MLS-C01 Exam Dumps - AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty

For a repository containing a large and dynamically scaling collection of images, Amazon S3 is ideal due to its scalability and versioning capabilities. Amazon S3 natively supports automatic scaling to accommodate increasing storage needs and allows versioning, which enables tracking and managing different versions of objects.

To meet the requirement of maintaining multiple, immediately accessible copies of data across AWS Regions, S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) can be enabled. CRR automatically replicates new or updated objects to a specified destination bucket in another AWS Region, ensuring low-latency access and disaster recovery. By setting up CRR with versioning enabled, the data scientist can achieve a multi-Region, scalable, and version-controlled repository in Amazon S3.

 The best strategy to identify fraudulent accounts is to create a FindMatches machine learning transform in AWS Glue. The FindMatches transform enables you to identify duplicate or matching records in your dataset, even when the records do not have a common unique identifier and no fields match exactly. This can help you improve fraud detection by finding accounts that are associated with a previously known fraudulent user. You can teach the FindMatches transform your definition of a “duplicate” or a “match” through examples, and it will use machine learning to identify other potential duplicates or matches in your dataset. You can then use the FindMatches transform in your AWS Glue ETL jobs to cleanse your data.

Option A is incorrect because there is no built-in FindDuplicates Amazon Athena query. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. However, Amazon Athena does not provide a predefined query to find duplicate records in a dataset. You would have to write your own SQL query to perform this task, which might not be as effective or accurate as using the FindMatches transform.

Option C is incorrect because creating an AWS Glue crawler to infer duplicate accounts in the source data is not a valid strategy. An AWS Glue crawler is a program that connects to a data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then creates metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. A crawler does not perform any data cleansing or record matching tasks.

Option D is incorrect because searching for duplicate accounts in the AWS Glue Data Catalog is not a feasible strategy. The AWS Glue Data Catalog is a central repository to store structural and operational metadata for your data assets. The Data Catalog does not store the actual data, but rather the metadata that describes where the data is located, how it is formatted, and what it contains. Therefore, you cannot search for duplicate records in the Data Catalog.

Record matching with AWS Lake Formation FindMatches - AWS Glue

Amazon Athena – Interactive SQL Queries for Data in Amazon S3

AWS Glue Crawlers - AWS Glue

AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue

 The problem of detecting specific types of weeds and their location within the field is an example of object detection, which is a type of machine learning model that identifies and localizes objects in an image. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in object detection algorithm that uses a single-shot multibox detector (SSD) to perform real-time inference on streaming images. The SSD algorithm can handle multiple objects of varying sizes and scales in an image, and generate bounding boxes and scores for each object category. Therefore, option C is the best approach to obtain accurate predictions.

Option A is incorrect because image classification is a type of machine learning model that assigns a label to an image based on predefined categories. Image classification is not suitable for localizing objects within an image, as it does not provide bounding boxes or scores for each object. Option B is incorrect because Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytical queries. Apache Parquet is not suitable for storing images, as it does not preserve the spatial information of the pixels. Option D is incorrect because it combines the wrong format (Apache Parquet) and the wrong algorithm (image classification) for the given problem, as explained in options A and B.

Object Detection algorithm now available in Amazon SageMaker

Image classification and object detection using Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels and Amazon SageMaker JumpStart

Object Detection with Amazon SageMaker - W3Schools

aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-tensorflow-object-detection-api

 Regularization and dropouts are techniques that can help reduce overfitting in deep learning models. Overfitting occurs when the model learns too much from the training data and fails to generalize well to new data. Regularization adds a penalty term to the loss function that penalizes the model for having large or complex weights. This prevents the model from memorizing the noise or irrelevant features in the training data. L1 and L2 are two types of regularization that differ in how they calculate the penalty term. L1 regularization uses the absolute value of the weights, while L2 regularization uses the square of the weights. Dropouts are another technique that randomly drops out some units or neurons from the network during training. This creates a thinner network that is less prone to overfitting. Dropouts also act as a form of ensemble learning, where multiple sub-models are combined to produce a better prediction. By applying regularization and dropouts to the training, the web-based company can improve the generalization and accuracy of its deep learning model on the test and validation data. References:

Regularization: A video that explains the concept and benefits of regularization in deep learning.

Dropout: A video that demonstrates how dropout works and why it helps reduce overfitting.

A recurrent neural network (RNN) is a type of neural network that can process sequential data, such as time series, by maintaining a hidden state that captures the temporal dependencies between the inputs. RNNs are well suited for predicting future events based on past observations, such as forecasting engine failures based on sensor readings. To train an RNN model, the data needs to be labeled with the target variable, which in this case is the type and time of the engine fault. This makes the problem a supervised learning problem, where the goal is to learn a mapping from the input sequence (sensor readings) to the output sequence (engine faults). By using an RNN model, the manufacturer can leverage the temporal information in the data and detect patterns that indicate when an engine might need maintenance for a certain fault.

Recurrent Neural Networks - Amazon SageMaker

Use Amazon SageMaker Built-in Algorithms or Pre-trained Models

Recurrent Neural Network Definition | DeepAI

What are Recurrent Neural Networks? An Ultimate Guide for Newbies!

Lee and Carter go Machine Learning: Recurrent Neural Networks - SSRN

The problem involves assigning multiple related, non-mutually exclusive categories (like "yogurt", "snack", and "dairy product") to customer comments referencing specific products. Amazon Comprehend provides custom classification capabilities, and in this case, the appropriate mode is multi-label, not multi-class.

“Use multi-label mode when each document can belong to more than one class. This is appropriate for situations where the categories are not mutually exclusive.”

This allows a single document to be tagged with several relevant labels simultaneously, which is precisely the use case described.

The best way to meet the requirements is to use a principal component analysis (PCA) model, which is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original variables into a smaller set of new variables, called principal components, that capture most of the variance and information in the data1. This technique has the following advantages:

It can increase the accuracy of the model by removing noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity from the data, and by enhancing the interpretability and generalization of the model23.

It can decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the number of features and the computational complexity of the model, and by improving the convergence and stability of the model45.

It is suitable for numeric variables, as it relies on the covariance or correlation matrix of the data, and it can handle a large quantity of variables, as it can extract the most relevant ones16.

The other options are not effective or appropriate, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Creating new features and interaction variables can increase the accuracy of the model by capturing more complex and nonlinear relationships in the data, but it can also increase the processing time of the model by adding more features and increasing the computational complexity of the model7. Moreover, it can introduce more noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity in the data, which can degrade the performance and interpretability of the model8.

C: Applying normalization on the feature set can increase the accuracy of the model by scaling the features to a common range and avoiding the dominance of some features over others, but it can also decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the numerical instability and improving the convergence of the model . However, normalization alone is not enough to address the high dimensionality and high latency issues of the dataset, as it does not reduce the number of features or the variance in the data.

D: Using a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) model is not suitable for numeric variables, as it is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original categorical variables into a smaller set of new variables, called factors, that capture most of the inertia and information in the data. MCA is similar to PCA, but it is designed for nominal or ordinal variables, not for continuous or interval variables.

1: Principal Component Analysis - Amazon SageMaker

2: How to Use PCA for Data Visualization and Improved Performance in Machine Learning | by Pratik Shukla | Towards Data Science

3: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Feature Selection and some of its Pitfalls | by Nagesh Singh Chauhan | Towards Data Science

4: How to Reduce Dimensionality with PCA and Train a Support Vector Machine in Python | by James Briggs | Towards Data Science

5: Dimensionality Reduction and Its Applications | by Aniruddha Bhandari | Towards Data Science

6: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in Python | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

7: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning | by Dipanjan (DJ) Sarkar | Towards Data Science

8: Feature Engineering — How to Engineer Features and How to Get Good at It | by Parul Pandey | Towards Data Science

[Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization | by Benjamin Obi Tayo Ph.D. | Towards Data Science]

[Why, How and When to Scale your Features | by George Seif | Towards Data Science]

[Normalization vs Dimensionality Reduction | by Saurabh Annadate | Towards Data Science]

[Multiple Correspondence Analysis - Amazon SageMaker]

[Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) | by Raul Eulogio | Towards Data Science]

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can catalogue, clean, enrich, and move data between various data stores. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that can run SQL queries on data stored in Amazon S3. By using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries, the Machine Learning Specialist can leverage the existing data in Amazon S3 without any additional data transformation or loading. This solution requires the least effort compared to the other options, which involve more complex and costly data processing and storage services. References: AWS Glue, Amazon Athena