Slack-Con-201 Exam Dumps - Salesforce Certified Slack Consultant

The correct answer is D . In an Enterprise Grid launch, admin-related governance should be handled at the organization level wherever possible, not separately across individual workspace settings. Creating a user group for all admins through org policies and the permissions tab gives the organization a centralized, repeatable way to manage an admin audience. This supports launch readiness because admins can be addressed consistently in announcements, enablement, support workflows, and governance communications. Option A is too workspace-local and does not scale cleanly across Enterprise Grid. Option B repeats the workspace-level mistake and also mixes admins and owners without matching the stated requirement. Option C incorrectly creates a user group for owners rather than admins. Option D matches the requirement and the Enterprise Grid operating model: use org-level policy configuration to create the intended admin user group. The key principle is centralized governance for enterprise-wide admin structures.

Reference topic: Policies and Settings — org policies, permissions, admin user groups, Enterprise Grid launch configuration, and centralized governance.

==========

The correct answer is D . A Slack migration invitation requires authority from both the Enterprise Grid side and the migrating workspace side. The Enterprise organization must be represented by an authorized org-level owner, and the migrating workspace must be represented by the Workspace Primary Owner because that person has ultimate ownership authority over the workspace being moved. Option A is too broad because not all Workspace Owners can accept a migration invitation; the migrating workspace’s Primary Owner is the critical workspace-side authority. Option B incorrectly includes Org Admin but omits the migrating Workspace Primary Owner. Option C is also incomplete because it does not include the migrating Workspace Primary Owner and overstates the role of Org Admins. Option D correctly reflects the required decision authority: the Enterprise-side owner role and the primary owner of the migrating workspace must be involved. This protects migration governance by ensuring that a workspace cannot be absorbed into Enterprise Grid without the correct ownership-level approval.

The best answer is B because it captures both major discovery themes: stronger external partnerships and stronger internal culture through cross-functional collaboration. A good Slack vision statement should be concise, outcome-oriented, and aligned to the client’s stated business goals. “Build deeper connections” maps directly to the client’s desire to improve employee culture and external partnership strength, while “single global collaboration platform” aligns to the Enterprise Grid purchase and cross-functional operating model. Option A is generic vendor-language and does not reflect the client’s specific goals. Option C focuses heavily on external communication security and business scale, but it misses the employee culture and cross-functional collaboration requirement. Option D introduces an unsupported metric, “expedite sales cycle time by 50%,” which was not stated in discovery; a consultant should not invent quantified outcomes unless the client has validated them. The correct vision statement must synthesize discovery inputs without overreaching.

Reference topic: Discovery — vision statement development, business-outcome alignment, external collaboration goals, culture goals, and Enterprise Grid value framing.

==========

The correct answer is A. Hidden . The scenario is explicit: the merger and acquisition project is confidential, and the project team must work together in a non-public way. A hidden workspace is the strongest fit because it prevents general discovery of the workspace by the broader organization and limits awareness to invited or authorized members. Option B, Open, is completely inappropriate because it allows broad access. Option D, By request, would allow members to see that the workspace exists and request access, which does not meet the “non-public” requirement. Option C, Invite-only, sounds restrictive, but hidden is the better answer when even the existence of the workspace should not be broadly visible. For confidential M & A work, the consultant must design for privacy, controlled membership, and minimized information exposure. A hidden workspace provides the right access posture for sensitive strategic work where visibility itself could create risk.

==========

The best recommendation is to collaborate through multi-workspace channels. The scenario requires long-term collaboration across departments that sit in different workspaces, including finance and legal, while keeping the acquisition private. Multi-workspace channels are designed for this Enterprise Grid pattern because they allow a channel to exist across selected workspaces without forcing every participant into a new workspace or duplicating conversations across separate channels. The channel can be private, tightly scoped, and available only to the required participants from each relevant workspace. Option A creates a separate hidden workspace, but that is heavier than necessary and can isolate work from the departments’ existing collaboration context. Option C introduces public channels for acquisition work, which is inappropriate because the acquisition is confidential. Option D puts everything in a global workspace, which risks over-centralizing sensitive work and may not align with the departments’ existing workspaces. Multi-workspace channels preserve confidentiality while supporting cross-functional collaboration in place.

Reference topic: Grid Design — multi-workspace channels, confidential cross-functional collaboration, private channel design, and Enterprise Grid workspace architecture.

==========

The correct answer is B . Grid design should be based on how work and information naturally flow across the organization. The consultant needs to understand whether teams collaborate mostly by function, geography, department, business unit, external partnership, confidentiality level, project type, or cross-functional initiative. That discovery input directly informs whether the client needs one global workspace, multiple functional workspaces, a social workspace, an external workspace, restricted workspaces, or multi-workspace channels. Option A is useful for app and integration planning, but app usage does not define the core workspace architecture. Option C may matter if the client has active or expected acquisitions, but it is too narrow to be the most generally helpful grid-design input. Option D can provide insight into collaboration culture and security posture, but public/private channel ratios alone do not explain how information should be structured across workspaces. The strongest grid design recommendation is evidence-based and aligned to real information-sharing patterns.

==========

The correct answer is C. Roles Admin. In Enterprise Grid governance, the role model determines who can administer users, channels, compliance, and role assignments. The question asks which role gives maximum flexibility to control non-admin member permissions. The Roles Admin is the best fit because this role is centered on role and permission management rather than a narrow operational function. Option A, Compliance Admin, is focused on compliance-related functions and is not designed for broad member-permission control. Option B, Users Admin, is related to user lifecycle and membership administration, but it does not provide the same role-governance flexibility. Option D, Channels Admin, is channel-focused and would be too limited for controlling broad non-admin member permissions. The tested concept is role-based governance on Enterprise Grid: administrative power should be delegated according to the function being controlled. Where the client needs flexibility around roles and permissions, the Roles Admin function is the logical recommendation.

The correct answer is A . When a Slack Connect channel exists between a migrating workspace and the destination grid org, it is no longer truly an external Slack Connect relationship after the workspace becomes part of the same Enterprise Grid. The channel is converted into a multi-workspace channel. Because the channel is private on the migrating workspace, the safer and more restrictive privacy state is preserved post-migration, so it becomes a private multi-workspace channel . Option B is wrong because the channel spans the migrating workspace and the grid org, so it does not simply become a single-workspace channel. Option C is incorrect because after migration, the relationship is internal to the same Enterprise Grid rather than external Slack Connect. Option D is tempting because the channel is public on the grid org side, but preserving confidentiality requires honoring the private state. Migration planning must account for these channel-state changes so admins understand what users will see after the workspace joins the grid.

==========