PSM-I Exam Dumps - Professional Scrum Master I

According to the Scrum Guide 1 , the Sprint Review is an informal meeting at the end of the Sprint, where the Scrum Team and stakeholders collaborate about what was done in the Sprint. Based on that and any changes to the Product Backlog during the Sprint, attendees collaborate on what to do next. The Product Owner explains what Product Backlog items have been “Done” and what has not been “Done”; the Development Team discusses what went well during the Sprint, what problems it ran into, and how those problems were solved; and the Development Team demonstrates the work that it has “Done” and answers questions about the Increment. The entire group collaborates on what to do next, so that the Sprint Review provides valuable input to subsequent Sprint Planning. The Sprint Review is mainly an inspect and adapt opportunity for the Scrum Team and stakeholders.

The correct answer is C, because if burndown charts are used to visualize progress, they track work remaining across time. A burndown chart is a graphical representation of the amount of work left to do versus the time available. It helps the Scrum Team monitor and forecast the progress toward the Sprint Goal.

In Scrum, the term " done " refers to the state where the Increment meets the Definition of Done (DoD), which is a shared understanding within the Scrum Team of what it means for work to be complete. The best two answers are:

C. No work is left to meet the Definition of Done: This statement aligns with the Scrum Guide, which states that the Increment must be in a usable condition and meet the DoD by the end of the Sprint. The DoD ensures that the work is fully completed, tested, and integrated, leaving no outstanding tasks.

D. Ready to be released to end users: This reflects the goal of Scrum that the Increment should be in a potentially releasable state at the end of each Sprint, meaning it is of sufficient quality and functionality to be delivered to users if the Product Owner chooses to do so.

The other options are incorrect because:

A. Ready for integration: While integration is part of the process, " done " implies more than just being ready for integration; it includes being fully completed and meeting the DoD.

B. All work the Developers are willing to do: This is subjective and does not align with the objective standard of the DoD, which is agreed upon by the entire Scrum Team.

E. Whatever the Product Owner defines as quality: The DoD is a team responsibility, not solely defined by the Product Owner, ensuring a collective standard rather than an individual judgment.

According to the Scrum Guide 1 , the heart of Scrum is a Sprint, a time-box of one month or less during which a “Done”, useable, and potentially releasable product Increment is created. Sprints have consistent durations throughout a development effort. A new Sprint starts immediately after the conclusion of the previous Sprint. The length of a Sprint should be short enough to keep the business risk acceptable to the Product Owner, short enough to be able to synchronize the development work with other business events, and no more than one calendar month.

 According to the Scrum Guide, a Development Team needs a Sprint Goal because it provides guidance and focus for building an Increment that delivers value. The other options are not valid reasons for having a Sprint Goal, as they are either incorrect (such as giving purpose only to Sprint 0 or ensuring implementation of all Product Backlog items) or irrelevant (such as knowing everything from the Product Backlog).

According to the Scrum Guide, the Development Team is responsible for creating a “Done” Increment that meets the Definition of “Done”. User documentation is part of the Definition of “Done” in this scenario, so the Development Team must create it. The other options are not consistent with Scrum values and principles, such as self-organization, cross-functionality, and empiricism.

According to the Scrum Guide 1 , the Sprint Goal is an objective set for the Sprint that can be met through the implementation of Product Backlog. It provides guidance to the Developers on why it is building the Increment. It also provides a basis for inspecting and adapting during the Sprint Review and Sprint Retrospective. The Sprint Goal is a result of Sprint Planning, as is the Sprint Backlog.

The Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to inspect itself and create a plan for improvements to be enacted during the next Sprint. The topics that are appropriate for discussion are those that relate to how the team does its work, such as processes, tools, communication, collaboration, quality, etc. The value of work currently represented in the Product Backlog and arranging the Sprint Backlog for the next Sprint are not appropriate topics for discussion in a Sprint Retrospective, as they belong to the Sprint Review and Sprint Planning events respectively.