational onboarding, communication guidance, and enablement. This affects deliverables because training, support resources, communications, channel strategy, and launch messaging must account for two populations: existing users and new users. Option B is unsupported because the scenario mentions IT only, not a marketing-specific support need. Option C is incorrect because org-wide channels can still be adopted; they may actually become important for launch communications. Option D is too rigid. Separate governance sessions are not required solely because maturity levels differ. The right consultant behavior is to tailor deliverables so experienced Slack users are not slowed down by overly basic material while new users are not overwhelmed by advanced assumptions.

==========

The correct answer is D . An Enterprise Grid organization can have only one Org Primary Owner . This is the highest-level ownership role for the Enterprise organization and is distinct from Org Owners, Org Admins, Workspace Owners, and Workspace Admins. The number of workspaces in the grid does not change the number of Org Primary Owners. In this scenario, the organization has four workspaces — Social, Finance, Marketing, and Operations — but that does not mean there are four Org Primary Owners. Option A incorrectly maps one Org Primary Owner per workspace. Option B has no basis in the role model. Option C is wrong because the organization cannot define an arbitrary number of Org Primary Owners. The Primary Owner concept exists to provide a single ultimate accountable owner for the Enterprise organization, while additional administrative responsibility can be delegated through Org Owner, Org Admin, Workspace Owner, and Workspace Admin roles.

Reference topic: Governance Structure (Owner and Admin Roles) — Org Primary Owner, Enterprise Grid role hierarchy, ownership accountability, and admin delegation.

==========