L4M4 Exam Dumps - Ethical and Responsible Sourcing

Explanation

you would use a restricted approach when interest is likely to be high. The buyer needs a method of de-selecting unsuitable bidders and creating a shortlist of acceptable organisations.

For complex requirements you could use both an open or restrictive tender- the difference between the approaches is about how many bids you're likely to get rather than the complexity of it.

Explanation

This is an Invitation to Tender.

The only other real document listed in Request for Quotation. This is incorrect because the document asks questions relating to how they will deliver the service. This means price isn't the only factor, which is the case for a RfQ.

Request for Tender and Invitation to Quote are not real things.

Explanation

GDP = gross domestic product = "the monetary value of goods and services manufactured or sup-plied in a financial period". People use it to say whether a country's economy is strong or weak.

Stock markets look at the value of public limited companies within a country.

Commodity indices look at the value of commodities such as steel, oil and wheat at a point in time

Average changes in price over a year can be measured by CPI or PPI

Implementing full anti-bribery training, policies, and procedures demonstrates a proactive stance against bribery and corruption. Ethical sourcing principles encourage organisations to institutionalise comprehensive anti-bribery measures to ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance within the supply chain, reducing the risk of corrupt practices.

Restricted tendering is a two-stage process: first, a pre-qualification stage to ensure only capable, compliant suppliers are invited; second, the issue of the ITT to that shortlist. This method is appropriate when requirements are complex, high-value, or where assurance of supplier competence is essential. It is not based solely on price and does not rely on limited supplier numbers but on filtering through qualification. This balances transparency and efficiency, avoiding wasteful evaluation of unsuitable suppliers while still maintaining competitive tension. CIPS L4M4 highlights that restricted tendering strengthens governance, improves efficiency, and ensures due diligence in supplier selection.

Multi-sourcing allows organisations to diversify their supply base, providing flexibility, and reducing risk by having multiple suppliers. It is an effective strategy to prevent over-dependence on a single source and allows for competition among suppliers, promoting quality and ethical standards in the supply chain.

Multiple sourcing is most effective for strategically important, high-value requirements such as raw materials. These are continuous, large-volume needs where supply disruptions can be costly and damaging. By using more than one supplier, buyers reduce dependency risks, improve resilience, and increase competitive leverage. One-off requirements like machinery (A) don’t benefit from multiple sourcing, while options B and D describe disadvantages rather than reasons for adopting the approach. Responsible sourcing promotes balancing cost, risk, and resilience — and multiple sourcing is a key strategy for critical, ongoing supply categories.

Accepting an invitation under such circumstances would violate ethical standards, as it could create a conflict of interest. Ethical sourcing and procurement practices require impartiality, and any perceived favoritism or bias can harm the organisation's integrity.