Data-Architect Exam Dumps - Salesforce Certified Data Architect (SP25)

According to the Salesforce documentation1, the query plan tool is a tool that can be enabled and used in the developer console to analyze the performance of a SOQL query. The query plan tool shows the cost, cardinality, sObject type, and relative cost of each query plan that Salesforce considers for a query. The relative cost indicates how expensive a query plan is compared to the Force.com query optimizer threshold. A query plan with a relative cost above 1.0 is likely to cause a time-out error.

To identify why the query is taking too long, a data architect should use the query plan tool in the developer console (option B). This way, the data architect can see which query plan is chosen by Salesforce and how it affects the performance of the query. The data architect can also use the query plan tool to optimize the query by adding indexes, filters, or limits to reduce the cost and improve the efficiency of the query.

Using Splunk to query the system logs looking for transaction time and CPU usage (option A) is not a good solution, as it can be complex, costly, and difficult to integrate with Salesforce. It may also not provide enough information or insights to identify and optimize the query performance. Using Salesforce’s query optimizer to analyze the query in the developer console (option C) is also not a good solution, as it is not a separate tool that can be used in the developer console. The query optimizer is a feature that runs automatically when a SOQL query is executed and chooses the best query plan based on various factors2. Opening a ticket with Salesforce support to retrieve transaction logs to be analyzed for processing time (option D) is also not a good solution, as it can be time-consuming, dependent, and inefficient. It may also not provide enough information or insights to identify and optimize the query performance.

The correct answer is A. To migrate the data to Salesforce, the data architect should create custom objects to store agent relationships. This will allow the data architect to replicate the look-up table structure from the legacy CRM system and maintain the relationship data in Salesforce. Option B is incorrect because migrating to Salesforce without a record owner will cause errors and prevent the data from being imported. Option C is incorrect because assigning record owner based on relationship will not preserve the agent relationships from the legacy CRM system. Option D is incorrect because migrating the data and assigning to a non-person system user will not allow the users to access and modify the data.

 Specify the legacy CRM as the system of record during transition until it is removed from operation and fully replaced by Salesforce. This is a good technique to ensure data consistency and avoid conflicts between the two systems. Work with stakeholders to establish a Master Data Management plan for the system of record for specific objects, records, and fields. This is another good technique to define the data governance and stewardship policies and processes for managing data quality and integrity across multiple systems

Data integrity and data usability are two aspects of data that an Enterprise data governance program aims to improve. Data integrity refers to the accuracy, consistency, and validity of the data across the enterprise2. Data usability refers to the ease of access, analysis, and interpretation of the data by the end users

 Creating a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, using standard matching rules for these objects, and setting the action to report and alert for both creates and edits can help UC fix the issue immediately by prompting users about a record that possibly exists in Salesforce. This can also generate a report regarding duplicate records that can be used for further analysis and resolution

Enabling granular locking allows concurrent sharing rule calculations and group membership updates to run without locking each other1. This can help resolve the group membership locking issues that UC is experiencing.

The three key steps that a data architect should take when merging data from multiple systems into Salesforce are:

Analyze each system’s data model and perform gap analysis. This step involves understanding the structure and meaning of the data in each system, identifying the common and unique data elements, and mapping the data fields between the systems. This step also involves assessing the quality and consistency of the data, and identifying any data cleansing or transformation needs.

Utilize an ETL tool to merge, transform, and de-duplicate data. This step involves using an ETL tool to connect to the source systems, extract the data, apply any data transformations or validations, and load the data into Salesforce. This step also involves applying de-duplication rules or algorithms to avoid creating duplicate records in Salesforce.

Work with stakeholders to define record and field survivorship rules. This step involves collaborating with the business users and owners of the data to determine which records and fields should be retained or overwritten in case of conflicts or discrepancies. This step also involves defining the criteria and logic for record and field survivorship, and implementing them in the ETL tool or in Salesforce.

Creating new fields to store additional values from all the systems is not a key step, but rather a possible outcome of the gap analysis. It may not be necessary or desirable to create new fields for every value from every system, as it may result in redundant or irrelevant data. Installing a 3rd party AppExchange tool to handle the merger is not a key step, but rather a possible option for choosing an ETL tool. It may not be the best option depending on the requirements, budget, and preferences of the organization.

According to the exam guide, one of the objectives is to "describe best practices for implementing a single-org strategy in a B2C scenario"1. This implies that option D is the best practice for loading individual consumers as contacts in Salesforce. This approach avoids creating unnecessary accounts and reduces data duplication. Option C is not correct because it creates one account per contact, which increases data volume and complexity. Options A and B are not correct because they do not leverage the standard contact object, which provides native functionality and integration with other Salesforce features.