CPIM-8.0 Exam Dumps - Certified in Planning and Inventory Management (CPIM 8.0)

Substituting capital equipment in place of direct labor can be economically justified for scenario A, where volumes are forecasted to increase. This is because capital equipment can provide higher productivity, efficiency, and quality than direct labor, especially for large-scale and standardized production. Capital equipment can also reduce labor costs, such as wages, benefits, and training, and avoid labor shortages or turnover. However, capital equipment also involves high initial investment, maintenance, and depreciation costs, and may require more skilled workers to operate and monitor. Therefore, the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor should be based on a careful analysis of the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of both alternatives.

Option B is not correct, because material prices are forecasted to increase. This scenario does not directly affect the decision to substitute capital equipment for direct labor, as both alternatives use the same materials. However, increasing material prices may reduce the profitability of the production, and may require the company to find ways to reduce material usage, such as improving material yield, reducing scrap and rework, or sourcing from cheaper suppliers.

Option C is not correct, because implementing a pull system in production. This scenario does not favor the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as a pull system is based on the principle of producing only what is needed by the customer, when it is needed, and in the quantity needed. A pull system requires flexibility, responsiveness, and adaptability to the changing customer demand, which may be better achieved by direct labor than capital equipment. A pull system also aims to minimize inventory, waste, and overproduction, which may reduce the need for capital equipment.

Option D is not correct, because functional layouts are being utilized. This scenario does not support the substitution of capital equipment for direct labor, as functional layouts are based on grouping similar or related processes or machines together, regardless of the product flow. Functional layouts may result in long and complex material flows, high transportation and handling costs, high work-in-process inventory, and low visibility and coordination of the production. Functional layouts may also require more direct labor to move and monitor the materials and machines. Capital equipment may be more suitable for product layouts, where the processes or machines are arranged according to the sequence of operations for a specific product or family of products.

Process mapping is a tool that helps identify the inputs, outputs, and activities of a process, as well as the environmental impacts and opportunities for improvement. Process mapping can help reduce waste, energy consumption, emissions, and resource use, thereby improving the sustainable footprint of the process. Therefore, option A is correct. Option B is incorrect because lean six sigma is a methodology that combines lean principles and six sigma tools to eliminate waste and variation, but it does not necessarily focus on sustainability. Option C is incorrect because SWOT analysis is a tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a business or a project, but it does not specifically analyze the environmental aspects. Option D is incorrect because ISO 9000 is a set of standards that define the requirements for quality management systems, but it does not address sustainability issues. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section H: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Subsection H.4: Sustainability, p. 86.

Fixed order quantity is a method that places a replenishment order when the quantity on hand falls below a predetermined level, called the reorder point. The reorder point is calculated based on the expected demand during the lead time and the safety stock. The order quantity is fixed and constant, and it is determined by the economic order quantity (EOQ) formula or other criteria. Fixed order quantity is also known as the order point/order quantity (OP/OQ) system or the continuous review system.

Option A is not correct, because min-max system is a method that places a replenishment order when the quantity on hand falls below a minimum level, called the order point. The order quantity is variable and depends on the difference between the maximum level and the current inventory level. Min-max system is also known as the two-bin system or the bin system.

Option C is not correct, because periodic review is a method that places a replenishment order at fixed intervals of time, regardless of the quantity on hand. The order quantity is variable and depends on the difference between the target inventory level and the current inventory level. Periodic review is also known as the fixed order interval (FOI) system or the periodic order quantity (POQ) system.

Option D is not correct, because available-to-promise (ATP) is not a method of inventory replenishment, but a calculation of the uncommitted portion of the current inventory and planned production. ATP is used to promise delivery dates to customers based on the availability of inventory and production capacity.