Professional-Cloud-Network-Engineer Exam Dumps - Google Cloud Certified - Professional Cloud Network Engineer

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for using privately used public IP (PUPI) addresses for GKE Pod address blocks1. The benefits of this approach are:

It allows you to use any public IP addresses that are not owned by Google or your organization for your Pods, which can help mitigate address exhaustion in your enterprise.

It prevents any external traffic from reaching your Pods, as Google Cloud does not route PUPI addresses to the internet or to other VPC networks by default.

It enables you to use VPC Network Peering to connect your GKE cluster to other VPC networks that use different PUPI addresses, as long as you enable the export and import of custom routes for the peering connection.

It preserves the fully integrated network model of GKE, where Pods can communicate with nodes and other resources in the same VPC network without NAT.

The options that you need to select when creating a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses are:

–disable-default-snat: This option disables source NAT for outbound traffic from Pods to destinations outside the cluster’s VPC network. This is necessary to prevent Pods from using RFC 1918 addresses as their source IP addresses, which could cause conflicts with other networks that use the same address space2.

–enable-ip-alias: This option enables alias IP ranges for Pods and Services, which allows you to use separate subnet ranges for them. This is required to use PUPI addresses for Pods1.

–enable-private-nodes: This option creates a private cluster, where nodes do not have external IP addresses and can only communicate with the control plane through a private endpoint. This enhances the security and privacy of your cluster3.

Option A is incorrect because it does not use PUPI addresses for Pods, but rather RFC 1918 addresses. This does not solve the problem of address exhaustion in your enterprise. Option B is incorrect because it reuses the secondary address range for Services across multiple private GKE clusters, which could cause IP conflicts and routing issues. Option C is incorrect because it does not specify the options that are needed to create a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses.

1: Configuring privately used public IPs for GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud 2: Using Cloud NAT with GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud 3: Private clusters | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud

The correct answer is D. Create privately used public IP primary and secondary subnet ranges for the clusters. Create a private GKE cluster with the following options selected: --disable-default-snat, --enable-ip-alias, and --enable-private-nodes.

This answer is based on the following facts:

Privately used public IP (PUPI) addresses are any public IP addresses not owned by Google that a customer can use privately on Google Cloud1. You can use PUPI addresses for GKE pods and services in private clusters to mitigate address exhaustion.

A private GKE cluster is a cluster that has no public IP addresses on the nodes2. You can use private clusters to isolate your workloads from the public internet and enhance security.

The --disable-default-snat option disables source network address translation (SNAT) for the cluster3. This option allows you to use PUPI addresses without conflicting with other public IP addresses on the internet.

The --enable-ip-alias option enables alias IP ranges for the cluster4. This option allows you to use separate subnet ranges for nodes, pods, and services, and to specify the size of those ranges.

The --enable-private-nodes option enables private nodes for the cluster5. This option ensures that the nodes have no public IP addresses and can only communicate with other Google Cloud resources in the same VPC network or peered networks.

The other options are not correct because:

Option A is not suitable. Creating RFC 1918 primary and secondary subnet IP ranges for the clusters does not solve the problem of address exhaustion. Re-using the secondary address range for pods across multiple private GKE clusters can cause IP conflicts and routing issues.

Option B is also not suitable. Creating RFC 1918 primary and secondary subnet IP ranges for the clusters does not solve the problem of address exhaustion. Re-using the secondary address range for services across multiple private GKE clusters can cause IP conflicts and routing issues.

Option C is not feasible. Creating privately used public IP primary and secondary subnet ranges for the clusters is a valid step, but creating a private GKE cluster with only --enable-ip-alias and --enable-private-nodes options is not enough. You also need to disable default SNAT to avoid IP conflicts with other public IP addresses on the internet.

The correct answer is C because it meets the requirement of protecting the application from potential application-level attacks. Google Cloud Armor security policies are sets of rules that match on attributes from Layer 3 to Layer 7 to protect externally facing applications1. Web application firewall (WAF) rules are predefined rules that detect and mitigate common web attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, remote file inclusion, and more2. By applying a Google Cloud Armor security policy with WAF rules to the backend service, you can filter out malicious requests before they reach your application.

Option A is incorrect because Cloud CDN is a content delivery network that caches static content at the edge of Google’s network, but it does not provide any protection against application-level attacks3. Option B is incorrect because firewall rules are applied at the VPC network level, not at the load balancer level4. Firewall rules also only match on Layer 3 and 4 attributes, not on Layer 7 attributes that are relevant for application-level attacks4. Option D is incorrect because VPC Service Controls perimeter is a feature that helps you secure your data from unauthorized access by users outside your organization, but it does not protect your application from external attacks.