EFM Exam Dumps - Certified - Electronic Fetal Monitoring

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

AWHONN and NICHD definitions state that fetal accelerations are a strong indicator of adequate fetal oxygenation and neurologic integrity. Accelerations reflect intact sympathetic and parasympathetic balance and adequate oxygen reserve.

Simpson & Creehan emphasize accelerations as “the most reliable sign of fetal well-being,” because they require intact autonomic function, sufficient pH, and adequate oxygenation. Menihan also identifies accelerations as the most reassuring feature on a fetal heart tracing.

Fetal movement is helpful but not directly reflective of oxygenation, as movements can decline for non-hypoxic reasons (sleep cycles, maternal sedation). Regular sleep–wake cycles are normal developmental neurologic patterns and not oxygenation markers.

Creasy & Resnik reinforce that “presence of accelerations reliably indicates absence of metabolic acidemia.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

On the tracing:

FHR consistently ranges 170–185 bpm.

Variability remains present, confirming adequate signal.

This pattern persists for the required minimum 10-minute baseline window.

NICHD/NCC define fetal tachycardia as:

Baseline > 160 bpm for at least 10 minutes

Because the FHR is well above 160 for the whole reviewable period, the baseline is tachycardic.

Why the other answers are incorrect:

A. 155 bpm — Too low; FHR visually averages well above this.

B. Indeterminate — Not applicable; variability is clear and the tracing meets the ≥10-minute rule.

Correct answer: C. Tachycardia

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

According to NCC, AWHONN, and evidence-based documentation standards, clinicians must document:

Baseline

Variability

Accelerations

Decelerations (type, depth, duration, timing)

Uterine activity

This fulfills the NICHD 3-tier system and legal documentation expectations.

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

B. "Normal/abnormal" → vague, not an acceptable documentation standard.

C. Category alone → insufficient; categories must be supported by the components.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

The tracing demonstrates a baseline within normal limits, moderate variability, and recurrent variable decelerations associated with contractions. According to NICHD/NCC definitions reproduced in AWHONN’s Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices and Menihan’s Electronic Fetal Monitoring, recurrent variable decelerations with preserved variability classify the tracing as Category II.

A Category I pattern must show baseline 110–160, moderate variability, and absence of late or variable decelerations. Because this tracing shows recurrent variable decelerations, it does not meet Category I criteria.

Category III requires absent variability PLUS recurrent late decelerations, recurrent variable decelerations, bradycardia, or a sinusoidal pattern. This tracing shows moderate variability, therefore it cannot be Category III.

Simpson & Creehan emphasize that variable decelerations reflect cord compression and fall into Category II unless accompanied by absent variability. Miller’s Pocket Guide confirms that moderate variability maintains fetal compensatory reserve, keeping the pattern in Category II.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (NCC-Referenced Sources)

According to AWHONN, Simpson, and NCC C-EFM physiologic competencies, uterine rupture commonly presents with:

Sudden prolonged deceleration

Recurrent variables

Fetal bradycardia

Possible loss of station, vaginal bleeding, maternal pain

AWHONN specifically lists:

“Prolonged deceleration is the most common initial fetal sign of uterine rupture.”

Absent variability can occur later, but it is not the most common initial pattern.

“Loss of uterine pressure” refers to loss of toco signal, not a fetal heart rate characteristic.

Therefore, NCC-validated interpretation: prolonged and variable decelerations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract Without Links:

According to the NCC C-EFM Content Outline and AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles, recurrent decelerations are specifically defined as decelerations that occur with ≥50% of uterine contractions in a 20–30-minute window, but standardized interpretation guidelines used by NCC and ACOG categorize recurrent patterns based on any 30-minute evaluation period.

AWHONN (FHM 6th Ed.) explains that fetal heart patterns must be evaluated over “a sufficiently long segment, typically 30 minutes, to determine whether the pattern is intermittent or recurrent.”

Menihan & Simpson further emphasize that recurrent decelerations imply a persistent physiologic stressor, requiring systematic evaluation and intrauterine resuscitation. NCC's Candidate Guide ties this rule directly into categorization within Category II and III tracings. Therefore, 30 minutes is the correct standard evaluation interval for determining recurrence.

====================================================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (From NCC C-EFM–Referenced Sources)

The NCC C-EFM exam outline, along with AWHONN and Miller’s Pocket Guide, define baseline fetal heart rate as the mean FHR rounded to increments of 5 bpm, measured over a 10-minute window, excluding:

• accelerations

• decelerations

• periods of marked variability

• any segments differing by >25 bpm

This aligns with ACOG, AWHONN, and Simpson’s interpretation standards.

Option A is incorrect: the baseline is not documented as a 15-bpm range; it is documented as a single value (e.g., 140 bpm).

Option C is incorrect: the correct NCC/ACOG standardized normal baseline is 110–160 bpm, not 170.

Exact Extract Concepts Referenced:

– “Baseline is determined over a 10-minute period excluding periodic or episodic changes.” (AWHONN FHR Principles)

– “Baseline is the mean FHR rounded to 5-bpm increments.” (Miller’s Pocket Guide)

– “Normal baseline is 110–160 bpm.” (Simpson & Menihan; Creasy & Resnik)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

NCC and AWHONN explain that Contraction Stress Testing (CST):

Has a higher rate of equivocal (“equivocal–suspicious” or “equivocal–hyperstimulation”) results

Frequently must be repeated or replaced with other tests

Requires inducing contractions, which carries risk (hyperstimulation, preterm labor, uterine rupture in scarred uterus)

NST is used more commonly because it is:

Noninvasive

Easier to perform

Has fewer contraindications

Has a lower rate of equivocal results

Why the others are incorrect:

B — CST does detect fetal compromise reliably and is NOT limited in its reporting structure.

C — A negative CST actually has very high negative predictive value for 7 days, making this answer incorrect.

Thus the correct choice is A. Higher frequency of equivocal results.