AAISM Exam Dumps - ISACA Advanced in AI Security Management (AAISM) Exam

In AAISM, an adversarial attack is defined by maliciously crafted inputs designed to cause erroneous model behavior (misclassification, targeted misprediction) while the model architecture and parameters remain unchanged. Hardware compromise (A) and DoS (D) are system-level attacks, not adversarial ML per se. Social engineering to obtain model information (C) is an information-gathering or security breach vector, distinct from input-space adversarial manipulation.

AAISM emphasizes systemic or structural bias as a high-impact risk because biased data leads directly to discriminatory insights or decisions when used for analytics or reporting. This risk affects fairness, compliance, and organizational reputation.

Hallucinations (A) relate more to generative AI. Incomplete outputs (B) affect accuracy but not structural fairness. Lack of normalization (C) affects performance but is not the dominant risk.

AAISM describes AI architecture as a strategic alignment framework, ensuring AI systems, data pipelines, governance processes, and capabilities match organizational business goals and regulatory requirements.

While threat identification (B) and scalability (D) are advantages, the primary purpose is business alignment. Option A is not a core architectural objective.

For regulated data such as patient information, AAISM requires provable data lifecycle closure at decommissioning. The authoritative evidence is a certificate of destruction (covering primary, replicas, backups, and caches) retained per the organization’s records retention policy. While testing backups and auditing access (A), updating policies (B), and doing post-destruction risk assessment (C) are valuable practices, documented destruction attestation is the primary compliance proof point that the data was disposed of in accordance with regulatory and contractual obligations.

AAISM emphasizes that the core outcome of AI risk assessments is prioritization: mapping threat likelihood and business impact to determine which risks to treat first, at what strength, and with which controls. Implementing privacy controls (A), funding alignment (B), and updating registers (C) are important outputs, but the greatest benefit is making defensible, prioritized decisions that align with risk appetite and optimize control selection and resource allocation.