Workday-Pro-Compensation Exam Dumps - WorkdayProCompensationExam

APeriod Salary Planin Workday supports paying employees more than 12 times per year (e.g., 13 or 14 payments for regions like Italy or Spain).

This allows payroll to spread annual salary across the correct number of pay periods.

Why not the others?

A. Unit salary plan– Pays based on units (like per credit hour for faculty), not extra months.

B. Hourly plan– Pays by worked hours, not relevant to salaried employees.

D. Salary plan– Standard salary plan assumes 12 months and does not support extra pay periods.

The scenario describes acompensation partnerbeing able to assignany allowance plan, even when the employee isnot eligible.

This is controlled by thesecurity domain "Add Compensation Plans: Add Allowance", which allows users with access to bypass eligibility and directly assign allowance plans.

Why not the others?

A. Worker Data: Compensation Plan Type→ Governs visibility to compensation data, not bypassing eligibility.

B. Select Any Compensation Package→ Pertains to choosing packages, not adding allowance plans outside eligibility.

C. Worker Data: Compensation for Managers→ Grants managers ability to propose comp, but does not override eligibility.

Maintain Custom Validationsallows you to refine which events validations apply to.

Workday distinguishes betweenRequest One-Time Payment(manager/HR initiated) andRequest One-Time Payment for Self(employee initiated).

By using theOne Time Payment Event for Self field, you can exclude self-service events from being validated by the existing custom validations.

Why not the others?

B. Add new validations→ Would duplicate rules rather than exclude them.

C. Remove Employee as Self from security domain→ Would block employees from submitting requests, not exclude validations.

D. Configure Options Fields→ Controls fields displayed, not validation logic.

Compensationgradesdefine pay ranges, andgrade profilesallow variation bylocation, job family, or other attributes.

In this case, the Software Engineer role exists inLondon, New York, and Milan, so the best practice is to:

Createone compensation grade(Software Engineer).

Addgrade profilesfor each location, each with its own pay range.

Attach thegrade(with all profiles) to the job profile.

Why not the others?

A. One grade per location→ Duplicates maintenance effort; profiles exist for this purpose.

B. Three grades tied to three job profiles→ Unnecessary; job profile is the same role globally.

D. One grade with eligibility rules→ Eligibility determines who qualifies, not pay ranges per location.

TheDynamic Displayoption controls whether Workday shows onlyrelevant compensation plan sectionsduring transactions likePropose Compensation Change.

It evaluates:

Worker eligibility rules(which plans apply).

User security permissions(what the initiator can see).

This ensures users only see compensation sections relevant to their context, reducing clutter and errors.

Why not the others?

A. Segment security→ Controls data security, not dynamic display.

C. Hide Total Salary & Allowances→ Hides totals, doesn’t manage section visibility.

D. Eligibility Rule Performance Enhancement→ Improves performance, not visibility.

ForTotal Cost (India), the requirement is that only50% of total compshould be allocated towardsalary plans.

This is achieved by using theManage Basis Total option, where you can set maximum percentages for specific plan types (e.g., Salary = 50%).

This ensures salary stays capped at half of total, regardless of other components.

Why not the others?

A. Fixed compensation basis→ Doesn’t handle percentage capping.

B. Remove retirement plans→ Irrelevant; retirement can stay, the key is controlling salary %.

D. Change ranking to 50→ Ranking only determines basis priority, not limits.

Out of Order Compensation Changes Reportidentifies employees with compensation changes enteredwith earlier effective dates than existing future-dated changes.

This prevents conflicts in comp history and ensures payroll/comp processing accuracy.

Why not the others?

A. Employee Compensation Audit→ Audits eligibility and assignment mismatches, not date conflicts.

B. Future Payment Audit→ Focuses on scheduled payments, not comp changes.

D. Compensation Changes→ General report, doesn’t flag sequencing issues.

Employees requestingone-time payments for selfmay see sensitive options likeGross UporSend to Payroll.

To prevent them from updating these fields, configureOptional Fields for Request One-Time Payment for Selfand hide the checkboxes.

This limits their visibility and update access without affecting manager/HR workflows.

Why not the others?

A. Optional Fields for Request One-Time Payment→ Applies to manager/HR use, not self-service.

C. Remove Employee as Self from self-service comp domain→ Would block employees from initiating requests entirely.

D. Payroll security domain→ Payroll security doesn’t control compensation request UI fields.