SY0-701 Exam Dumps - CompTIA Security+ Exam 2026

Counterfeit hardware is hardware that is built or modified without the authorization of the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). It can pose serious risks to network quality, performance, safety, and reliability12. Counterfeit hardware can also contain malicious components that can compromise the security of the network and the data that flows through it3. To address the risks associated with procuring counterfeit hardware, a company should conduct a thorough analysis of the supply chain, which is the network of entities involved in the production, distribution, and delivery of the hardware. By analyzing the supply chain, the company can verify the origin, authenticity, and integrity of the hardware, and identify any potential sources of counterfeit or tampered products. A thorough analysis of the supply chain can include the following steps:

Establishing a trusted relationship with the OEM and authorized resellers

Requesting documentation and certification of the hardware from the OEM or authorized resellers

Inspecting the hardware for any signs of tampering, such as mismatched labels, serial numbers, or components

Testing the hardware for functionality, performance, and security

Implementing a tracking system to monitor the hardware throughout its lifecycle

Reporting any suspicious or counterfeit hardware to the OEM and law enforcement agencies References = 1: Identify Counterfeit and Pirated Products - Cisco, 2: What Is HardwareSecurity? Definition, Threats, and Best Practices, 3: Beware of Counterfeit Network Equipment - TechNewsWorld, : Counterfeit Hardware: The Threat and How to Avoid It

Using two different cloud solutions to store data is an example of platform diversity, which helps reduce dependency on a single cloud provider and enhances resilience against vendor-specific failures or outages.

Load balancing (A) distributes workloads across resources; parallel processing (B) refers to simultaneous processing of tasks; clustering (D) involves grouping servers to act as a single system.

Platform diversity is a recognized architectural strategy to improve availability and fault tolerance, covered in Security Architecture concepts for SY0-701【6:Chapter 10†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】

ARP cache poisoning is the best answer because the affected endpoint’s traceroute shows an unexpected first hop, 10.20.10.10, with high latency before reaching the normal gateway path. The unaffected device connected to the same port reaches 10.20.10.1 as the first hop, which strongly suggests the issue is specific to the affected endpoint’s local ARP mapping rather than the switch port, router, or destination resource. ARP poisoning manipulates a host’s ARP cache so traffic is sent to the wrong MAC address, often enabling traffic interception or redirection. An on-path attack is possible as a result, but ARP cache poisoning is the specific mechanism. Resource exhaustion and DNS spoofing do not match the traceroute evidence.

Software as a Service (SaaS) represents an application that is hosted in the cloud and accessible via the internet from anywhere, with no requirement for on-premises infrastructure. SaaS applications are managed by a third-party provider, allowing users to access them through a web browser, making them highly scalable and flexible for remote access.

 A honey pot is a system or a network that is designed to mimic a real production server and attract potential attackers. A honey pot can be used to identify the attacker’s methods, techniques, and objectives without affecting the actual production servers. A honey pot can also divert the attacker’s attention from the real targets and waste their time and resources12.

The other options are not effective ways to identify potential attacker activities without affecting production servers:

Video surveillance: This is a physical security technique that uses cameras and monitors to record and observe the activities in a certain area. Video surveillance can help to deter, detect, and investigate physical intrusions, but it does not directly identify the attacker’s activities on the network or the servers3.

Zero Trust: This is a security strategy that assumes that no user, device, or network is trustworthy by default and requires strict verification and validation for every request and transaction. Zero Trust can help to improve the security posture and reduce the attack surface of an organization, but it does not directly identify the attacker’s activities on the network or the servers4.

Geofencing: This is a security technique that uses geographic location as a criterion to restrict or allow access to data or resources. Geofencing can help to protect the data sovereignty andcompliance of an organization, but it does not directly identify the attacker’s activities on the network or the servers5.

References = 1: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 542: Honeypots and Deception – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 2.1, video by Professor Messer3: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 974: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 985: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 99.

Port security is the best mitigation technique for preventing an attacker from flooding the MAC address table of network switches. Port security can limit the number of MAC addresses learned on a port, preventing an attacker from overwhelming the switch ' s MAC table (a form of MAC flooding attack). When the allowed number of MAC addresses is exceeded, port security can block additional devices or trigger alerts.

Load balancer distributes network traffic but does not address MAC flooding attacks.

IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) detects and prevents attacks but isn ' t specifically designed for MAC flooding mitigation.

NGFW (Next-Generation Firewall) offers advanced traffic inspection but is not directly involved in MAC table security​​​.

The correct answer is B. Port mirroring.

Port mirroring, also known as SPAN, copies network traffic from one or more switch ports or VLANs to another port where a monitoring tool, packet analyzer, IDS, or SIEM-related sensor can inspect the traffic. This is the most appropriate method when the goal is to collect network traffic directly from a switch to gain visibility into network activity.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Syslog

Syslog collects log messages from systems, applications, and network devices. It is useful for SIEM log ingestion, but it does not capture full network traffic from a switch.

C. Port forwarding

Port forwarding redirects traffic from one port or IP address to another, commonly used for NAT or remote access. It is not used to monitor switch traffic.

D. Load balancer logs

Load balancer logs provide information about traffic passing through a load balancer, but they do not provide broad switch-level network visibility.

Therefore, the best answer is port mirroring.

The scenario describes an instance where an employee receives a fraudulent invoice from a vendor that is not recognized in the company ' s vendor management system. This is a classic example of an invoice scam, where attackers attempt to trick organizations into making payments for fake or non-existent services. These scams often rely on social engineering tactics to bypass financial controls.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, particularly in the context of social engineering attacks and common scams​​.