SY0-701 Exam Dumps - CompTIA Security+ Exam 2025

Because these are Wi-Fi–enabled environmental sensors, they are effectively IoT/embedded devices that often have limited security controls, inconsistent patch support, and may expose management interfaces or services. A common Security+ best practice is to reduce their attack surface and limit lateral movement by placing them in a separate, protected network segment and tightly controlling what they can talk to (for example, only to the metrics collector/broker). The Study Guide explicitly calls out VLAN-based segmentation for IoT as a hardening technique: “A common technique used in hardening networks is the use of VLANs… Placing IoT devices on a separate, protected VLAN with appropriate access controls… can help to ensure that frequently vulnerable devices are more protected.” It also reinforces this in a practice question scenario: “What security control should she recommend…? … Deploy the IoT devices to a protected VLAN.”

Why the other options are less likely:

A (risk register) is governance documentation, not the most likely immediate technical control for deployment.

C (air gap) is usually unrealistic for Wi-Fi sensors that must transmit metrics.

D (TLS 1.2) may be beneficial, but many sensors can’t support strong crypto consistently; segmentation is the most broadly applicable first move to contain risk.

 Capacity planning is the process of determining the resources needed to meet the current and future demands of an organization. Capacity planning can help a company develop a business continuity strategy by estimating how many staff members would be required to sustain the business in the case of a disruption, such as a natural disaster, a cyberattack, or a pandemic. Capacity planning can also help a company optimize the use of its resources, reduce costs, and improve performance. References = CompTIA Security+ Study Guide with over 500 Practice Test Questions: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, Chapter 4, page 184. CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1, page 14. Business Continuity – SY0-601 CompTIA Security+ : 4.1

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The described scenario is CYOD (Choose Your Own Device). In a CYOD model, employees may choose from a list of company-approved devices. These devices are vetted for compatibility, security, and organizational standards while still providing some flexibility to employees.

The SY0-701 exam differentiates CYOD from other mobile deployment models:

COPE (D) – Company-Owned, Personally Enabled: devices are company-owned and fully managed, but employees can use them personally.

MDM (A) – Mobile Device Management: a tool, not a deployment model, used for managing configurations and security on devices.

PED (C) – Portable Electronic Device: a generic category, not a deployment strategy.

CYOD strikes a balance between employee preference and maintaining a secure, standardized environment. It reduces risk associated with BYOD while avoiding the rigidity of COPE. CYOD also supports consistent patching, support, and security enforcement because all devices meet the organization’s baseline criteria.

This aligns with the Security Architecture section of SY0-701, where the exam stresses secure device deployment strategies and maintaining uniform controls over endpoint assets.

Detailed Explanation:Smishing is a type of phishing attack that uses SMS text messages to deceive recipients into taking actions such as revealing sensitive information. The urgency in the text indicates this vector. Reference: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Study Guide, Domain 2: Threats, Section: "Social Engineering Techniques"​​.

Ongoing vendor monitoring is a critical component of third-party risk management (TPRM) and focuses on continuously validating that vendors maintain required security controls throughout the lifecycle of the relationship. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, the most effective ongoing monitoring method is conducting assessments to verify compliance with security requirements. These assessments may include periodic security questionnaires, audits, penetration test results, SOC reports, or compliance attestations that are independently validated.

Option A, requiring a new MSA for each project, is a contractual activity, not a monitoring mechanism. Option B—accepting self-attestation without verification—introduces risk and is specifically discouraged in SY0-701 because it lacks assurance. Option D, reviewing SLAs at contract start, is a one-time activity and does not provide continuous oversight.

Ongoing assessments allow organizations to detect control drift, identify new risks, and ensure vendors remain compliant with evolving regulatory and security expectations. This proactive approach is essential for managing supply chain risk and protecting organizational data.

Therefore, the correct answer is C: Conducting assessments to verify compliance with security requirements.

Applying the latest OS updates, patches, and endpoint definitions is the most effective way to prevent known exploits, which are attacks leveraging previously discovered vulnerabilities for which fixes are available.