AAISM Exam Dumps - ISACA Advanced in AI Security Management (AAISM) Exam

The AAISM framework stresses that the most effective way to maintain oversight of organizational AI usage is by maintaining a comprehensive inventory of all AI systems and the business units using them. Such an inventory provides a centralized, transparent record of where AI is deployed, ensuring accountability, monitoring, and compliance. While board approval, dashboards, and KPIs are important governance tools, they do not provide holistic visibility across the enterprise. The inventory ensures traceability and governance alignment, making it the best method to maintain visibility of AI usage.

AAISM stresses that AI systems and their supporting infrastructure must be explicitly included in disaster recovery and continuity planning, since disruptions to models, feature stores, or pipelines can halt critical business functions.

Explainability (A) and retraining (B) are operational improvements, not continuity mechanisms. Multi-zone redundancy (D) improves availability but does not represent complete BCP integration.

AAISM specifies that when AI systems process sensitive or high-impact data (e.g., financial, identity, health), accuracy thresholds become critical risk indicators. Inaccurate predictions can cause harm, regulatory non-compliance, discrimination, or financial loss.

Availability (D) is important but secondary to correctness in sensitive decision scenarios. Response time (B) and accessibility ratings (A) do not outweigh the need for accurate, reliable predictions.

An AI acceptable use policy (AUP) sets the organizational expectations and boundaries for how AI systems may be used by employees and third parties. AAISM guidance places emphasis on ethical and legal compliance standards as core elements of an AUP to govern responsible behavior, prevent misuse, and align with regulatory and organizational principles. While data requirements, collection/storage processes, and monitoring may be covered in adjacent standards and procedures (e.g., data management policies, SOPs, and operational runbooks), the AUP’s essential function is to codify permissible use anchored to ethics, legality, and organizational values.

The AAISM framework highlights that organizations adopting AI must ensure accountability structures are in place to govern ethical and responsible use. An accountability model assigns clear responsibility for decisions, outputs, and risks related to AI systems. While model cards provide transparency about a model’s design and performance, they are primarily documentation tools. Vendor monitoring focuses on third-party oversight, not internal accountability. Security by design improves resilience but does not by itself address ethical use. The governance approach that most directly supports responsible and ethical AI deployment is an accountability model.

AAISM guidance on crisis management and communication emphasizes that the initial priority in responding to a reputational or market manipulation attack is to provide accurate clarifying information to the public through a pre-approved statement. This ensures stakeholders and markets are given verified facts immediately, limiting the spread of misinformation. While forensic analysis, employee training, and monitoring activities are important, they occur after the immediate need for public trust and damage control is addressed. Pre-approved statements are a central control in AI-related incident response to ensure consistency, timeliness, and credibility in communications.

AAISM requires formal change management for AI systems, including vendor-initiated changes: pre-approval, documented impact assessment (ethics/compliance/performance), regression testing, sign-off by accountable owners, and traceable release records. While MSAs (A) and shared responsibility models (B) set contractual/role baselines, they do not enforce per-change approvals. Data minimization (C) reduces exposure but does not control model substitutions.

The first action, before any processing of personal data for AI-driven profiling and targeted communications, is to establish a lawful basis for processing. Under AAISM-aligned privacy governance, explicit and informed consent is prioritized for new or sensitive uses such as interest profiling and targeted marketing. Consent ensures purpose limitation, transparency, and user control prior to model ingestion and campaign activation. Training teams, updating terms of service, or verifying contact details are important, but they do not provide legal authority to process data; therefore, they follow after consent is obtained.