Managing-Cloud-Security Exam Dumps - WGU Managing Cloud Security (JY02, GZO1)

Bollards are physical barriers designed to prevent vehicles from ramming into or breaching secure facilities. They are often placed at entrances, around perimeters, or in front of critical infrastructure like data centers.

Locks, cameras, and fences provide important physical security, but they cannot stop a high-speed vehicle from causing damage. Cameras record activity, fences create boundaries, and locks secure access points, but only bollards physically block or mitigate vehicle attacks.

Governmental and critical infrastructure sites commonly deploy bollards to protect against both accidental collisions and deliberate vehicle-borne attacks. Combined with layered security measures—such as surveillance and fencing—they enhance resilience against physical threats to sensitive data centers.

A third-party attestation should be used by consumers to determine whether a cloud service provider meets regulatory and legal compliance requirements. Managing Cloud principles explain that independent audits and attestations provide objective evidence of compliance.

Third-party attestations validate that a provider has implemented required controls and follows recognized standards. These reports reduce the need for customers to perform direct audits and increase trust in the provider’s security and compliance posture.

Warrants relate to law enforcement, regulatory obligations define requirements but do not prove compliance, and contracts outline responsibilities but do not independently verify adherence. Therefore, third-party attestation is the correct answer.

Content-based discovery involves searching within the actual text or binary content of documents to find matches for keywords, phrases, or patterns. In e-discovery, when the requirement is to locate documents containing a specific phrase, searching based on content is the most direct and reliable method.

Other approaches, such as metadata-based discovery, only examine properties like creation date or author, which do not reveal the presence of specific text. Label-based discovery relies on pre-applied classification labels, which may not always be accurate. Location-based discovery limits searches to folders or storage locations but does not guarantee relevance.

Content-based discovery provides completeness in legal and regulatory investigations. It ensures that no relevant documents are overlooked simply because of inconsistent labeling or metadata, thus supporting compliance and defensibility in court proceedings.

The Stored Communications Act (SCA) restricts the government’s ability to force a cloud service provider to disclose customer data. Managing Cloud guidance explains that the SCA establishes legal protections for stored electronic communications and customer records held by service providers.

The act defines conditions under which government entities may request access to stored data, requiring appropriate legal processes such as warrants or court orders. This provides a level of privacy protection for cloud customers and limits unauthorized or excessive disclosure.

GLBA focuses on financial data, SOX addresses corporate governance, and ECPA is broader legislation that includes the SCA but does not directly define cloud disclosure limitations on its own. Therefore, SCA is the correct answer.

ISO/IEC 27050-1:2016 is the guide that addresses the international challenges of cloud forensics and is recognized as the premier standard for electronic discovery (eDiscovery). Managing Cloud documentation explains that eDiscovery involves identifying, collecting, preserving, and producing electronically stored information in legal proceedings.

This standard provides guidance for handling digital evidence across jurisdictions, which is especially important in cloud environments where data may reside in multiple countries. It establishes consistent processes and terminology to support legal defensibility and compliance.

The other ISO standards address evidence handling, investigation readiness, or incident management, but ISO/IEC 27050 specifically focuses on eDiscovery. Therefore, ISO/IEC 27050-1:2016 is the correct answer.

Federal agencies in the U.S. rely on NIST SP 800-37, Risk Management Framework (RMF), to manage enterprise risk. RMF provides a structured process for categorizing systems, selecting controls, implementing safeguards, assessing effectiveness, authorizing operations, and continuous monitoring.

ISO 37500 deals with outsourcing governance, SSAE 18 governs service provider audits, and COSO is a corporate governance framework but not specific to federal agencies.

NIST RMF is integrated with the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) requirements, ensuring agencies manage cybersecurity risks consistently. Its adoption is expanding beyond government into industries seeking comprehensive, repeatable risk management processes.

Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) is an API format that provides a framework for exchanging structured information using web services. Managing Cloud principles explain that SOAP is a protocol-based messaging standard that relies on XML for message formatting.

SOAP defines strict standards for message structure, communication protocols, and error handling, making it suitable for enterprise environments that require reliability, security, and formal contracts. It supports features such as authentication, encryption, and transaction integrity.

The other options describe characteristics of RESTful APIs. SOAP is XML-based and does not support multiple data formats. Therefore, the correct description is the structured web service framework.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) requires the greatest level of consumer responsibility for security. Managing Cloud documentation explains that in the shared responsibility model, IaaS providers supply virtualized infrastructure components such as compute, storage, and networking, while consumers manage everything above that layer.

Customers are responsible for securing operating systems, applications, data, access controls, patching, and configuration management. This includes vulnerability management, endpoint security, identity management, and monitoring. While this model provides flexibility and control, it also demands strong security expertise and governance.

In contrast, PaaS and SaaS shift more security responsibilities to the provider, and DBaaS abstracts database management. Therefore, IaaS places the highest security responsibility on the consumer.