L4M4 Exam Dumps - Ethical and Responsible Sourcing

In an open tender process, any supplier can submit a bid, and there is no pre-qualification stage. This approach is suitable when the requirements are well-defined, and there is a sufficient number of suppliers in the market to ensure competition. However, if too many suppliers respond, it can lead to an overwhelming number of bids to evaluate. Therefore, it's essential to consider the number of potential suppliers in the market before opting for an open tender.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"Open procedure – used for well-specified requirements and there is no pre-qualification of bidders. Many suppliers could submit a bid, which could result in lots of bids to assess, so the open procedure is normally only used where the number of potential bidders is expected to be relatively low."

Explanation

One of the biggest advantages to making an item over buying it is 'improved quality control'.

When you make the product yourself, you can set the quality parameters you require and aren't re-stricted to, or dependant on, what the supplier does. The other options are incorrect- making stuff inhouse would mean you hold more inventory. If the supplier has a higher skillset than you, you would outsource. Threat of substitutions wouldn't impact this decision.

For a list of pros and cons relating to the 'make or buy' decision see p.5. This is a hot topic for the exam.

Explanation

Open tenders should be used when the buyer expects there to be little interest / fewer bids. The opportunity is advertised widely allowing any supplier that wishes to submit a bid the opportunity.

The other options limit the number of suppliers and Ji Yuan doesn't want to do that, because he risks getting no interest and no supplier.

P.23

Explanation

Carry out due diligence is the correct answer. The other answers are incorrect:

- ensure all 46 suppliers publish an Anti Slavery Statement in line with the Modern Slavery Act is wrong because the question states that some suppliers are international. The legislation is UK, meaning international suppliers don't have to do the statement. It also only applies to companies with a turnover of £36m, and some of Zeb's suppliers may be smaller than this.

- work with less suppliers to reduce the risk of slavery entering the supply chain is a silly answer be-cause Zeb probably needs all of his suppliers. There's probably a reason he uses that many.

- ask all suppliers to get Fair Trade accredited is also a silly answer. Fair Trade only exists in some industries such as cocoa and bananas. Zig Zag Zips is in manufacturing so it's probably not going to be able to fairtrade accredit some of the stuff it buys.

Explanation

The correct answer is 'yes- because a low credit rating would indicate the supplier is financially un-stable'.

The two options beginning with no should automatically be discounted. The other option is incor-rect because credit ratings are private and would therefore not affect reputation.

Defining corrective actions and running supplier development programs are effective remedial actions following an audit. These approaches support continuous improvement, aligning with responsible sourcing by helping suppliers meet ethical and performance standards.

Incoterms, short for International Commercial Terms, were introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) in 1936. These standardized terms are used globally to define the responsibilities of buyers and sellers in international trade, helping to avoid misunderstandings by clarifying tasks, costs, and risks involved in the delivery of goods.

Questions about equal opportunity and anti-bribery policies assess the supplier's commitment to social and ethical standards. These aspects are part of the ESC criteria, which align with responsible sourcing practices by ensuring suppliers maintain ethical workforce practices and governance.