Data-Architect Exam Dumps - Salesforce Certified Data Architect (SP25)

To allow only the owner of a contact record to delete that contact, the data architect should create a “before delete” trigger to check if the current user is not the owner. The trigger can use the UserInfo.getUserId() method to get the current user’s ID and compare it with the OwnerId field of the contact record. If they are not equal, the trigger can add an error to the record and prevent it from being deleted. The other options are not suitable for meeting the requirements, as they would either restrict the edit access or delete access for all users, regardless of ownership.

Creating a custom lookup field on the standard Product to reference the parent record in the hierarchy is the correct way to modify the standard Product object model to support a hierarchical data structure. This allows UC to create a self-relationship on the Product object and define parent-child relationships among products.

The recommended approach to re-run the test is to refresh the full copy sandbox and re-run the data migration test. A full copy sandbox is a replica of the production Org, including all data, metadata, and attachments. Refreshing a full copy sandbox means creating a new copy of the production Org and replacing the existing sandbox. This would ensure that the test is run on a clean and up-to-date environment, without any leftover data or configuration from previous tests. Truncating or hard deleting objects would not be sufficient, because they would not remove all the data or metadata from the sandbox, and they could also affect other dependent objects or processes.

According to the Salesforce documentation4, Marketing Cloud is a platform that allows creating and managing marketing campaigns across multiple channels, such as email, mobile, social media, web, etc. Marketing Cloud can integrate with Sales Cloud and other Salesforce products to share data and insights. One of the ways to integrate Marketing Cloud with Sales Cloud is using Marketing Cloud Connect5, which allows syncing data between the two platforms using synchronized data sources.

However, if UC occasionally gets a list of prospects from third-party sources as CSV files for marketing purposes, it may not be necessary or efficient to load them into Sales Cloud first and then sync them with Marketing Cloud. This can consume large amounts of storage in Sales Cloud, which has a limit based on the license type6. It can also cause data quality issues, such as duplicates or outdated information.

A better option for UC is to load the contacts directly to Marketing Cloud using Import Definition, which allows importing data from external files or databases into Marketing Cloud data extensions. Data extensions are custom tables that store marketing data in Marketing Cloud. This way, UC can avoid storage issues in Sales Cloud and optimize the marketing process by sending marketing communications directly from Marketing Cloud.

To track prospects that are converted to customers, UC can have a reconciliation process that compares the contacts in Marketing Cloud with the accounts or contacts in Sales Cloud. This can be done using SQL queries or API calls to access and compare data from both platforms. Alternatively, UC can use Marketing Cloud Connect to sync the converted contacts from Sales Cloud to Marketing Cloud using synchronized data sources.

Loading the CSV files in Einstein Analytics and syncing with Marketing Cloud prior to sending marketing communications (option A) is not a good option, as it can add unnecessary complexity and latency to the process. Einstein Analytics is a platform that allows creating and analyzing data using interactive dashboards and reports. It is not designed for importing and exporting data for marketing purposes.

Loading the CSV files in an external database and syncing with Marketing Cloud prior to sending marketing communications (option B) is also not a good option, as it can incur additional costs and maintenance for the external database. It can also introduce data security and privacy risks, as the data may not be encrypted or protected by Salesforce.

Continuing to use the existing process to use Lead object to sync with Marketing Cloud and delete Lead records from Sales after the sync is complete (option D) is not a good option, as it can cause performance issues and data loss. Deleting Lead records from Sales can affect reporting and auditing, as well as trigger workflows and validations that may not be intended. It can also cause data inconsistency and synchronization errors between Sales Cloud and Marketing Cloud.

The two features that a data architect should recommend to share records between Salesforce orgs are:

Change Data Capture (CDC): This is a feature that publishes change events for changes in Salesforce records, such as create, update, delete, and undelete operations. Change events can be subscribed by external systems or other Salesforce orgs using various tools, such as Platform Events, Streaming API, or CometD. CDC can help keep data in sync between Salesforce orgs in near real time89.

Salesforce to Salesforce (S2S): This is a feature that allows sharing records and related data with other Salesforce orgs that you partner with. You can choose which records and fields to share, and which orgs to share with. You can also accept updates from the other orgs to keep the data consistent10.

Salesforce Connect is not a good feature to share records between Salesforce orgs because it is intended for integrating external data sources with Salesforce using external objects. Federation Search is not a good feature to share records between Salesforce orgs because it is intended for searching across multiple Salesforce orgs without sharing data.

Determining if any integration points create records in Salesforce, running key reports to determine what fields should be required, and reviewing the sharing model to determine impact on duplicate records are three areas of Salesforce that the architect should review before proposing any design recommendation. These areas will help to identify the sources and quality of data, the business rules and validations for data entry, and the access and visibility of data across users and roles. Reviewing the metadata xml files for redundant fields to consolidate, and exporting the setup audit trail to review what fields are being used are not necessary steps for optimizing a data stewardship engagement, as they are more related to metadata management and audit tracking.

Having each system pull the record changes from Salesforce using change data capture (option D) is the correct solution for ensuring all systems using customer data are kept up to date, as it allows the systems to subscribe to real-time events from Salesforce and receive notifications when customer records are created, updated, deleted, or undeleted. Sending customer data nightly to the system of truth in a scheduled batch job (option A) or sending customer record changes from Salesforce to each system in a nightly batch job (option B) are not good solutions, as they may cause data latency and inconsistency, and they do not provide real-time updates. Sending customer record changes from Salesforce to the system of truth in real time (option C) is also not a good solution, as it does not address how the other systems will receive the updates from the system of truth.

To capture and report on any changes made to ten text fields on the Contact object for the past 3 months, the data architect should write an Apex trigger on Contact after insert and after update events and store the old values in another custom object, or turn on field Contact object history tracking for these ten fields and create reports on contact history. An Apex trigger can capture the old and new values of the fields, as well as the user and time of the change, and store them in a custom object that can be used for reporting. Field history tracking can also track the changes to the fields and store them in a history table that can be used for reporting. However, field history tracking only retains data for up to 18 months or 24 months with an extension, so it may not be suitable for longer-term reporting needs. The other options are not feasible or effective for capturing and reporting on field data changes.