L4M8 Exam Dumps - Procurement and Supply in Practice

A contract is written or verbal agreement, made between two or more parties that are legally en-forceable. For a contract to be legally binding it must include intention of parties entering into the contracts. All parties must have the capacity to contract or be contracted. They must be of a sound mind, there should be a promise (offer) for performance from the other party and an exchange (consideration) of one thing for another within an agreement for contract to be binding, there must be an acceptance of the offeror’s offer by the offeree.

There are many reasons contract can legally be terminated, including non-performance by one or both parties, a significant change in the requirement.

There are several reasons contract can legally be terminated, including non-performance by one or both parties; breach of material, failure to meet service level agreement, ethical breaches, a significant change in the requirement of either party caused by ethical change in the market, change in Demand, obsolescence, contract completion. The procurement professionals should get an exit strategy that should encourage a stress free disengagement should incase there are no profitable reason to continue with the contract.

•

Refer to the question column for response

Stakeholder are individuals or organizations that can be affected directly or indirectly by any project or decision. For successful procurement activities to take place, stakeholders must be identified, engaged and managed. Not all stakeholders require the same level of engagement and management. To appropriately manage identified stakeholders, the Mendelow management matrix has categorized stakeholders in four quadrants, according to how low or high their power and interest in the project could be. The four categories are:

1) Minimum effort (low power-Low interest)

2) Keep satisfied (high power-Low interest)

3) Keep informed (Low power – high interest)

4) Manage closely (High power- High interest)

In the decision to not run out of supplies, organizations can anticipate a peak were by it products will be in a high demand or a period of scarcity of raw materials and may want to increase the in-ventory. However, if this forecast is not accurate, it may lead the organization to holding excess inventory. This can expose the organization to some negative factors.

Acquisition Cost: The organization will incur an acquisition cost for the excess inventory which is inclusive of the cost of placing the order and the cost of purchasing the goods.

Holding Cost: The organization will spend more money holding the stock, trying to keep it in good condition by providing the required light, temperature, skilled handlers and so on.

Working Capital not adding value: This will off shoot the holding cost. Also valuable working capital in excess stock which in the time not adding value, can affect the liquidity of the business. This is also an opportunity cost and increase solvency.

•

Refer to the question column for response

2(a) Outline the financial data that can be used in the process of supplier selection. (10 marks)

When selecting a supplier, the buyer should assess financial data to judge whether the supplier is financially stable and capable of delivering the contract.

One key source is the balance sheet , which shows the supplier’s assets, liabilities and overall financial position at a point in time. This helps the buyer assess net worth, debt levels and short-term financial strength.

Second , the income statement or profit and loss account shows revenue, costs and profit over a period. This helps the buyer understand whether the supplier is profitable and commercially sustainable.

Third , the cash flow statement is important because it shows whether the supplier is generating enough cash to fund operations and meet obligations. A profitable business can still fail if it has weak cash flow.

Fourth , buyers can use the annual report , including directors’ comments and risk disclosures, to understand broader business performance and future outlook.

Fifth , buyers often calculate financial ratios such as:

liquidity ratios like the current ratio and quick ratio

profitability ratios such as net profit margin

gearing ratios to assess dependence on borrowing.

Finally , the buyer may review financial trends over time and use independent credit reports or external financial checks from trusted sources.

Overall, these data sources help the buyer decide whether the supplier is financially strong enough to perform the contract.

2(b) Explain THREE potential concerns for a buying organisation of selecting a supplier that has a current ratio of 0.67:1. (15 marks)

A current ratio of 0.67:1 means the supplier has only £0.67 of current assets for every £1 of current liabilities . This suggests weak short-term liquidity and creates several concerns for the buyer.

1. Difficulty meeting short-term obligations

The first concern is that the supplier may struggle to pay short-term debts such as wages, bills, subcontractors or software costs. If liabilities are higher than current assets, the supplier may face cash pressure. For the buyer, this raises concerns about whether the supplier can operate reliably throughout the contract.

2. Risk of poor performance or service disruption

A weak current ratio may mean the supplier has limited working capital to support day-to-day operations. In an IT services contract, this could affect staffing, maintenance, upgrades or continuity of service. For a local government department, any disruption could be serious because public services may depend on the supplier’s performance.

3. Greater financial fragility

The third concern is that the supplier may rely too heavily on overdrafts, loans or faster customer payments to survive. This makes the supplier more financially vulnerable. If costs rise or cash inflows slow down, the supplier may experience serious financial difficulty or even fail during the contract.

In conclusion, a current ratio of 0.67:1 is a warning sign because it suggests weak liquidity. It does not automatically mean the supplier should be rejected, but the buying organisation should carry out further financial checks before awarding the contract.

Fraud occurs when a person acts deliberately to secure monies from another party through dishonest method. Within the supply chain of an organization, fraud can represent itself in the following ways:

1. Kickbacks: e.g. (commission given to a bribe taker for service perform)

2. Corrupt influence (e.g ordering more than what is required)

3. Collusion: (group of suppliers working together to submit multiple bids and split profit.

4. Bid Rigging (a contract is informally agreed with a chosen supplier prior to the official process

5. invoicing fraud

6. Substitution (submitting products that are below the required quality

7. False claims (files false document)

•

Refer to the question column for response

Trying to measure how sustainable an organization was use to be challenging undertaking. However, during the 1990s, a concept brought up by American John Elkington change the way sustainability was measured. This framework is known as the triple bottom line (TBL) and measures sustainability in relation to organizational performance and investment against the 3Ps (1) Profits (2) People (3) Planet. For example;

Profit: A packaging manufacturer reinvesting its profits in State- of-the-art recycling machinery for it wasted cardboard.

People: A large privately owned call centre donate its end of life computers to a local youth clubs and social groups to help gain internet cases.

Planet: A driving instructors using only hybrid vehicles to teach her learners, thus to reducing Co2 emission.

•

Refer to the question column for response

Once the need has been understood, defined, justified and authorized, the next stages are to analyze and test the market. Analyzing and testing the market includes looking at the following

1. STEEPLE analysis

2. SWOT analysis

3. Porter’s five forces

4. Level of suppliers competition

5. Supply and demand

6. Push and pull

7. Supplier segmentation

8. Product life cycle

9. Ansoff matrix

10. Early supplier involvement

11. Make or buy

12. Offshoring

1. Porter’s five forces: The use of porter’s five forces helps the procurement professional to understand the level of competition within the marketplace. Whether it is a monopoly, oligopoly, imperfect or perfect market. Knowing these will equip the organization to better negotiate a favorable price.

2. Supply and Demand: the procurement professional must also think about supply and demand as part of their market analysis when they receive a requisition. This economic factor has a significant effect on the prices charged and on the cost incurred.

3. Supplier segmentation: in this the procurement professional start to form an opinion of potential suppliers.. They can segment current suppliers into four categories, depending on their level of integration into an organization. This can help to inform the procurement professional of which type of supplier relationship that would be most appropriate.

•

Refer to the question column for response