L4M3 Exam Dumps - Commercial Contracting

A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact or law which induces the representee to enter a contract. Where a statement made during the course of negotiations is classed as a representation rather than a term an action for misrepresentation may be available where the statement turns out to be untrue.

For a party to claim for misrepresentation, there must be a false statement of fact or law as oppose to opinion or estimate of future events. It does not matter whether the incorrect information is given by words or takes the form of misleading conduct.

Silence will not generally amount to a misrepresentation. However, it can become a misrepresentation in some exceptional circumstances.

In the L4M3 study guide, the author states that "A statement of law is not misrepresentation". This is untrue in both common law and civil law systems. In the UK, false statement of law will now amount to an actionable misrepresentation (see Pankhania v Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441).

If a party is induced to enter a contract based on a misrepresentation, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the misled party. This means the misled party can either rescind (cancel) the contract or affirm it and seek damages. The nature of the misrepresentation (fraudulent, negligent, or innocent) affects the availability of damages.

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts. They are not expressly set out in the contract but are taken to be as effective as if they were and as if they had been included from day one of the contract. The express terms and any implied terms together create the legally binding obligations on the parties.

A price adjustment clause, also known as a price variation or indexation clause, provides a structured method for managing potential changes in price over the contract's duration. This clause ensures that any price increase must be based on predefined and agreed-upon criteria, such as inflation rates or cost indices. This prevents arbitrary or unexpected price increases from the supplier.

Consideration refers to the exchange of something of value between the contracting parties and is a fundamental requirement for a valid contract. It can be in the form of goods, services, money, or a promise. Without consideration, there is no enforceable contract even if other elements like offer and acceptance are present.

One of the major disadvantages of tendering process is that it is lengthy, bureaucratic and slow. To reduce the preparation time, buying organisation can:

- Plan forward

- Standardise tendering documents (such as notices, terms and conditions,...) whenever possible

- Train procurement staff

- Write down policies for tender-waiver

Buying organisation should not eliminate the pre-qualification stage from all tendering processes. This stage is used as a filter to select the most competent suppliers for next stage in restricted tendering. To save time in this process, you can design a model questionnaire.

To meet labour standards, the most appropriate requirement is ethical trading certification (A) – ensuring fair wages, safe conditions, and compliance with global labour rights.

The other options relate mainly to environmental, not labour, outcomes.

SFO issued an RFQ with defined terms and condition and detailed specification. This RFQ can be considered as an invitation to treat. Vogon's quotation is an answer to the purchaser's RFQ and is an offer to SFO. The contract come to life at the time Vogon received the notification from SFO senior management.

The strike may be a force majeur event, depending on the contract particular clauses and jurisdiction. In common law countries, force majeur is applicable as an exclusion of liability only if the contract allows it. In many civil law countries, force majeur is an implied term. But in every jurisdiction, force majeur is only a reason for excluding liability for non-performance of a contract. In other words, the non-performance party is not liable for any breach if force majeur event occurs but the event does not exclude the breach.

LO 1, AC 1.2