OMG-OCUP2-FOUND100 Exam Dumps - OMG Certified UML Professional 2 (OCUP 2) - Foundation Level

The diagram shows a UML Sequence Diagram where two messages are being exchanged between lifelines representing instances of objects:m(C)is being sent fromv1tov2, andm(D)is being sent back fromv2tov1.

In a sequence diagram, the vertical order of message arrows shows the sequence of interactions, with time proceeding down the page. Since the messagem(C)is shown abovem(D), this means thatm(C)occurs beforem(D). The receipt ofm(C)byv2[B]must therefore occur beforev2[B]can sendm(D)back tov1[B].

Therefore, the statement "Receivingm(C)must come before sendingm(D)" is always true in this diagram.

B, C, and D are not necessarily true based on the diagram alone: B) "Sending m(D) is the first occurrence of this scenario" is not depicted. C) "Receiving m(D) is the last occurrence of this scenario" is also not depicted. D) "All occurrences of v[1] will happen before all occurrences of v[3]" is not something we can infer from this diagram since v[3] is not involved in the interactions shown.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. Receiving m(C) must come before sending m(D).

An OpaqueExpression in UML 2 is used to specify behavior in a textual form when it is not necessary to specify which language is used, or when it is not possible to use graphical notation. According to the UML 2 specification, an OpaqueExpression is not limited to any particular language; it can represent expressions written in any language.

The key characteristics of an OpaqueExpression are as follows:

• The 'body' of an OpaqueExpression is a sequence of strings, where each string could be written in a different language. This means it has the capacity to include multiple languages simultaneously.
• The 'language' attribute is optional and is used to indicate the languages of the respective 'body' parts.

The allowance for any language is clearly stated in the UML 2 Infrastructure Specification. OpaqueExpression is designed to be a flexible way to capture expressions that are not readily expressible in UML or when using a language outside the scope of UML (e.g., mathematical expressions, programming languages, or other domain-specific languages).

In UML 2, a class diagram is used to depict the structure of a system by showing the system's classes, their attributes, operations (or methods), and the relationships among the classes. The constraint{age >= 18}in thePersonclass diagram indicates a condition that must hold true for the instances of thePersonclass whenever they are used in the context of aBankAccount. This constraint is an invariant of thePersonclass that specifies the rule for the attributeage.

Now, let's consider the provided options and explain why option B is correct:

A. The preferred age to open a bank account is 18 years old or older – This statement is incorrect because the diagram does not indicate a preference; it indicates a constraint or a rule.

B. Only customers who are 18 years old or older can open a bank account – This is the correct statement. The{age >= 18}constraint next to theageattribute of thePersonclass signifies that any instance ofPersonassociated with aBankAccountmust be at least 18 years old. SincePersonis connected toBankAccountwith the role namecustomer, this implies that only persons who are at least 18 can be customers of a bank account.

C. The age condition should only hold when the setAge(Integer) function is called – This statement is incorrect because the constraint{age >= 18}is not a condition that applies only when thesetAgeoperation is invoked. Instead, it is a class invariant that must always hold true for any instance ofPerson.

D. An object of Customer with age set to 18 or greater will raise an exception – This is incorrect because the UML diagram specifies a constraint, not an exception condition. The constraint ensures validity, not the raising of an exception.

The answer is verified according to the UML 2 Foundation documents, such as the UML 2.5 specification, where class diagrams and constraints are defined. The specification states that constraints are semantic conditions or restrictions expressed in natural language text or in a machine-readable language that must hold true for the system being modeled (UML 2.5 specification, section 7.9).

In the context of the given scenario, the Use Case "Manage customer information" appears to be a general use case that encompasses the functionalities of adding, deleting, and updating customer information. The specific functionalities are represented by separate use cases, namely "Add new customer", "Delete customer", and "Update customer information".

In UML Use Case diagrams, the «include» relationship should be used when a use case implicitly requires the capabilities of another. However, when the use case is a higher-level description that can be further elaborated into more specific use cases, the «extend» relationship is more appropriate, but in the reverse direction as shown in Option B.

Option B correctly uses the generalization relationship which is not depicted by any arrows or lines but by a whole-part structure, indicating that the specific use cases are a part of the general "Manage customer information" use case.

Option A shows the "Manage customer information" use case extending the specific use cases, which is not correct given the context.

Option C incorrectly uses «include» relationships, implying that the "Manage customer information" use case always requires the included use cases.

Option D has the «extend» relationships backward, which is not aligned with the scenario described.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

B. Option B

In UML sequence diagrams, an execution specification is represented by a thin rectangle along a lifeline. It shows where in time the execution takes place, starting with the initiation of an operation or process and ending when that process is complete.

In the interaction diagram provided, we can see an execution specification on the lifelinep1: Pthat starts after the message corresponding to point 3 is received and ends just before the message corresponding to point 5 is sent. This means the execution specification is bracketed by points 3 and 5.

Points 1 and 2 represent message sends, 1 and 4 could represent a message send and receive for the same message, which doesn't typically represent the full execution specification. Points 2 and 3 don't represent a logical start and end of an execution specification because they're on different lifelines.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

D. 3, 5