FCSS_NST_SE-7.6 Exam Dumps - Fortinet NSE 6 - Network Security 7.6 Support Engineer

The correct answer is C. 64.26.151.37 .

The study guide explains the FortiGuard flags shown by diagnose debug rating:

D = Default

I = Initial

T = Timing

F = Failed and specifically: “F = The server is down”

So even though 121.111.236.179 has the lowest RTT in the exhibit, it has the F flag, meaning FortiGate considers that server failed/down , so it will not be chosen.

To determine which active server is selected, the FortiOS administration guide states:

“The server list is sorted first by weight. The server with the smallest RTT appears at the top of the list regardless of weight. … Therefore the top position in the list is selected based on RTT while the other positions are based on weight.”

Among the valid, non-failed choices in the exhibit:

64.26.151.37 → RTT 45

209.22.147.36 → RTT 103

96.45.33.65 → RTT 144

208.91.112.194 → RTT 107

The active server with the lowest RTT is 64.26.151.37 , so that is the server FortiGate will choose.

So the verified answer is: C .

The 7.6 study guide explains the route selection order:

“Route Selection Process

Most specific route

Lowest distance

Lowest metric (dynamic routes)

Lowest priority (static routes)

ECMP (static, BGP, and OSPF routes)”**

It then states:

“If there are multiple routes with the same netmask, distance, metric, and priority, FortiGate shares the traffic among all of them. This is called equal-cost multi-path (ECMP).”

The FortiOS administration guide confirms the ECMP prerequisite:

“Routes must have the same destination and costs. In the case of static routes costs include distance and priority.”

In the exhibit, the kernel/FIB output shows the two default routes as:

gwy=100.64.1.254 dev=3 (port1) prio=0

gwy=100.64.2.254 dev=6 (port2) prio=10

So although both are default routes, their priorities are different . Since FortiGate uses the FIB/kernel for forwarding traffic, ECMP will not happen until the static-route priorities are the same. The study guide also notes that the FIB is the table used to perform standard routing

Therefore, to make the two default routes eligible for ECMP, the administrator must make the priorities equal. Since port2 is already 10, the needed change is to set the port1 default route priority to 10.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because snat-route-change affects how existing SNAT sessions react to routing changes, not whether static routes qualify for ECMP

B is wrong because changing port2 to priority 1 still would not match port1 at 0, so the routes still would not have equal cost for ECMP

C is wrong because preserve-session-route affects existing-session route persistence after routing changes, not ECMP qualification

The issue is caused by the strict matching logic of the configured Prefix List.

Current State: The rule is edit 1 with set prefix 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 and both ge (greater than or equal) and le (less than or equal) are unset.

Behavior: When ge and le are unset, FortiOS requires an exact match of the subnet mask. The current rule only matches the exact network 172.16.0.0/16. It denies 172.16.52.0/24 because the mask (/24) does not match the rule ' s mask (/16).

To fix this and inject 172.16.52.0/24, you must modify the list to match the /24 mask:

A. Add another entry to the prefix list to specifically allow the 172.16.52.0/24 network:

Creating a new rule (e.g., edit 2) with set prefix 172.16.52.0 255.255.255.0 will provide an exact match for the incoming route, allowing it to pass the distribute-list.

B. Change the ge value to 17:

By configuring set ge 17 on the existing rule (conceptually 172.16.0.0/16 ge 17), you change the logic from " exact match " to " range match " .

This configuration tells the router to match any prefix starting with 172.16.x.x that has a subnet mask length of 17 or greater.

Since the incoming route is a /24, and 24 is greater than 17, the route will match the prefix list and be accepted.

Why other options are incorrect:

C: The option text appears to read " Change the ... value to 16 " . If this refers to le 16, it would enforce the mask to be exactly /16 or less, which still excludes /24.

D: Changing the default behavior to implicit allow defeats the purpose of a filter (security control) and is not a standard configuration step for fixing a single missing route.

The correct answer is B .

The study guide explicitly states: “IKE version 2 does not interoperate with IKE version 1, but they share enough of the header format that both versions can unambiguously operate over the same UDP port.”

That directly proves B .

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because the study guide shows authentication methods as Asymmetric for IKEv2 and Symmetric for IKEv1

C is wrong because the study guide does not say they use the same TCP port; instead, it specifically says they can operate over the same UDP port

D is wrong because the study guide states: “IKEv2 does not use the concept of phase 1 or phase 2” , even though FortiOS CLI/GUI still uses those terms for configuration purposes

When FortiGate performs SSL certificate inspection with default settings, it checks if the Server Name Indication (SNI) matches either the Common Name (CN) or any Subject Alternative Name (SAN) in the server certificate. If there is no match, FortiGate does not block the connection; instead, it uses the CN value from the certificate ' s subject field to continue web filtering and categorization.

This behavior is described in the official Fortinet 7.6.4 Administration Guide:

“Check the SNI in the hello message with the CN or SAN field in the returned server certificate: Enable: If it is mismatched, use the CN in the server certificate.” This is the default (Enable) mode, which differs from the Strict mode that would block the mismatched connection.

By default, this policy ensures service continuity and prevents disruptions due to certificate mismatches, allowing FortiGate to log and inspect based on the CN even when the requested SNI does not match. It provides a balance between connection reliability and the accuracy of filtering by certificate identity, allowing security policies to remain functional without unnecessary blocks. This approach is recommended by Fortinet to maintain usability for end-users while still supporting granular inspection.