Managing-Cloud-Security Exam Dumps - WGU Managing Cloud Security (JY02)

Arollbackis the safeguard that restores a system to its previous, stable state when a new code release introduces issues. In DevOps workflows, rollbacks provide a rapid recovery mechanism, reducing downtime and minimizing customer impact.

Staging, code review, and testing are preventive controls that reduce the likelihood of defects reaching production, but once a bug has already been deployed, rollback is the corrective control.

Rollback strategies often rely on version control systems, container orchestration, or infrastructure-as-code automation to quickly revert to earlier configurations. This practice is essential for maintaining reliability and availability, especially in cloud environments with continuous deployment pipelines.

Asandboxis a controlled, isolated environment used to safely run, observe, and analyze potentially malicious code. In cybersecurity, sandboxes allow analysts to execute malware samples without risking contamination of production systems. This enables identification of malware behavior, persistence techniques, and indicators of compromise.

Encryption protects confidentiality, but does not allow safe execution. Gateways control traffic flow, and controllers manage devices or workloads. Only a sandbox provides the dedicated containment required for malware analysis.

In cloud environments, sandboxing is often implemented at scale to analyze suspicious files or traffic automatically. This practice enhances defenses against zero-day exploits, advanced persistent threats, and polymorphic malware. By preventing malware from escaping, sandboxes provide essential forensic and detection insights without endangering the wider environment.

In cloud environments, the provider’s role in thechain of custodyprimarily involvescollecting and preserving digital evidencewhen incidents or investigations occur. Because providers manage the infrastructure, they have direct access to logs, storage systems, and virtual machines necessary for evidence collection.

Backup policies and incident response may involve collaboration, but they remain customer responsibilities in many service models. Data classification and analysis are business-driven tasks, which customers must handle.

Providers must ensure that evidence collection is forensically sound and documented properly to maintain legal admissibility. This responsibility is critical in maintaining trust and ensuring compliance with laws and contractual obligations. It reinforces the shared responsibility model by clearly defining which aspects of digital forensics belong to the provider.

While cloud providers typically offer built-in encryption, customers should applyadditional encryptionfor sensitive data to maintain defense-in-depth. Encrypting files and folders before uploading them ensures that even if provider-side protections fail, data remains confidential.

WAFs protect applications from web threats, DAM tools monitor database use, and block storage versus file storage is an architecture choice. None of these directly provide an extra protective layer for stored data.

By maintaining control of their encryption keys, customers ensure compliance with data protection standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS. This practice also mitigates insider threats within the provider’s environment and supports secure multi-cloud strategies. Encryption remains the strongest safeguard for protecting sensitive files in public cloud storage.

The scenario arises because ofmultitenancy, a core cloud characteristic where multiple customers share the same physical infrastructure. If a storage device containing multiple tenants’ data is seized as part of a case involving another customer, unrelated organizations may still be affected.

Virtualization enables resource abstraction, but multitenancy specifically introduces shared infrastructure risks. SaaS and PaaS are service models, not architectural characteristics.

Multitenancy offers efficiency and cost benefits but raises challenges for data sovereignty, legal jurisdiction, and evidentiary control. Providers mitigate these risks through encryption, logical isolation, and contractual terms. Customers must understand these implications when handling regulated or sensitive data in cloud environments.

Without a clear understanding of infrastructure and software, the leadership team must first conduct aninventory of assets. An asset inventory provides a comprehensive list of hardware, software, and services that support business operations.

Creating checklists, defining criteria, and assigning roles are important, but they rely on knowing what assets exist. Without an inventory, the disaster recovery plan would miss critical dependencies, making recovery incomplete or impossible.

Performing an inventory supports business impact analysis, risk assessments, and recovery prioritization. It ensures that all critical systems are accounted for and appropriate recovery strategies can be designed. Asset inventories are a foundational best practice for disaster recovery and continuity planning.

Outside the United States,ISAE 3402 (International Standard on Assurance Engagements 3402)is the standard used for audits equivalent to SOC reports. It ensures that service organizations demonstrate adequate internal controls over financial reporting and operational processes.

SSAE 18 is the U.S. standard governing SOC audits. ISRE 2400 and SSARS 25 focus on accounting and review services, not assurance over service organizations.

ISAE 3402 provides assurance to international customers that cloud providers or service organizations meet rigorous standards for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. This builds global trust and interoperability in compliance frameworks.

When a required PCI DSS control cannot be implemented due to technical limitations, the organization must apply acompensating control. A compensating control is an alternative safeguard that meets the intent and rigor of the original requirement.

Risk acceptance is insufficient under PCI DSS, as compliance demands enforceable safeguards. Privacy controls and protection levels may enhance data security but do not formally replace mandatory encryption requirements.

For example, a provider may use strict access controls, network segmentation, or monitoring to mitigate risks from unencrypted cardholder data. Documenting these compensating controls is essential during audits, ensuring compliance despite system limitations.